TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.10 INTRODUCTION; DEFINITION OF TERMS; REFERENCED STATUTES
Section 1110.10 Introduction;
Definition of Terms; Referenced Statutes
a) Introduction
An application for permit shall
be made to the Health Facilities and Services Review Board (HFSRB) and
shall contain such information as HFSRB deems necessary [20 ILCS
3960/6(a)]. The applicant is responsible for addressing all pertinent review
criteria that relate to the scope of a construction or modification project or
to a project for the acquisition of major medical equipment. Applicable review
criteria may include, but are not limited to, general review criteria,
discontinuation, category of service criteria, and financial and economic
feasibility criteria. Applications for permits shall be processed, classified
and reviewed in accordance with all applicable HFSRB rules. HFSRB shall
consider a project's conformance with all applicable review criteria in
evaluating applications and in determining whether a permit should be issued.
b) Definition
of Terms
Definitions pertaining to this
Part are contained in the Act, 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130, and various
Sections of this Part. HFSRB's operational rules relating to the processing
and review of applications for permit are contained in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1130.
c) Referenced
Statutes
1) Illinois
Statutes
A) Alternative
Health Care Delivery Act [210 ILCS 3]
B) Ambulatory
Surgical Treatment Center Act [210 ILCS 5]
C) Birth
Center Licensing Act [210 ILCS 170]
D) Clinical Social Work and
Social Work Practice Act [225 ILCS 20]
E) Community
Benefits Act [210 ILCS 76]
F) Dietitian
Nutritionist Practice Act [225 ILCS 30]
G) Emergency
Medical Services (EMS) Systems Act [210 ILCS 50]
H) Hospital
Licensing Act [210 ILCS 85]
I) Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act [5 ILCS 100]
J) Illinois
Health Facilities Planning Act [20 ILCS 3960]
K) Nursing
Home Care Act [210 ILCS 45]
2) Federal
Statutes
A) Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254E)
B) Social
Security Act – Title XVIII (42 U.S.C. 1395)
C) Social
Security Act – Title XIX (42 U.S.C. 1396)
D) Social
Security Act Amendments of 1982 (PL 92-603) (42 U.S.C. 1329)
(Source: Amended at 48 Ill. Reg. 8945,
effective June 13, 2024)
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.20 CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTS
Section 1110.20 Classification of Projects
When an application for permit has been received by HFSRB,
the Administrator shall classify the project into one of the following
classifications:
a) Emergency Review Classification
1) An
emergency review classification applies only to those construction or
modification projects that affect the inpatient or outpatient operation of a
health care facility and are necessary because one or more of the following
conditions exist:
A) An
imminent threat to the structural integrity of the building;
B) An
imminent threat to the safe operation and functioning of the mechanical, electrical
or comparable systems of the building; or
C) Other hazardous
conditions that may harm or injure persons using the facility. [20 ILCS
3960/12(9)]
2) Applications
classified as emergency will be reviewed for conformance with the following
review criteria:
A) Documentation
has been provided that verifies the existence of at least one of the conditions
specified in subsection (a)(1);
B) Failure
to proceed immediately with the project would result in closure or impairment
of the inpatient operation of the facility; and
C) The
emergency conditions did not exist longer than 30 days prior to the receipt of
the application for permit.
3) Further
details concerning the process for emergency applications are provided in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1130.610.
b) Non-Substantive Review
Classification
Non-substantive projects are those
construction or modification projects that are not classified as substantive or
emergency. Applications classified as non-substantive will be reviewed for
conformance with the applicable review criteria in this Part.
c) Substantive Review
Classification
1) Substantive
projects shall include no more than the following:
A) Projects
to construct:
i) A
new or replacement facility located on a new site; or
ii) A
replacement facility located on the same site as the original facility and the
cost of the replacement facility exceeds the capital expenditure minimum, which
shall be reviewed by the Board within 120 days;
B) Projects
proposing:
i) Establishment
of a category of service within an existing health care facility; or
ii) Discontinuation
of a category of service within an existing healthcare facility or
discontinuation of a health care facility.
