State of Illinois
91st General Assembly
Legislation

   [ Search ]   [ Legislation ]
[ Home ]   [ Back ]   [ Bottom ]


[ Introduced ][ House Amendment 001 ]

91_HB1569eng

 
HB1569 Engrossed                               LRB9105288DJpr

 1        AN ACT to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 by
 2    changing Section 115-4.

 3        Be it enacted by the People of  the  State  of  Illinois,
 4    represented in the General Assembly:

 5        Section  5.   The  Code  of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
 6    amended by changing Section 115-4 as follows:

 7        (725 ILCS 5/115-4) (from Ch. 38, par. 115-4)
 8        Sec. 115-4.  Trial by Court and Jury.)
 9        (a) Questions of law shall be decided by  the  court  and
10    questions of fact by the jury.
11        (b)  The jury shall consist of 12 members.
12        (c)  Upon  request  the parties shall be furnished with a
13    list of prospective jurors with their addresses if known.
14        (d)  Each party may challenge  jurors  for  cause.  If  a
15    prospective  juror has a physical impairment, the court shall
16    consider such prospective juror's  ability  to  perceive  and
17    appreciate  the  evidence  when  considering  a challenge for
18    cause.
19        (e)  A  defendant  tried  alone  shall  be   allowed   20
20    peremptory  challenges  in  a  capital  case, 10 in a case in
21    which the punishment may be imprisonment in the penitentiary,
22    and 5 in all other cases; except that, in a single  trial  of
23    more  than  one defendant, each defendant shall be allowed 12
24    peremptory challenges in a capital case, 6 in a case in which
25    the punishment may be imprisonment in the penitentiary, and 3
26    in all other cases.  If several charges against  a  defendant
27    or  defendants  are  consolidated  for  trial, each defendant
28    shall be allowed peremptory challenges upon one charge  only,
29    which   single  charge  shall  be  the  charge  against  that
30    defendant authorizing  the  greatest  maximum  penalty.   The
31    State   shall  be  allowed  the  same  number  of  peremptory
 
HB1569 Engrossed            -2-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1    challenges as all of the defendants.
 2        (f)  After examination by the court  the  jurors  may  be
 3    examined,  passed  upon,  accepted  and  tendered by opposing
 4    counsel as provided by Supreme Court rules.
 5        (f-5)  The court must  make  all  reasonable  efforts  to
 6    respect   the  safety  and  privacy  of  prospective  jurors,
 7    utilizing any practicable means, including, but  not  limited
 8    to,   a   pre-trial   jury  questionnaire  or  an  in  camera
 9    examination with all  parties  present,  to  obtain  personal
10    information from the prospective jurors for the court and the
11    parties.
12        (f-6)  In  its  discretion,  and  if  there  is  no other
13    reasonable or practicable means of protecting the safety  and
14    privacy  of  the  prospective jurors, the court may close the
15    courtroom to spectators during the process of jury selection,
16    but only for the limited purpose of  eliciting  responses  to
17    those  questions  which, in the opinion of the court, involve
18    the safety or privacy of the prospective jurors.
19        (g)  After the jury is impaneled and sworn the court  may
20    direct the selection of 2 alternate jurors who shall take the
21    same  oath  as the regular jurors.  Each party shall have one
22    additional peremptory challenge for each alternate juror.  If
23    before the final submission of a cause a member of  the  jury
24    dies  or  is  discharged he shall be replaced by an alternate
25    juror in the order of selection.
26        (h)  A trial by the court and jury shall be conducted  in
27    the  presence  of the defendant unless he waives the right to
28    be present.
29        (i)  After arguments of counsel the court shall  instruct
30    the jury as to the law.
31        (j)  Unless  the affirmative defense of insanity has been
32    presented during the trial, the jury shall return  a  general
33    verdict  as  to  each  offense charged.  When the affirmative
34    defense of insanity has been presented during the trial,  the
 
