<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<xml>
<title>Illinois General Assembly - Bill Status for SB 481    </title>
<shortdesc>PROBATE- STAT CUSTODIAL CLAIM</shortdesc>
<sponsor>
<sponsorhead1>Senate Sponsors</sponsorhead1><sponsors>Sen. Don Harmon-Donne E. Trotter-Jacqueline Y. Collins</sponsors>
<sponsorhead2>House Sponsors</sponsorhead2><altsponsors>(Rep. John A. Fritchey)</altsponsors>
</sponsor>
<lastaction>
<statusdate>8/20/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0315</action>
</lastaction>
<synopsis>
<synopsistitle></synopsistitle>
<reference>755 ILCS 5/18-1.1</reference><aliasreference>from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 18-1.1</aliasreference><SynopsisText>Amends the Probate Act of 1975. Provides that a statutory custodial claim against the estate of a deceased disabled person made by a close relative of the disabled person who cared for the disabled person by living with and personally caring for the disabled person for at least 3 years is based on the degree of the person's disability, as follows: 100% disability $180,000 (at present, $100,000); 75% disability $135,000 (at present, $75,000); 50% disability $90,000 (at present, $50,000); and 25% disability $45,000 (at present, $25,000).</SynopsisText><synopsistitle>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1</synopsistitle>
<reftype>Adds reference to:</reftype><reference>755 ILCS 5/2-6.2</reference><aliasreference></aliasreference><SynopsisText>Replaces everything after the enacting clause with substantially similar provisions except for the following: (1) provides that a person convicted of financial exploitation shall not receive payment for a statutory custodial claim (instead of a person may not receive property or a benefit as an heir, legatee, beneficiary, survivor, appointee, or in any other capacity); (2) provides that a statutory custodial claim may be reduced if the relative's living arrangements with the decedent were intended to and did in fact also provide a physical, emotional, or financial benefit to the claimant; and (3) provides that factors that the court may consider in determining whether to reduce a statutory custodial claim amount are any benefits furnished to the claimant including: free housing or the low cost of housing; alleviation of the need to be employed full time; any financial benefit; emotional benefits; personal care furnished by the decedent; and the proximity of the care provided by the claimant to the decedent to the time of the decedent's death.</SynopsisText><synopsistitle>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2</synopsistitle>
<SynopsisText>Deletes language providing that a court may reduce a statutory custodial claim to the extent that the claimant's living arrangements with the decedent were intended to and did, in fact, provide an emotional benefit to the claimant. Deletes language providing that a court may, when determining whether to reduce a statutory custodial claim, consider the emotional benefits received by the claimant.</SynopsisText></synopsis>
<actions>
<statusdate>2/8/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Filed with Secretary by Sen. Don Harmon</action>
<statusdate>2/8/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>First Reading</action>
<statusdate>2/8/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Referred to Rules</action>
<statusdate>2/21/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Assigned to Judiciary Civil Law</action>
<statusdate>3/1/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Do Pass Judiciary Civil Law;  010-000-000</action>
<statusdate>3/1/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 2, 2007</action>
<statusdate>3/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Donne E. Trotter</action>
<statusdate>3/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Second Reading</action>
<statusdate>3/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 6, 2007</action>
<statusdate>3/23/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Dan Cronin</action>
<statusdate>3/23/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules</action>
<statusdate>3/26/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Dan Cronin</action>
<statusdate>3/26/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules</action>
<statusdate>3/27/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to  Judiciary Civil Law</action>
<statusdate>3/27/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to  Judiciary Civil Law</action>
<statusdate>3/28/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommend Do Adopt Judiciary Civil Law;  007-000-000</action>
<statusdate>3/28/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommend Do Adopt Judiciary Civil Law;  007-000-000</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Recalled to Second Reading</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted; Cronin</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted; Cronin</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading</action>
<statusdate>3/29/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000</action>
<statusdate>3/30/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Arrived in House</action>
<statusdate>3/30/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading</action>
<statusdate>5/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Chief House Sponsor Rep. John A. Fritchey</action>
<statusdate>5/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>First Reading</action>
<statusdate>5/2/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Referred to Rules Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/7/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/16/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee;  014-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/16/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/22/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Second Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/22/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/23/2007</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/23/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Passed Both Houses</action>
<statusdate>6/21/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Sent to the Governor</action>
<statusdate>8/20/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Governor Approved</action>
<statusdate>8/20/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Effective Date January 1, 2008</action>
<statusdate>8/20/2007</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Public Act . . . . . . . . . 95-0315</action>
</actions>
</xml>