C) Projects
that involve more than 20 beds, or more than 10% of total bed capacity, as
defined by HFSRB, whichever is less, over a 2-year period, and
propose a change in the bed capacity of a health care facility by:
i) An
increase in the total number of beds;
ii) A
redistribution of beds among various categories of service; or
iii) A
relocation of beds from one physical facility or site to another. [20 ILCS
3960/12(8)]
2) Applications
classified as substantive will be reviewed for conformance with all applicable
review criteria contained in this Part.
d) Classification Appeal
Appeal of any classification may
be made to HFSRB at the next scheduled meeting following the date of the Administrator's
determination.
SUBPART B: INTRODUCTION; GENERAL INFORMATION; GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.100 INTRODUCTION
Section 1110.100 Introduction
a) This
Subpart contains the Information Requirements and Review Criteria that apply in
total or in part to all projects that require a permit, (with the exception of
projects solely involving discontinuation and long term care), including:
1) Purpose
of Project, Safety Net Impact Statement and Alternatives − Information
Requirements;
2) Project
Scope and Size, Utilization and Unfinished/Shell Space Review Criteria.
b) Each
required point of information is intended to provide HFSRB with an overview of
the need for a proposed project. HFSRB shall consider a project's conformance
with the applicable information requirements contained in this Subpart, as well
as a project's conformance with all applicable review criteria indicated in
subsection (c), to determine whether sufficient project need has been
documented to issue a Certificate of Need (CON) permit.
c) The
review criteria to be addressed (as required) are contained in the following
Parts and Subparts:
1) Section
1110.120 contains review criteria concerning Project Scope and Size,
Utilization and Unfinished Shell Space, and Section 1110.270 contains review
criteria concerning Clinical Service Areas Other Than Categories of Service;
2) Subpart
C contains service specific review criteria that shall be addressed, as
applicable, to the category of service included in a proposed project;
3) 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1120 contains review criteria pertaining to financial and
economic feasibility;
4) 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1130 contains the CON operational requirements that may be
applicable to a proposed project; and
5) An
application for a permit or exemption shall be made to HFSRB upon forms
provided by HFSRB. This application shall contain such information as HFSRB
deems necessary. [20 ILCS 3960/6]
d) Definitions
for Subparts B and C are contained in the Act, in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.220
and throughout this Part.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.110 BACKGROUND OF THE APPLICANT, PURPOSE OF PROJECT, SAFETY NET IMPACT STATEMENT, AND ALTERNATIVES - INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
Section 1110.110 Background of the Applicant, Purpose
of Project, Safety Net Impact Statement, and Alternatives − Information
Requirements
The information requirements contained in this Section are
applicable to all projects except projects that are solely for
discontinuation. An applicant shall document the qualifications,
background, character and financial resources to adequately provide a proper
service for the community and also demonstrate that the project promotes
the orderly and economic development of health care facilities in the State
of Illinois that avoids unnecessary duplication of facilities or service.
[20 ILCS 3960/2]
a) Background of Applicant
– Review Criteria
1) An
applicant must demonstrate that it is fit, willing and able, and has the
qualifications, background and character to adequately provide a proper
standard of health care service for the community. [20 ILCS 3960/6] In
evaluating the qualifications, background and character of the applicant, HFSRB
shall consider whether adverse action has been taken against the applicant,
including corporate officers or directors, LLC members, partners, and owners of
at least 5% of the proposed health care facility, or against any health care
facility owned or operated by the applicant, directly or indirectly, within 3
years preceding the filing of the application. A health care facility is
considered "owned or operated" by every person or entity that owns,
directly or indirectly, an ownership interest. If any person or entity owns
any option to acquire stock, the stock shall be considered to be owned by that
person or entity (see 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130 for definitions of terms
such as "adverse action", "ownership interest" and "principal
shareholder").
EXAMPLES:
Examples of facilities owned or
operated by an applicant include:
The applicant, Partnership ABC,
owns 60% of the shares of Corporation XYZ, which manages the Good Care Nursing
Home under a management agreement. The applicant, Partnership ABC, owns or
operates Good Care Nursing Home.
The applicant, Healthy Hospital, a
corporation, is a subsidiary of Universal Health, the parent corporation of
Healthcenter Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center (ASTC), its wholly-owned
subsidiary. The applicant, Healthy Hospital, owns and operates Healthcenter
ASTC.
Dr. Wellcare is the applicant.
His wife is the director of a corporation that owns a hospital. The applicant,
Dr. Wellcare, owns or operates the hospital.
