|
| | 100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2017 and 2018 HB2953 Introduced , by Rep. Arthur Turner SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
| 70 ILCS 3615/4.06 | from Ch. 111 2/3, par. 704.06 |
|
Amends the Regional Transportation Authority Act. Provides that the Regional Transportation Authority Board shall adopt regulations to ensure that the construction or acquisition by the Authority or a Service Board other than the Chicago Transit Authority of services or public transportation facilities (other than real estate) involving a cost of more than the small purchase threshold set by the Federal Transit Administration (rather than $40,000) shall be after public notice and with public bidding. Effective immediately.
|
| |
| | | FISCAL NOTE ACT MAY APPLY | |
| | A BILL FOR |
|
|
| | HB2953 | | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | AN ACT concerning government.
|
2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
3 | | represented in the General Assembly:
|
4 | | Section 5. The Regional Transportation Authority Act is |
5 | | amended by changing Section 4.06 as follows:
|
6 | | (70 ILCS 3615/4.06) (from Ch. 111 2/3, par. 704.06)
|
7 | | Sec. 4.06. Public bidding.
|
8 | | (a) The Board shall adopt regulations to ensure
that the |
9 | | construction or acquisition by the Authority or a Service Board
|
10 | | other than the Chicago Transit Authority of services or public
|
11 | | transportation facilities (other than real estate) involving a |
12 | | cost of more
than the small purchase threshold set by the |
13 | | Federal Transit Administration $40,000 and the disposition of |
14 | | all property of the Authority or a
Service Board other than the |
15 | | Chicago Transit Authority shall be after
public notice and with |
16 | | public bidding. Such regulations may provide for
exceptions to |
17 | | such requirements for acquisition of repair parts, |
18 | | accessories,
equipment or services previously furnished or |
19 | | contracted for; for the
immediate delivery of supplies, |
20 | | material or equipment or performance of
service when it is |
21 | | determined by the concurrence of two-thirds of the then
|
22 | | Directors that an emergency requires immediate delivery or |
23 | | supply thereof;
for goods or services that are economically |
|
| | HB2953 | - 2 - | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | procurable from only one
source; for contracts for the |
2 | | maintenance or servicing of equipment which
are made with the |
3 | | manufacturers or authorized service agent of that
equipment |
4 | | where the maintenance or servicing can best be performed by the
|
5 | | manufacturer or authorized service agent or such a contract |
6 | | would be
otherwise advantageous to the Authority or a Service |
7 | | Board, other
than the Chicago Transit Authority, except that |
8 | | the exceptions in this
clause shall not apply to contracts for |
9 | | plumbing, heating, piping,
refrigeration and automatic |
10 | | temperature control systems, ventilating and
distribution |
11 | | systems for conditioned air, and electrical wiring; for goods
|
12 | | or services procured from another governmental agency; for |
13 | | purchases and
contracts for the use or purchase of data |
14 | | processing equipment and data
processing systems software; for |
15 | | the acquisition of professional or
utility services; and for |
16 | | the acquisition of public transportation
equipment including, |
17 | | but not limited to, rolling stock, locomotives and
buses, |
18 | | provided that: (i) it is determined by a vote of 2/3 of the |
19 | | then
Directors of the Service Board making the acquisition that |
20 | | a negotiated
acquisition offers opportunities with respect to |
21 | | the cost or financing of
the equipment, its delivery, or the |
22 | | performance of a portion of the work
within the State or the |
23 | | use of goods produced or
services provided within the State; |
24 | | (ii) a notice of intention to negotiate
for the acquisition of |
25 | | such public transportation equipment is published in
a |
26 | | newspaper of general circulation within the City of Chicago |
|
| | HB2953 | - 3 - | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | inviting
proposals from qualified vendors; and (iii) any |
2 | | contract with respect to
such acquisition is authorized by a |
3 | | vote of 2/3 of the then Directors of
the Service Board making |
4 | | the acquisition. The requirements set forth
in this Section |
5 | | shall not apply to purchase of service
agreements or other
|
6 | | contracts, purchases or sales entered into by the Authority |
7 | | with any
transportation agency or unit of local government.
