Full Text of HB4256 102nd General Assembly
HB4256sam001 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY | Sen. Julie A. Morrison Filed: 3/17/2022
| | 10200HB4256sam001 | | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL 4256
| 2 | | AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend House Bill 4256 by replacing | 3 | | everything after the enacting clause with the following:
| 4 | | "Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing | 5 | | Sections 24A-5 and 24A-15 as follows: | 6 | | (105 ILCS 5/24A-5) (from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5) | 7 | | Sec. 24A-5. Content of evaluation plans. This Section | 8 | | does not apply to teachers assigned to schools identified in | 9 | | an agreement entered into between the board of a school | 10 | | district operating under Article 34 of this Code and the | 11 | | exclusive representative of the district's teachers in | 12 | | accordance with Section 34-85c of this Code.
| 13 | | Each school district to
which this Article applies shall | 14 | | establish a teacher evaluation plan
which ensures that each | 15 | | teacher in contractual continued service
is evaluated at least | 16 | | once in the course of every 2 or 3 school years as provided in |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 2 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | this Section. | 2 | | Each school district shall establish a teacher evaluation | 3 | | plan that ensures that: | 4 | | (1) each teacher not in contractual continued service | 5 | | is evaluated at least once every school year; and | 6 | | (2) except as otherwise provided in this Section, each | 7 | | teacher in contractual continued service is evaluated at | 8 | | least once in the course of every 2 school years. However, | 9 | | any teacher in contractual continued service whose | 10 | | performance is rated as either "needs improvement" or | 11 | | "unsatisfactory" must be evaluated at least once in the | 12 | | school year following the receipt of such rating. | 13 | | No later than September 1, 2022, each school district must | 14 | | establish a teacher evaluation plan that ensures that each | 15 | | teacher in contractual continued service whose performance is | 16 | | rated as either "excellent" or "proficient" is evaluated at | 17 | | least once in the course of the 3 school years after receipt of | 18 | | the rating and implement an informal teacher observation plan | 19 | | established by agency rule and by agreement of the joint | 20 | | committee established under subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 of | 21 | | this Code that ensures that each teacher in contractual | 22 | | continued service whose performance is rated as either | 23 | | "excellent" or "proficient" is informally observed at least | 24 | | once in the course of the 2 school years after receipt of the | 25 | | rating. | 26 | | For the 2022-2023 school year only, if the Governor has |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 3 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | declared a disaster due to a public health emergency pursuant | 2 | | to Section 7 of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Act, | 3 | | a school district may waive the evaluation requirement of any | 4 | | teacher in contractual continued service whose performance was | 5 | | rated as either "excellent" or "proficient" during the last | 6 | | school year in which the teacher was evaluated under this | 7 | | Section. | 8 | | Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section | 9 | | or any other Section of this the School Code, a principal shall | 10 | | not be prohibited from evaluating any teachers within a school | 11 | | during his or her first year as principal of such school. If a | 12 | | first-year principal exercises this option in a school | 13 | | district where the evaluation plan provides for a teacher in | 14 | | contractual continued service to be evaluated once in the | 15 | | course of every 2 or 3 school years, as applicable, then a new | 16 | | 2-year or 3-year evaluation plan must be established. | 17 | | The evaluation plan shall comply with the requirements of | 18 | | this Section and
of any rules adopted by the State Board of | 19 | | Education pursuant to this Section. | 20 | | The plan shall include a description of each teacher's | 21 | | duties
and responsibilities and of the standards to which that | 22 | | teacher
is expected to conform, and shall include at least the | 23 | | following components: | 24 | | (a) personal observation of the teacher in the | 25 | | classroom by the evaluator, unless
the teacher has no | 26 | | classroom duties. |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 4 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | (b) consideration of the teacher's attendance, | 2 | | planning,
instructional methods, classroom management, | 3 | | where relevant, and
competency in the subject matter | 4 | | taught. | 5 | | (c) by no later than the applicable implementation | 6 | | date, consideration of student growth as a significant | 7 | | factor in the rating of the teacher's performance. | 8 | | (d) prior to September 1, 2012, rating of the | 9 | | performance of teachers in contractual continued service | 10 | | as either: | 11 | | (i) "excellent",
"satisfactory" or | 12 | | "unsatisfactory"; or | 13 | | (ii) "excellent", "proficient", "needs | 14 | | improvement" or "unsatisfactory". | 15 | | (e) on and after September 1, 2012, rating of the | 16 | | performance of all teachers as "excellent", "proficient", | 17 | | "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory". | 18 | | (f) specification as to the teacher's strengths and | 19 | | weaknesses, with
supporting reasons for the comments made. | 20 | | (g) inclusion of a copy of the evaluation in the | 21 | | teacher's personnel
file and provision of a copy to the | 22 | | teacher. | 23 | | (h) within 30 school days after the completion of an | 24 | | evaluation rating a teacher in contractual continued | 25 | | service as "needs improvement", development by the | 26 | | evaluator, in consultation with the teacher, and taking |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 5 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | into account the teacher's on-going professional | 2 | | responsibilities including his or her regular teaching | 3 | | assignments, of a professional development plan directed | 4 | | to the areas that need improvement and any supports that | 5 | | the district will provide to address the areas identified | 6 | | as needing improvement. | 7 | | (i) within 30 school days after completion of an | 8 | | evaluation rating a teacher
in contractual continued | 9 | | service as "unsatisfactory", development and commencement | 10 | | by the district of a remediation plan designed to correct | 11 | | deficiencies
cited, provided the deficiencies are deemed | 12 | | remediable.