Drs. Faith, Hope and Charity own
40%, 35% and 10%, respectively, of the shares of Healthfair, Inc., a
corporation, that is the applicant. Dr. Charity owns 45% and Drs. Well and
Care each own 25% of the shares of XYZ Nursing Home, Inc. The applicant,
Healthfair, Inc., owns and operates XYZ Nursing Home, Inc.
2) The applicant shall submit
the following information:
A) A
listing of all health care facilities currently owned and/or operated by the
applicant in Illinois or elsewhere, including licensing, certification and
accreditation identification numbers, as applicable;
B) A
listing of all health care facilities currently owned and/or operated in
Illinois, by any corporate officers or directors, LLC members, partners, or
owners of at least 5% of the proposed health care facility;
C) A
certified listing from the applicant of any adverse action taken against any
facility owned and/or operated by the applicant during the 3 years prior to the
filing of the application;
D) A
certified listing of each applicant, corporate officer or director, LLC member,
partner and owner of at least 5% of the proposed facility, identifying those
individuals that have been:
i) cited,
arrested, taken into custody, charged with, indicted, convicted or tried for,
or pled guilty to the commission of any felony or misdemeanor or violation of
the law, except for minor parking violations; or
ii) the
subject of any juvenile delinquency or youthful offender proceeding;
E) Unless
convictions have been expunged, all convictions shall be detailed in writing
and any police or court records regarding any matters disclosed shall be
submitted for HFSRB's consideration;
F) A
certified listing of each applicant, corporate officer or director, LLC member,
partner and owner of at least 5% of the proposed facility who has been charged
with fraudulent conduct or any act involving moral turpitude. Any such matter
shall be disclosed in detail;
G) A
certified listing of each applicant, corporate officer or director, LLC member,
partner and owner of at least 5% of the proposed facility who has any
unsatisfied judgments against him or her;
H) A
certified listing of each applicant, corporate officer or director, LLC member,
partner and owner of at least 5% of the proposed facility. Any matter shall be
discussed in detail;
I) A
certified listing of each applicant, corporate officer or director, LLC member,
partner and owner of at least 5% of the proposed facility who is in default in
the performance or discharge of any duty or obligation imposed by a judgment,
decree, order or directive of any court or governmental agency. Any matter
shall be discussed in detail;
J) Authorization
permitting HFSRB and IDPH access to any documents necessary to verify the
information submitted, including, but not limited to: official records of IDPH
or other State agencies; the licensing or certification records of other
states, when applicable; and the records of nationally recognized accreditation
organizations. Failure to provide the authorization shall constitute an
abandonment or withdrawal of the application without any further action by
HFSRB. Any fees paid will be forfeited.
3) If,
during a given calendar year, an applicant submits more than one application
for permit, the documentation provided with the prior applications may be
utilized to fulfill the requirements of this subsection (a). In these
instances, the applicant shall attest that the information has been previously
provided, cite the project number of the prior application, and certify that no
changes have occurred regarding the information that has been previously
provided. The applicant is able to submit amendments to previously submitted
information, as needed to update and/or clarify data.
4) The
documentation for the Background of the Applicant is required one time per
application, regardless of the number of categories of service involved in a
proposed project.
b) Purpose
of the Project – Information Requirements
The applicant shall document that
the project will provide health services that improve the health care or
well-being of the market area population to be served. The applicant shall
define the planning area or market area, or other, per the applicant's
definition.
1) The
applicant shall address the purpose of the project, i.e., identify the issues
or problems that the project is proposing to address or solve. Information to
be provided shall include, but is not limited to, identification of existing problems
or issues that need to be addressed, as applicable and appropriate for the
project. Examples of such information include:
A) The
area's demographics or characteristics (e.g., rapid area growth rate, increased
aging population, higher or lower fertility rates) that may affect the need for
services in the future;
B) The
population's morbidity or mortality rates;
C) The
incidence of various diseases in the area;
D) The
population's financial ability to access health care (e.g., financial hardship,
increased number of charity care patients, changes in the area population's
insurance or managed care status);
E) The
physical accessibility to necessary health care (e.g., new highways, other
changes in roadways, changes in bus/train routes or changes in housing
developments).
2) The
applicant shall cite the source of the information (e.g., local health
department Illinois Project for Local Assessment of Need (IPLAN) documents,
Public Health Futures, local mental health plans, or other health assessment
studies from governmental or academic and/or other independent sources).