HB1569 Engrossed            -3-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1    court  shall  provide  the jury not only with general verdict
 2    forms but also with a special verdict form of not  guilty  by
 3    reason  of  insanity, as to each offense charged, and in such
 4    event the court shall separately instruct  the  jury  that  a
 5    special  verdict  of  not guilty by reason of insanity may be
 6    returned instead  of  a  general  verdict  but  such  special
 7    verdict  requires  a  unanimous  finding by the jury that the
 8    defendant committed the acts charged but at the time  of  the
 9    commission  of  those  acts the defendant was insane.  In the
10    event of a verdict of not guilty by  reason  of  insanity,  a
11    hearing  shall  be  held  pursuant  to  the Mental Health and
12    Developmental Disabilities  Code  to  determine  whether  the
13    defendant  is  subject  to  involuntary  admission.  When the
14    affirmative defense of insanity has been presented during the
15    trial, the court, where warranted by the evidence, shall also
16    provide the jury with a special verdict form  of  guilty  but
17    mentally ill, as to each offense charged and shall separately
18    instruct  the  jury  that  a  special  verdict  of guilty but
19    mentally ill may be returned instead of  a  general  verdict,
20    but that such special verdict requires a unanimous finding by
21    the  jury  that: (1) the State has proven beyond a reasonable
22    doubt that the defendant is guilty of  the  offense  charged;
23    and  (2)  the  defendant  has failed to prove his insanity as
24    required in subsection (b) of Section  3-2  of  the  Criminal
25    Code of 1961, as amended, and subsections (a), (b) and (e) of
26    Section 6-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961, as amended; and (3)
27    the  defendant  has proven by a preponderance of the evidence
28    that he was mentally ill, as defined in subsections  (c)  and
29    (d)  of Section 6-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961, as amended,
30    at the time of the offense.
31        (k)  When, at the close of the State's evidence or at the
32    close of all of the evidence, the evidence is insufficient to
33    support a finding or verdict of guilty the court may  and  on
34    motion  of  the  defendant shall make a finding or direct the
 
HB1569 Engrossed            -4-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1    jury to return a verdict of not guilty, enter a  judgment  of
 2    acquittal and discharge the defendant.
 3        (l)  When  the  jury  retires  to consider its verdict an
 4    officer of the court shall be appointed to keep them together
 5    and to prevent conversation between the  jurors  and  others;
 6    however, if any juror is deaf, the jury may be accompanied by
 7    and may communicate with a court-appointed interpreter during
 8    its  deliberations.  Upon  agreement  between  the  State and
 9    defendant or his counsel the jury may seal  and  deliver  its
10    verdict  to the clerk of the court, separate, and then return
11    such verdict in open court at its next session.
12        (m)  In the trial of a  capital  or  other  offense,  any
13    juror  who  is  a  member  of  a panel or jury which has been
14    impaneled and sworn  as  a  panel  or  as  a  jury  shall  be
15    permitted  to  separate  from  other such jurors during every
16    period of adjournment to a later day, until final  submission
17    of  the  cause  to the jury for determination, except that no
18    such separation shall be permitted in  any  trial  after  the
19    court,  upon motion by the defendant or the State or upon its
20    own  motion,  finds  a  probability  that  prejudice  to  the
21    defendant or to the State will result from such separation.
22        (n)  The members of the jury shall be  entitled  to  take
23    notes  during  the  trial,  and  the sheriff of the county in
24    which the jury is sitting shall  provide  them  with  writing
25    materials   for   this  purpose.   Such  notes  shall  remain
26    confidential, and shall be destroyed by the sheriff after the
27    verdict has been returned or a mistrial declared.
28        (o)  A defendant tried by the court and jury  shall  only
29    be  found  guilty, guilty but mentally ill, not guilty or not
30    guilty by reason of insanity, upon the unanimous  verdict  of
31    the jury.
32    (Source: P.A. 86-392.)

[ Top ]