HB0386enr 101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY



 


 
HB0386 EnrolledLRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1    AN ACT concerning criminal law.
 
2    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
 
4    Section 5. The Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009 is
5amended by changing Section 10 as follows:
 
6    (730 ILCS 190/10)
7    Sec. 10. Evidence-Based Programming.
8    (a) Purpose. Research and practice have identified new
9strategies and policies that can result in a significant
10reduction in recidivism rates and the successful local
11reintegration of offenders. The purpose of this Section is to
12ensure that State and local agencies direct their resources to
13services and programming that have been demonstrated to be
14effective in reducing recidivism and reintegrating offenders
15into the locality.
16    (b) Evidence-based programming in local supervision.
17        (1) The Parole Division of the Department of
18    Corrections and the Prisoner Review Board shall adopt
19    policies, rules, and regulations that, within the first
20    year of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
21    statewide, standardized risk assessment tool described in
22    this Act, result in at least 25% of supervised individuals
23    being supervised in accordance with evidence-based

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 2 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1    practices; within 3 years of the adoption, validation, and
2    utilization of the statewide, standardized risk assessment
3    tool result in at least 50% of supervised individuals being
4    supervised in accordance with evidence-based practices;
5    and within 5 years of the adoption, validation, and
6    utilization of the statewide, standardized risk assessment
7    tool result in at least 75% of supervised individuals being
8    supervised in accordance with evidence-based practices.
9    The policies, rules, and regulations shall:
10            (A) Provide for a standardized individual case
11        plan that follows the offender through the criminal
12        justice system (including in-prison if the supervised
13        individual is in prison) that is:
14                (i) Based on the assets of the individual as
15            well as his or her risks and needs identified
16            through the assessment tool as described in this
17            Act.
18                (ii) Comprised of treatment and supervision
19            services appropriate to achieve the purpose of
20            this Act.
21                (iii) Consistently updated, based on program
22            participation by the supervised individual and
23            other behavior modification exhibited by the
24            supervised individual.
25            (B) Concentrate resources and services on
26        high-risk offenders.

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 3 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1            (C) Provide for the use of evidence-based
2        programming related to education, job training,
3        cognitive behavioral therapy, and other programming
4        designed to reduce criminal behavior.
5            (D) Establish a system of graduated responses.
6                (i) The system shall set forth a menu of
7            presumptive responses for the most common types of
8            supervision violations.
9                (ii) The system shall be guided by the model
10            list of intermediate sanctions created by the
11            Probation Services Division of the State of
12            Illinois pursuant to subsection (1) of Section 15
13            of the Probation and Probation Officers Act and the
14            system of intermediate sanctions created by the
15            Chief Judge of each circuit court pursuant to
16            Section 5-6-1 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
17                (iii) The system of responses shall take into
18            account factors such as the severity of the current
19            violation; the supervised individual's risk level
20            as determined by a validated assessment tool
21            described in this Act; the supervised individual's
22            assets; his or her previous criminal record; and
23            the number and severity of any previous
24            supervision violations.
25                (iv) The system shall also define positive
26            reinforcements that supervised individuals may

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 4 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1            receive for compliance with conditions of
2            supervision.
3                (v) Response to violations should be swift and
4            certain and should be imposed as soon as
5            practicable but no longer than 3 working days of
6            detection of the violation behavior.
7        (2) Conditions of local supervision (probation and
8    mandatory supervised release). Conditions of local
9    supervision whether imposed by a sentencing judge or the
10    Prisoner Review Board shall be imposed in accordance with
11    the offender's risks, assets, and needs as identified
12    through the assessment tool described in this Act.
13        (3) The Department of Corrections and the Prisoner
14    Review Board shall annually publish an exemplar copy of any
15    evidence-based assessments, questionnaires, or other
16    instruments used to set conditions of release.
17    (c) Evidence-based in-prison programming.
18        (1) The Department of Corrections shall adopt
19    policies, rules, and regulations that, within the first
20    year of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
21    statewide, standardized risk assessment tool described in
22    this Act, result in at least 25% of incarcerated
23    individuals receiving services and programming in
24    accordance with evidence-based practices; within 3 years
25    of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
26    statewide, standardized risk assessment tool result in at

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 5 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1    least 50% of incarcerated individuals receiving services
2    and programming in accordance with evidence-based
3    practices; and within 5 years of the adoption, validation,
4    and utilization of the statewide, standardized risk
5    assessment tool result in at least 75% of incarcerated
6    individuals receiving services and programming in
7    accordance with evidence-based practices. The policies,
8    rules, and regulations shall:
9            (A) Provide for the use and development of a case
10        plan based on the risks, assets, and needs identified
11        through the assessment tool as described in this Act.
12        The case plan should be used to determine in-prison
13        programming; should be continuously updated based on
14        program participation by the prisoner and other
15        behavior modification exhibited by the prisoner; and
16        should be used when creating the case plan described in
17        subsection (b).
18            (B) Provide for the use of evidence-based
19        programming related to education, job training,
20        cognitive behavioral therapy and other evidence-based
21        programming.
22            (C) Establish education programs based on a
23        teacher to student ratio of no more than 1:30.
24            (D) Expand the use of drug prisons, modeled after
25        the Sheridan Correctional Center, to provide
26        sufficient drug treatment and other support services