In all school districts the
remediation plan | 13 | | for unsatisfactory, tenured teachers shall
provide for 90 | 14 | | school days of remediation within the
classroom, unless an | 15 | | applicable collective bargaining agreement provides for a | 16 | | shorter duration. In all school districts evaluations | 17 | | issued pursuant
to
this Section shall be
issued within 10 | 18 | | days after the conclusion of the respective remediation | 19 | | plan.
However, the school board or other governing | 20 | | authority of the district
shall not lose
jurisdiction to | 21 | | discharge a teacher in the event the evaluation is not | 22 | | issued
within 10 days after the conclusion of the | 23 | | respective remediation plan. | 24 | | (j) participation in the remediation plan by the | 25 | | teacher in contractual continued service rated
| 26 | | "unsatisfactory", an evaluator and a consulting teacher |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 6 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | selected by the evaluator of the teacher who was rated | 2 | | "unsatisfactory", which
consulting teacher is an | 3 | | educational employee as defined in the Educational
Labor | 4 | | Relations Act, has at least 5 years' teaching experience, | 5 | | and a
reasonable familiarity with the assignment of the | 6 | | teacher being evaluated,
and who received an "excellent" | 7 | | rating on his or her most
recent evaluation. Where no | 8 | | teachers who meet these criteria are available
within the | 9 | | district, the district shall request and the applicable | 10 | | regional office of education shall supply, to participate | 11 | | in the remediation process, an
individual who meets these | 12 | | criteria. | 13 | | In a district having a population of less than 500,000 | 14 | | with an
exclusive bargaining agent, the bargaining agent
| 15 | | may, if it so chooses, supply a roster of qualified | 16 | | teachers from whom the
consulting teacher is to be | 17 | | selected. That roster shall, however, contain
the names of | 18 | | at least 5 teachers, each of whom meets the criteria for
| 19 | | consulting teacher with regard to the teacher being | 20 | | evaluated, or the names
of all teachers so qualified if | 21 | | that number is less than 5. In the event of
a dispute as to | 22 | | qualification, the State Board shall determine | 23 | | qualification. | 24 | | (k) a mid-point and final evaluation by an evaluator | 25 | | during and at the end of the remediation period, | 26 | | immediately following receipt of a remediation plan |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 7 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | provided for under subsections (i) and (j) of this | 2 | | Section. Each evaluation shall assess the teacher's | 3 | | performance during the time period since the prior | 4 | | evaluation; provided that the last evaluation shall also | 5 | | include an overall evaluation of the teacher's performance | 6 | | during the remediation period. A written copy of the | 7 | | evaluations and ratings, in which any deficiencies in | 8 | | performance and recommendations for correction are | 9 | | identified, shall be provided to and discussed with the | 10 | | teacher within 10 school days after the date of the | 11 | | evaluation, unless an applicable collective bargaining | 12 | | agreement provides to the contrary. These subsequent | 13 | | evaluations
shall be conducted by an evaluator. The | 14 | | consulting
teacher shall provide advice to the teacher | 15 | | rated "unsatisfactory" on how
to improve teaching skills | 16 | | and to successfully complete the remediation
plan. The | 17 | | consulting teacher shall participate in developing the
| 18 | | remediation plan, but the final decision as to the | 19 | | evaluation shall be done
solely by the evaluator,
unless | 20 | | an applicable collective bargaining agreement provides to | 21 | | the contrary.
Evaluations at the
conclusion of the | 22 | | remediation process shall be separate and distinct from | 23 | | the
required annual evaluations of teachers and shall not | 24 | | be subject to the
guidelines and procedures relating to | 25 | | those annual evaluations. The evaluator
may but is not | 26 | | required to use the forms provided for the annual |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 8 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | evaluation of
teachers in the district's evaluation plan. | 2 | | (l)
reinstatement to the evaluation schedule set forth | 3 | | in the district's evaluation plan for any teacher in | 4 | | contractual continued service
who achieves a rating equal | 5 | | to or better than "satisfactory" or "proficient" in the | 6 | | school year following a rating of "needs improvement" or | 7 | | "unsatisfactory". | 8 | | (m) dismissal in accordance with subsection (d) of | 9 | | Section 24-12 or Section 24-16.5 or 34-85 of this
Code of | 10 | | any teacher who fails to complete any applicable | 11 | | remediation plan
with a rating equal to or better than a | 12 | | "satisfactory" or "proficient" rating. Districts and | 13 | | teachers subject to
dismissal hearings are precluded from | 14 | | compelling the testimony of
consulting teachers at such | 15 | | hearings under subsection (d) of Section 24-12 or Section | 16 | | 24-16.5 or 34-85 of this Code, either
as to the rating | 17 | | process or for opinions of performances by teachers under
| 18 | | remediation. | 19 | | (n) After the implementation date of an evaluation | 20 | | system for teachers in a district as specified in Section | 21 | | 24A-2.5 of this Code, if a teacher in contractual | 22 | | continued service successfully completes a remediation | 23 | | plan following a rating of "unsatisfactory" in an overall | 24 | | performance evaluation received after the foregoing | 25 | | implementation date and receives a subsequent rating of | 26 | | "unsatisfactory" in any of the teacher's overall |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 9 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | performance evaluation ratings received during the | 2 | | 36-month period following the teacher's completion of the | 3 | | remediation plan, then the school district may forego | 4 | | remediation and seek dismissal in accordance with | 5 | | subsection (d) of Section 24-12 or Section 34-85 of this | 6 | | Code. | 7 | | Nothing in this Section or Section 24A-4 shall be | 8 | | construed as preventing immediate
dismissal of a teacher for | 9 | | deficiencies which are
deemed irremediable or for actions | 10 | | which are injurious to or endanger the
health or person of | 11 | | students in the classroom or school, or preventing the | 12 | | dismissal or non-renewal of teachers not in contractual | 13 | | continued service for any reason not prohibited by applicable | 14 | | employment, labor, and civil rights laws. Failure to
strictly | 15 | | comply with the time requirements contained in Section 24A-5 | 16 | | shall
not invalidate the results of the remediation plan. | 17 | | Nothing contained in this amendatory Act of the 98th | 18 | | General Assembly repeals, supersedes, invalidates, or | 19 | | nullifies final decisions in lawsuits pending on the effective | 20 | | date of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly in | 21 | | Illinois courts involving the interpretation of Public Act | 22 | | 97-8. | 23 | | If the Governor has declared a disaster due to a public | 24 | | health emergency pursuant to Section 7 of the Illinois | 25 | | Emergency Management Agency Act that suspends in-person | 26 | | instruction, the timelines in this Section connected to the |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 10 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | commencement and completion of any remediation plan are | 2 | | waived. Except if the parties mutually agree otherwise and the | 3 | | agreement is in writing, any remediation plan that had been in | 4 | | place for more than 45 days prior to the suspension of | 5 | | in-person instruction shall resume when in-person instruction | 6 | | resumes and any remediation plan that had been in place for | 7 | | fewer than 45 days prior to the suspension of in-person | 8 | | instruction shall be discontinued and a new remediation period | 9 | | shall begin when in-person instruction resumes. The | 10 | | requirements of this paragraph apply regardless of whether | 11 | | they are included in a school district's teacher evaluation | 12 | | plan. | 13 | | (Source: P.A. 101-643, eff. 6-18-20; 102-252, eff. 1-1-22 .) | 14 | | (105 ILCS 5/24A-15) | 15 | | Sec. 24A-15. Development of evaluation plan for principals | 16 | | and assistant principals. | 17 | | (a) Each school district, except for a school district | 18 | | organized under Article 34 of this Code, shall establish a | 19 | | principal and assistant principal evaluation plan in | 20 | | accordance with this Section. The plan must ensure that each | 21 | | principal and assistant principal is evaluated as follows: | 22 | | (1) For a principal or assistant principal on a | 23 | | single-year contract, the evaluation must take place by | 24 | | March 1 of each year. | 25 | | (2) For a principal or assistant principal on a |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 11 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | multi-year contract under Section 10-23.8a of this Code, | 2 | | the evaluation must take place by March 1 of the final year | 3 | | of the contract. | 4 | | On and after September 1, 2012, the plan must: | 5 | | (i) rate the principal's or assistant principal's | 6 | | performance as "excellent", "proficient", "needs | 7 | | improvement" or "unsatisfactory"; and | 8 | | (ii) ensure that each principal and assistant | 9 | | principal is evaluated at least once every school year. | 10 | | Nothing in this Section prohibits a school district from | 11 | | conducting additional evaluations of principals and assistant | 12 | | principals.
| 13 | | For the 2022-2023 school year only, if the Governor has | 14 | | declared a disaster due to a public health emergency pursuant | 15 | | to Section 7 of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Act, | 16 | | a school district may waive the evaluation requirement of any | 17 | | principal or assistant principal whose performance was rated | 18 | | as either "excellent" or "proficient" during the last school | 19 | | year in which the principal or assistant principal was | 20 | | evaluated under this Section. | 21 | | (b) The evaluation shall include a description of the | 22 | | principal's or assistant principal's duties and | 23 | | responsibilities and the standards to which the principal or | 24 | | assistant principal is expected to conform. | 25 | | (c) The evaluation for a principal must be performed by | 26 | | the district superintendent, the superintendent's designee, |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 12 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | or, in the absence of the superintendent or his or her | 2 | | designee, an individual appointed by the school board who | 3 | | holds a registered Type 75 State administrative certificate. | 4 | | Prior to September 1, 2012, the evaluation must be in | 5 | | writing and must at least do all of the following: | 6 | | (1) Consider the principal's specific duties, | 7 | | responsibilities, management, and competence as a | 8 | | principal. | 9 | | (2) Specify the principal's strengths and weaknesses, | 10 | | with supporting reasons. | 11 | | (3) Align with research-based standards established by | 12 | | administrative rule.
| 13 | | On and after September 1, 2012, the evaluation must, in | 14 | | addition to the requirements in items (1), (2), and (3) of this | 15 | | subsection (c), provide for the use of data and indicators on | 16 | | student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. | 17 | | (c-5) The evaluation of an assistant principal must be | 18 | | performed by the principal, the district superintendent, the | 19 | | superintendent's designee, or, in the absence of the | 20 | | superintendent or his or her designee, an individual appointed | 21 | | by the school board who holds a registered Type 75 State | 22 | | administrative certificate. The evaluation must be in writing | 23 | | and must at least do all of the following: | 24 | | (1) Consider the assistant principal's specific | 25 | | duties, responsibilities, management, and competence as an | 26 | | assistant principal. |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 13 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | (2) Specify the assistant principal's strengths and | 2 | | weaknesses with supporting reasons. | 3 | | (3) Align with the Illinois Professional Standards for | 4 | | School Leaders or research-based district standards. | 5 | | On and after September 1, 2012, the evaluation must, in | 6 | | addition to the requirements in items (1), (2), and (3) of this | 7 | | subsection (c-5), provide for the use of data and indicators | 8 | | on student growth as a significant factor in rating | 9 | | performance. | 10 | | (d) One copy of the evaluation must be included in the | 11 | | principal's or assistant principal's personnel file and one | 12 | | copy of the evaluation must be provided to the principal or | 13 | | assistant principal. | 14 | | (e) Failure by a district to evaluate a principal or | 15 | | assistant principal and to provide the principal or assistant | 16 | | principal with a copy of the evaluation at least once during | 17 | | the term of the principal's or assistant principal's contract, | 18 | | in accordance with this Section, is evidence that the | 19 | | principal or assistant principal is performing duties and | 20 | | responsibilities in at least a satisfactory manner and shall | 21 | | serve to automatically extend the principal's or assistant | 22 | | principal's contract for a period of one year after the | 23 | | contract would otherwise expire, under the same terms and | 24 | | conditions as the prior year's contract. The requirements in | 25 | | this Section are in addition to the right of a school board to | 26 | | reclassify a principal or assistant principal pursuant to |
| | | 10200HB4256sam001 | - 14 - | LRB102 21733 NLB 37430 a |
|
| 1 | | Section 10-23.8b of this Code. | 2 | | (f) Nothing in this Section prohibits a school board from | 3 | | ordering lateral transfers of principals or assistant | 4 | | principals to positions of similar rank and salary.
| 5 | | (Source: P.A. 96-861, eff. 1-15-10; 97-217, eff. 7-28-11.)
| 6 | | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | 7 | | becoming law.".
|
|