Full Text of SR0891 103rd General Assembly
SR0891 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY | | | SR0891 | | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | SENATE RESOLUTION | 2 | | WHEREAS, In August 1993, a Memorandum of Agreement | 3 | | (Agreement) was executed to recognize that the Illinois | 4 | | Shoreline Erosion Interim 3 Project (Project) would affect | 5 | | portions of the Chicago shoreline that are historic properties | 6 | | listed or eligible for listing on the U.S. National Register | 7 | | of Historic Places (NRHP); and | 8 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement prioritizes the preservation of the | 9 | | historic properties and elements on the shoreline, with repair | 10 | | and rehabilitation to be performed consistent with the | 11 | | Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of | 12 | | Historic Properties and Guidelines for the Treatment of | 13 | | Cultural Landscapes (SOI standards), and aims for a design | 14 | | plan that would lead to a finding of No Adverse Effects (NAE) | 15 | | by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO); and | 16 | | WHEREAS, The Chicago District of the U.S. Army Corps of | 17 | | Engineers (USACE) has consulted with the Advisory Council on | 18 | | Historic Preservation (ACHP) and SHPO pursuant to 36 CFR Part | 19 | | 800 and Section 106 of the 1965 National Historic Preservation | 20 | | Act to define the Agreement and prioritize the protection of | 21 | | the historic properties at Promontory Point so that the | 22 | | designs and planning for the shoreline management developed | 23 | | for Promontory Point would allow for a finding of No Adverse |
| | | SR0891 | - 2 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | Effect (NAE); and | 2 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement requires amending because the | 3 | | construction and rehabilitation of the Promontory Point reach | 4 | | of the original Project was not completed; and | 5 | | WHEREAS, A major component of the uncompleted Project is | 6 | | Promontory Point, a 40-acre peninsula at the south end of | 7 | | Burnham Park, Chicago, comprising the Area of Potential | 8 | | Effects (APE), herein referred to as the "Undertaking"; and | 9 | | WHEREAS, The scope of the Undertaking includes the | 10 | | pre-design, review, design planning, construction, and | 11 | | maintenance of the step-stone limestone revetment and | 12 | | promenade at Promontory Point for erosion control and storm | 13 | | damage management, and it specifically includes the repair and | 14 | | rehabilitation of the step-stone limestone revetment and | 15 | | promenade at Promontory Point, approximately 3,200 linear feet | 16 | | of shoreline between East 54th and 56th Streets; and | 17 | | WHEREAS, The step-stone limestone revetment and promenade | 18 | | at Promontory Point is now subject to the continuation and | 19 | | funding of the Project consistent with the Agreement and the | 20 | | SOI standards; and | 21 | | WHEREAS, Section 8336 of the Water Resources Development |
| | | SR0891 | - 3 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | Act (WRDA) of 2022 in the National Defense Authorization Act | 2 | | for Fiscal Year 2023 appropriates funding to finish the | 3 | | uncompleted sections of the shoreline Project, including | 4 | | Promontory Point; the 2022 Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law, | 5 | | Public Law 117-58, funds an internal, third-party review of | 6 | | Promontory Point; also, a City of Chicago (City) 2023 capital | 7 | | bond funds a $5m design and planning contract for Promontory | 8 | | Point; and | 9 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement also necessitates amendment because | 10 | | of the 24-year history of commitment and involvement by the | 11 | | local and City-wide community to seek a genuine preservation | 12 | | outcome at Promontory Point; and | 13 | | WHEREAS, On June 21, 2002, SHPO issued a letter providing | 14 | | its refusal to issue a finding of NAE in regards to proposed | 15 | | activities at Promontory Point for the Lake Michigan Shoreline | 16 | | Protection, as recorded under IPHA log #109170043WCK; and | 17 | | WHEREAS, The Agreement and SHPO's June 21, 2002 letter | 18 | | specify repair and rehabilitation to match the existing | 19 | | step-stone limestone revetment and promenade and to minimize | 20 | | impacts to the historic resources at Promontory Point under | 21 | | the SOI standards; and | 22 | | WHEREAS, Discussions led by then-Senator Obama with the |
| | | SR0891 | - 4 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | USACE, the City of Chicago, the Chicago Park District (CPD), | 2 | | SHPO, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), | 3 | | and the consulting parties led to the 2006 Obama Scope of Work, | 4 | | which provided an agreed-upon path forward for a preservation | 5 | | approach and community engagement process to design planning | 6 | | and construction at Promontory Point; and | 7 | | WHEREAS, Section 5072 of the WRDA of 2007 directed but | 8 | | never funded a third-party, unbiased, independent preservation | 9 | | feasibility and cost analysis study of Promontory Point to be | 10 | | supervised by the Buffalo and Seattle offices of the USACE but | 11 | | was not deemed an element of the Project; and | 12 | | WHEREAS, Other third-party, independent marine engineering | 13 | | studies in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2024 all demonstrated that | 14 | | Promontory Point remains functioning and operational for storm | 15 | | damage and shoreline protection, and that a preservation | 16 | | approach to repairing the step-stone limestone revetment and | 17 | | promenade can meet erosion control and storm damage protection | 18 | | requirements; and | 19 | | WHEREAS, Promontory Point was listed in the National | 20 | | Register of Historic Places (NRHP) on January 19, 2018, and it | 21 | | was designated a City of Chicago Landmark on April 19, 2023; | 22 | | and |
| | | SR0891 | - 5 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | WHEREAS, The significant historic features of Promontory | 2 | | Point are identified as the pavilion field house, including | 3 | | its pathways, the meadow, and original plantings, four council | 4 | | rings, the step-stone limestone revetment, the promenade, the | 5 | | 55th Street underpass and its porticos, and the David Wallach | 6 | | Fountain; and | 7 | | WHEREAS, There are multiple conditions for the several | 8 | | elements of the structure of the revetment at Promontory | 9 | | Point, including the immediate parkland, the step-stone | 10 | | revetment, the promenade, the promenade sub-grade, and the | 11 | | timber cribbing; and | 12 | | WHEREAS, The SOI standards provide for numerous treatments | 13 | | and solutions to address the multiple conditions of the | 14 | | limestone revetment and its structural elements at various | 15 | | locations and sections of Promontory Point; and | 16 | | WHEREAS, Preserving the step-stone limestone revetment and | 17 | | promenade preserves the multi-generational, racial, and | 18 | | economic class community that has gathered at Promontory Point | 19 | | for almost 100 years; therefore, be it | 20 | | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDRED THIRD GENERAL | 21 | | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we support the | 22 | | legitimate Community Preservation Plan for Promontory Point, |
| | | SR0891 | - 6 - | LRB103 39894 LAW 70886 r |
|
| 1 | | Burnham Park, Chicago; and be it further | 2 | | RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be | 3 | | delivered to Promontory Point Conservancy. |
|