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 6 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1        to non-violent inmates with a history of substance
2        abuse.
3        (2) Participation and completion of programming by
4    prisoners can impact earned time credit as determined under
5    Section 3-6-3 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
6        (3) The Department of Corrections shall provide its
7    employees with intensive and ongoing training and
8    professional development services to support the
9    implementation of evidence-based practices. The training
10    and professional development services shall include
11    assessment techniques, case planning, cognitive behavioral
12    training, risk reduction and intervention strategies,
13    effective communication skills, substance abuse treatment
14    education and other topics identified by the Department or
15    its employees.
16    (d) The Parole Division of the Department of Corrections
17and the Prisoner Review Board shall provide their employees
18with intensive and ongoing training and professional
19development services to support the implementation of
20evidence-based practices. The training and professional
21development services shall include assessment techniques, case
22planning, cognitive behavioral training, risk reduction and
23intervention strategies, effective communication skills,
24substance abuse treatment education, and other topics
25identified by the agencies or their employees.
26    (e) The Department of Corrections, the Prisoner Review

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 7 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1Board, and other correctional entities referenced in the
2policies, rules, and regulations of this Act shall design,
3implement, and make public a system to evaluate the
4effectiveness of evidence-based practices in increasing public
5safety and in successful reintegration of those under
6supervision into the locality. Annually, each agency shall
7submit to the Sentencing Policy Advisory Council a
8comprehensive report on the success of implementing
9evidence-based practices. The data compiled and analyzed by the
10Council shall be delivered annually to the Governor and the
11General Assembly.
12    (f) The Department of Corrections and the Prisoner Review
13Board shall release a report annually published on their
14websites that reports the following information about the usage
15of electronic monitoring and GPS monitoring as a condition of
16parole and mandatory supervised release during the prior
17calendar year:
18        (1) demographic data of individuals on electronic
19    monitoring and GPS monitoring, separated by the following
20    categories:
21            (A) race or ethnicity;
22            (B) gender; and
23            (C) age;
24        (2) incarceration data of individuals subject to
25    conditions of electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by
26    the following categories:

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 8 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1            (A) highest class of offense for which the
2        individuals is currently serving a term of release; and
3            (B) length of imprisonment served prior to the
4        current release period;
5        (3) the number of individuals subject to conditions of
6    electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the following
7    categories:
8            (A) the number of individuals subject to
9        monitoring under Section 5-8A-6 of the Unified Code of
10        Corrections;
11            (B) the number of individuals subject monitoring
12        under Section 5-8A-7 of the Unified Code of
13        Corrections;
14            (C) the number of individuals subject to
15        monitoring under a discretionary order of the Prisoner
16        Review Board at the time of their release; and
17            (D) the number of individuals subject to
18        monitoring as a sanction for violations of parole or
19        mandatory supervised release, separated by the
20        following categories:
21                (i) the number of individuals subject to
22            monitoring as part of a graduated sanctions
23            program; and
24                (ii) the number of individuals subject to
25            monitoring as a new condition of re-release after a
26            revocation hearing before the Prisoner Review

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 9 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1            Board;
2        (4) the number of discretionary monitoring orders
3    issued by the Prisoner Review Board, separated by the
4    following categories:
5            (A) less than 30 days;
6            (B) 31 to 60 days;
7            (C) 61 to 90 days;
8            (D) 91 to 120 days;
9            (E) 121 to 150 days;
10            (F) 151 to 180 days;
11            (G) 181 to 364 days;
12            (H) 365 days or more; and
13            (I) duration of release term;
14        (5) the number of discretionary monitoring orders by
15    the Board which removed or terminated monitoring prior to
16    the completion of the original period ordered;
17        (6) the number and severity category for sanctions
18    imposed on individuals on electronic or GPS monitoring,
19    separated by the following categories:
20            (A) absconding from electronic monitoring or GPS;
21            (B) tampering or removing the electronic
22        monitoring or GPS device;
23            (C) unauthorized leaving of the residence;
24            (D) presence of the individual in a prohibited
25        area; or
26            (E) other violations of the terms of the electronic

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 10 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1        monitoring program;
2        (7) the number of individuals for whom a parole
3    revocation case was filed for failure to comply with the
4    terms of electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the
5    following categories:
6            (A) cases when failure to comply with the terms of
7        monitoring was the sole violation alleged; and
8            (B) cases when failure to comply with the terms of
9        monitoring was alleged in conjunction with other
10        alleged violations;
11        (8) residential data for individuals subject to
12    electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the following
13    categories:
14            (A) the county of the residence address for
15        individuals subject to electronic or GPS monitoring as
16        a condition of their release; and
17            (B) for counties with a population over 3,000,000,
18        the zip codes of the residence address for individuals
19        subject to electronic or GPS monitoring as a condition
20        of their release;
21        (9) the number of individuals for whom parole
22    revocation cases were filed due to violations of paragraph
23    (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the Unified Code
24    of Corrections, separated by the following categories:
25            (A) the number of individuals whose violation of
26        paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the

 

 

HB0386 Enrolled- 11 -LRB101 03664 SLF 48672 b

1        Unified Code of Corrections allegedly occurred while
2        the individual was subject to conditions of electronic
3        or GPS monitoring;
4            (B) the number of individuals who had violations of
5        paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the
6        Unified Code of Corrections alleged against them who
7        were never subject to electronic or GPS monitoring
8        during their current term of release; and
9            (C) the number of individuals who had violations of
10        paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the
11        Unified Code of Corrections alleged against them who
12        were subject to electronic or GPS monitoring for any
13        period of time during their current term of their
14        release, but who were not subject to such monitoring at
15        the time of the alleged violation of paragraph (1) of
16        subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the Unified Code of
17        Corrections.
18(Source: P.A. 96-761, eff. 1-1-10.)