SR0541LRB103 34974 ECR 64868 r

1
SENATE RESOLUTION

 
2    WHEREAS, State law forces contractors who do construction
3for government agencies to lend money back to their government
4clients at a zero percent interest rate pursuant to retention
5laws; and
 
6    WHEREAS, Under retention laws, for every pay period after
7the project bill is approved, the government agency pays only
890% of the bill; and
 
9    WHEREAS, The government agency keeps 10% of the bill,
10which is known as the retention or retainage; and
 
11    WHEREAS, The government agency will pay back this forced
12loan months or even years after the contractor has performed
13the work and paid for all the supplies and labor required; and
 
14    WHEREAS, The forced loan of retainage has an enormous
15impact on contractors' ability to grow; and
 
16    WHEREAS, Instead of improving access to capital, the
17retention law drains capital from employers; and
 
18    WHEREAS, Defenders of retention laws argue that without
19the leverage of keeping the contractors in debt from the costs

 

 

SR0541- 2 -LRB103 34974 ECR 64868 r

1they have incurred for doing the approved work for agencies,
2the agencies wouldn't be able to require contractors to
3perform to the agencies' satisfaction; and
 
4    WHEREAS, Agencies have many other tools to manage
5contractors, including, but not limited to, their existing
6vigorous approval and verification process for every pay
7period or invoice, liquidated damages clauses if a contractor
8doesn't perform, warranties on all work performed by
9contractors, and a more nuanced contract for those few
10circumstances where the quality of the work needs to be
11verified later; and
 
12    WHEREAS, Retention takes 10% of the contract value from
13all contractors as a forced loan from everyone, whether the
14subcontractor simply delivered materials or the prime
15contractor is working on a complicated project that needs some
16later examination; and
 
17    WHEREAS, Under State law, this forced loan drops to 5% of
18the contract value halfway through the project until close
19out, a paperwork exercise that can take months after the work
20is performed; and
 
21    WHEREAS, Sometimes, government agencies are understaffed
22and aren't able to close out a project in a reasonable period

 

 

SR0541- 3 -LRB103 34974 ECR 64868 r

1of time, or some required paperwork isn't in from one vendor,
2leading all the contractors to suffer with a forced loan until
3the agency is satisfied; and
 
4    WHEREAS, Retention is a punishing, blunt, and expensive
5policy; and
 
6    WHEREAS, Subcontractors will regularly and successfully
7complete major work, fronting all the money for supplies and
8labor, only to be caught waiting for the prime contractor to
9pay out while they muddle through a retention dispute with a
10government agency, putting the subcontractor in debt;
11therefore, be it
 
12    RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDRED THIRD GENERAL
13ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we urge all
14stakeholders and policymakers to collaborate and consider how
15to best upgrade public works law in 2024 from the
16across-the-board, capital-draining policy of retention that
17takes money from all contractors on all projects to a more
18efficient, nuanced, and tailored approach that protects
19government agencies without forcing cash-strapped contractors
20to go into debt by providing no interest loans to their
21government clients.