State of Illinois
91st General Assembly
Legislation

   [ Search ]   [ Legislation ]
[ Home ]   [ Back ]   [ Bottom ]


[ Engrossed ][ House Amendment 001 ]

91_HB1569

 
                                               LRB9105288DJpr

 1        AN ACT to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 by
 2    changing Section 115-4.

 3        Be it enacted by the People of  the  State  of  Illinois,
 4    represented in the General Assembly:

 5        Section  5.   The  Code  of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
 6    amended by changing Section 115-4 as follows:

 7        (725 ILCS 5/115-4) (from Ch. 38, par. 115-4)
 8        Sec. 115-4.  Trial by Court and Jury.)
 9        (a) Questions of law shall be decided by  the  court  and
10    questions of fact by the jury.
11        (b)  The jury shall consist of 12 members.
12        (c)  Upon  request  the parties shall be furnished with a
13    list of prospective jurors with their addresses if known.
14        (d)  Each party may challenge  jurors  for  cause.  If  a
15    prospective  juror has a physical impairment, the court shall
16    consider such prospective juror's  ability  to  perceive  and
17    appreciate  the  evidence  when  considering  a challenge for
18    cause.
19        (e)  A  defendant  tried  alone  shall  be   allowed   20
20    peremptory  challenges  in  a  capital  case, 10 in a case in
21    which the punishment may be imprisonment in the penitentiary,
22    and 5 in all other cases; except that, in a single  trial  of
23    more  than  one defendant, each defendant shall be allowed 12
24    peremptory challenges in a capital case, 6 in a case in which
25    the punishment may be imprisonment in the penitentiary, and 3
26    in all other cases.  If several charges against  a  defendant
27    or  defendants  are  consolidated  for  trial, each defendant
28    shall be allowed peremptory challenges upon one charge  only,
29    which   single  charge  shall  be  the  charge  against  that
30    defendant authorizing  the  greatest  maximum  penalty.   The
31    State   shall  be  allowed  the  same  number  of  peremptory
 
                            -2-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1    challenges as all of the defendants.
 2        (f)  After examination by the court  the  jurors  may  be
 3    examined,  passed  upon,  accepted  and  tendered by opposing
 4    counsel as provided by Supreme Court rules.
 5        (f-5)  In  its  discretion,  the  court  may  close   the
 6    courtroom to spectators during the process of jury selection.
 7    
 8        (g)  After  the jury is impaneled and sworn the court may
 9    direct the selection of 2 alternate jurors who shall take the
10    same oath as the regular jurors.  Each party shall  have  one
11    additional peremptory challenge for each alternate juror.  If
12    before  the  final submission of a cause a member of the jury
13    dies or is discharged he shall be replaced  by  an  alternate
14    juror in the order of selection.
15        (h)  A  trial by the court and jury shall be conducted in
16    the presence of the defendant unless he waives the  right  to
17    be present.
18        (i)  After  arguments of counsel the court shall instruct
19    the jury as to the law.
20        (j)  Unless the affirmative defense of insanity has  been
21    presented  during  the trial, the jury shall return a general
22    verdict as to each offense  charged.   When  the  affirmative
23    defense  of insanity has been presented during the trial, the
24    court shall provide the jury not only  with  general  verdict
25    forms  but  also with a special verdict form of not guilty by
26    reason of insanity, as to each offense charged, and  in  such
27    event  the  court  shall  separately instruct the jury that a
28    special verdict of not guilty by reason of  insanity  may  be
29    returned  instead  of  a  general  verdict  but  such special
30    verdict requires a unanimous finding by  the  jury  that  the
31    defendant  committed  the acts charged but at the time of the
32    commission of those acts the defendant was  insane.   In  the
33    event  of  a  verdict  of not guilty by reason of insanity, a
34    hearing shall be held  pursuant  to  the  Mental  Health  and
 
                            -3-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1    Developmental  Disabilities  Code  to  determine  whether the
 2    defendant is  subject  to  involuntary  admission.  When  the
 3    affirmative defense of insanity has been presented during the
 4    trial, the court, where warranted by the evidence, shall also
 5    provide  the  jury  with a special verdict form of guilty but
 6    mentally ill, as to each offense charged and shall separately
 7    instruct the jury  that  a  special  verdict  of  guilty  but
 8    mentally  ill  may  be returned instead of a general verdict,
 9    but that such special verdict requires a unanimous finding by
10    the jury that: (1) the State has proven beyond  a  reasonable
11    doubt  that  the  defendant is guilty of the offense charged;
12    and (2)  the defendant has failed to prove  his  insanity  as
13    required  in  subsection  (b)  of Section 3-2 of the Criminal
14    Code of 1961, as amended, and subsections (a), (b) and (e) of
15    Section 6-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961, as amended; and (3)
16    the defendant has proven by a preponderance of  the  evidence
17    that  he  was mentally ill, as defined in subsections (c) and
18    (d) of Section 6-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961, as  amended,
19    at the time of the offense.
20        (k)  When, at the close of the State's evidence or at the
21    close of all of the evidence, the evidence is insufficient to
22    support  a  finding or verdict of guilty the court may and on
23    motion of the defendant shall make a finding  or  direct  the
24    jury  to  return a verdict of not guilty, enter a judgment of
25    acquittal and discharge the defendant.
26        (l)  When the jury retires to  consider  its  verdict  an
27    officer of the court shall be appointed to keep them together
28    and  to  prevent  conversation between the jurors and others;
29    however, if any juror is deaf, the jury may be accompanied by
30    and may communicate with a court-appointed interpreter during
31    its deliberations.  Upon  agreement  between  the  State  and
32    defendant  or  his  counsel the jury may seal and deliver its
33    verdict to the clerk of the court, separate, and then  return
34    such verdict in open court at its next session.
 
                            -4-                LRB9105288DJpr
 1        (m)  In  the  trial  of  a  capital or other offense, any
 2    juror who is a member of a  panel  or  jury  which  has  been
 3    impaneled  and  sworn  as  a  panel  or  as  a  jury shall be
 4    permitted to separate from other  such  jurors  during  every
 5    period  of adjournment to a later day, until final submission
 6    of the cause to the jury for determination,  except  that  no
 7    such  separation  shall  be  permitted in any trial after the
 8    court, upon motion by the defendant or the State or upon  its
 9    own  motion,  finds  a  probability  that  prejudice  to  the
10    defendant or to the State will result from such separation.
11        (n)  The  members  of  the jury shall be entitled to take
12    notes during the trial, and the  sheriff  of  the  county  in
13    which  the  jury  is  sitting shall provide them with writing
14    materials  for  this  purpose.   Such  notes   shall   remain
15    confidential, and shall be destroyed by the sheriff after the
16    verdict has been returned or a mistrial declared.
17        (o)  A  defendant  tried by the court and jury shall only
18    be found guilty, guilty but mentally ill, not guilty  or  not
19    guilty  by  reason of insanity, upon the unanimous verdict of
20    the jury.
21    (Source: P.A. 86-392.)

[ Top ]