|
8 | | (b) (1) In connection with two-phase design/build |
9 | | selection procedures
authorized in this Section, a Service |
10 | | Board may authorize, by
the affirmative vote of two-thirds of |
11 | | the then members of the
Service Board, the use of competitive |
12 | | selection and the prequalification of
responsible bidders |
13 | | consistent with applicable federal regulations and this
|
14 | | subsection (b).
|
15 | | (2) Two-phase design/build selection procedures shall |
16 | | consist of the
following:
|
17 | | (i) A Service Board shall develop, through |
18 | | licensed
architects or licensed engineers, a scope of |
19 | | work statement for inclusion in
the solicitation for |
20 | | phase-one proposals that defines the project and |
21 | | provides
prospective offerors with sufficient |
22 | | information regarding the
Service Board's |
23 | | requirements. The statement shall include criteria and
|
24 | | preliminary design, and general budget parameters and |
25 | | general schedule or
delivery requirements
to enable |
26 | | the offerors to submit proposals which meet the
Service |
|
| | HB2953 | - 4 - | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | Board's needs.
When the two-phase design/build |
2 | | selection procedure is used and the
Service Board |
3 | | contracts for development of the scope of work |
4 | | statement, the
Service Board shall contract for |
5 | | architectural or engineering
services as defined by |
6 | | and in accordance with the Architectural, Engineering,
|
7 | | and Land Surveying Qualifications Based Selection Act |
8 | | and all applicable
licensing statutes.
|
9 | | (ii) The evaluation factors to be used in |
10 | | evaluating phase-one proposals
must be stated in the |
11 | | solicitation and must include specialized experience |
12 | | and
technical competence, capability to perform, past |
13 | | performance of the offeror's
team (including the |
14 | | architect-engineer and construction members of the |
15 | | team)
and other appropriate technical and |
16 | | qualifications factors. Each solicitation
must |
17 | | establish the relative importance assigned to the |
18 | | evaluation factors and
the subfactors that must be |
19 | | considered in the evaluation of phase-one proposals
on |
20 | | the basis of the evaluation factors set forth in the |
21 | | solicitation. Each
design/build team must include a |
22 | | licensed design professional independent from
the |
23 | | Service Board's licensed architect or engineer and a
|
24 | | licensed design professional must be named in the |
25 | | phase-one proposals submitted
to the
Service Board.
|
26 | | (iii) On the basis of the phase-one proposal the |
|
| | HB2953 | - 5 - | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | Service
Board shall select as the most highly qualified |
2 | | the number of offerors
specified in the solicitation |
3 | | and request the selected offerors to submit
phase-two |
4 | | competitive proposals and cost or price information. |
5 | | Each
solicitation must establish the relative |
6 | | importance assigned to the evaluation
factors and the |
7 | | subfactors that must be considered in the evaluation of
|
8 | | phase-two proposals on the basis of the evaluation |
9 | | factors set forth in the
solicitation. A Service Board |
10 | | may negotiate with the selected
design/build team |
11 | | after award but prior to contract execution for the |
12 | | purpose
of securing better terms than originally |
13 | | proposed, provided the salient
features of the |
14 | | design/build solicitation are not diminished. Each |
15 | | phase-two
solicitation evaluates separately (A) the |
16 | | technical submission for the
proposal, including |
17 | | design concepts or proposed solutions to requirements
|
18 | | addressed within the scope of work, and (B) the |
19 | | evaluation factors and
subfactors, including cost or |
20 | | price, that must be considered in the evaluations
of |
21 | | proposals.
|
22 | | (iv) A design/build solicitation issued under the |
23 | | procedures in this
subsection (b) shall state the |
24 | | maximum number of offerors that are to be
selected to |
25 | | submit competitive phase-two proposals. The maximum |
26 | | number
specified in the solicitation shall not exceed 5 |
|
| | HB2953 | - 6 - | LRB100 10637 AWJ 20860 b |
|
|
1 | | unless the
Service Board with respect to an individual |
2 | | solicitation determines that a
specified number |
3 | | greater than 5 is in the best interest of the
Service |
4 | | Board and is consistent with the purposes and |
5 | | objectives of the
two-phase design/build selection |
6 | | process.
|
7 | | (v) All designs submitted as part of the two-phase |
8 | | selection process and
not selected shall be |
9 | | proprietary to the preparers.
|
10 | | (Source: P.A. 98-1156, eff. 1-9-15.)
|
11 | | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
12 | | becoming law.
|