3) The
applicant shall detail how the project will address or improve the previously
referenced issues, as well as the population's health status and well-being.
Further, the applicant shall provide goals with quantified and measurable
objectives with specific time frames that relate to achieving the stated goals.
4) For
projects involving modernization, the applicant shall describe the conditions
being upgraded. For facility projects, the applicant shall include statements
of age and condition and any regulatory citations. For equipment being replaced,
the applicant shall also include repair and maintenance records.
c) Safety Net Impact
Statement – Information Requirements
All health care facilities,
with the exception of skilled and intermediate long term care facilities
licensed under the Nursing Home Care Act, shall provide a safety net impact statement,
which shall be filed with an application for a substantive project (see
Section 1110.40). Safety net services are the services provided by
health care providers or organizations that deliver health care services to
persons with barriers to mainstream health care due to lack of insurance,
inability to pay, special needs, ethnic or cultural characteristics, or
geographic isolation. [20 ILCS 3960/5.4]
1) A
safety net impact statement shall describe, if reasonably known by the
applicant, all of the following information:
A) The
project's material impact, if any, on essential safety net services in the
community;
B) The
project's impact on the ability of another provider or health care system to
cross-subsidize safety net services; and
C) How
the discontinuation of a facility or service might impact the remaining safety
net providers in a given community.
2) A
safety net impact statement shall also include all of the following:
A) Certification
describing the amount of charity care provided by the applicant for the 3
fiscal years prior to submission of the application. The amount calculated
by hospital applicants shall be in accordance with the reporting requirements
in the Illinois Community Benefits Act. Non-hospital applicants shall report
charity care, at cost, in accordance with an appropriate methodology specified
by the Board. (See 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1120.20(c).)
B) Certification
describing the amount of care provided to Medicaid patients for the 3 fiscal
years prior to submission of the application. Hospital and non-hospital
applicants shall provide Medicaid information consistent with data reported in
IDPH's Inpatients and Outpatients Served by Payor Source and Inpatient and
Outpatient Revenue by Payor Source.
C) Any
information the applicant believes is directly relevant to safety net services,
including information regarding teaching, research, and any other service. [20
ILCS 3960/5.4(d)(3)]
3) Safety
Net Impact Statement Response
A) Any
person, community organization, provider or health system or other entity
wishing to comment upon or oppose the application may file a safety net impact statement
response with the Board, which shall provide additional information concerning
a project's impact on the safety net services in the community. [20 ILCS
3960/5.4(f)]
B) Applicants
shall be provided an opportunity to submit a reply to any safety net impact statement
response. [20 ILCS 3960/5.4(g)]
4) HFSRB State
Board Staff Report
The HFSRB State
Board Staff Report shall indicate:
A) Whether
a safety net impact statement was filed by the applicant;
B) Whether
the safety net impact statement included information on charity care, the
amount of care provided to Medicaid patients, and information on teaching
research, or any other service provided by the applicant that is directly
relevant to safety net services [20 ILCS 3960/5.4(h)]; and
C) Names
of the parties submitting responses and the number of responses and replies, if
any, that were filed [20 ILCS 3960/5.4(h)].
d) Alternatives to the
Proposed Project – Information Requirements
The applicant shall document that
the proposed project is the most effective or least costly alternative for
meeting the health care needs of the population to be served by the project.
1) Alternative
options shall be addressed. Examples of alternative options include:
A) Proposing
a project of greater or lesser scope and cost;
B) Pursuing
a joint venture or similar arrangement with one or more providers or entities
to meet all or a portion of the project's intended purposes; developing
alternative settings to meet all or a portion of the project's intended
purposes;
C) Utilizing
other health care resources that are available to serve all or a portion of the
population proposed to be served by the project; and
D) Other
considerations.
2) Documentation
shall consist of a comparison of the project to alternative options. The comparison
shall address issues of cost, patient access, quality and financial benefits in
both the short term (within one to 3 years after project completion) and long
term. This may vary by project or situation.
3) The
applicant shall provide empirical evidence, including quantified outcome data,
that verifies improved quality of care, as available.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.120 PROJECT SCOPE AND SIZE, UTILIZATION AND UNFINISHED/SHELL SPACE - REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 1110.120 Project Scope and Size, Utilization and
Unfinished/Shell Space − Review Criteria
a) