Illinois General Assembly - Bill Status for HB3532
Illinois General Assembly

Previous General Assemblies

 Bill Status of HB3532  93rd General Assembly


Short Description:  COUNTY JAIL-IDOC REIMBURSEMENT

House Sponsors
Rep. Marlow H. Colvin - Calvin L. Giles - Kenneth Dunkin

Senate Sponsors
(Sen. Donne E. Trotter)

Last Action
DateChamber Action
  1/11/2005HouseSession Sine Die

Statutes Amended In Order of Appearance
730 ILCS 125/5from Ch. 75, par. 105


Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the County Jail Act. Provides that if a person who has been convicted of a felony or who has violated mandatory supervised release is incarcerated in a county jail, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall pay the county in which that jail is located $59 for each day the person remains in the county jail after the fifteenth day after receipt of the documentation from the clerk of the court authorizing the person's transfer to the State facility to which he or she has been sentenced.

House Committee Amendment No. 1
Deletes the existing substantive provisions. Provides instead that if a person who has been convicted of a felony and has violated mandatory supervised release for that felony is incarcerated in a county jail pending the resolution of the violation of mandatory supervised release, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall pay the county in which that jail is located one-half of the cost of incarceration, as calculated by the Illinois Bureau of the Budget and the county's chief financial officer, for each day that the person remains in the county jail. Provides that calculation of the per diem cost shall be agreed upon prior to the passage of the annual State budget.

 Correctional Note (H-AM 1) ( Department of Corrections)
 House Bill 3532, as amended by House Amendment #1, would make the Department pay for each county one-half of the cost of incarceration for each person who has violated mandatory supervised release (MSR) and remains in the county jail pending resolution of the mandatory supervised release violation. This enhancement would not add inmates to the prison population. However, this enhancement would result in an increase of $4,718,820 in additional costs over the first ten years after enactment.

Actions 
DateChamber Action
  2/28/2003HouseFiled with the Clerk by Rep. Marlow H. Colvin
  2/28/2003HouseFirst Reading
  2/28/2003HouseReferred to Rules Committee
  3/5/2003HouseAssigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
  3/13/2003HouseHouse Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
  3/13/2003HouseHouse Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; by Voice Vote
  3/13/2003HouseDo Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 013-000-000
  3/13/2003HousePlaced on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
  3/18/2003HouseCorrectional Note Filed as amended by House Amendment No. 1
  3/18/2003HouseSecond Reading - Short Debate
  3/18/2003HousePlaced on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
  3/20/2003HouseAdded Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Calvin L. Giles
  3/20/2003HouseAdded Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Kenneth Dunkin
  3/20/2003HouseThird Reading - Short Debate - Passed 085-003-026
  3/21/2003SenateArrive in Senate
  3/21/2003SenatePlaced on Calendar Order of First Reading March 24, 2003
  4/3/2003SenateChief Senate Sponsor Sen. Donne E. Trotter
  4/8/2003SenateFirst Reading
  4/8/2003SenateReferred to Rules
  1/11/2005HouseSession Sine Die

Back To Top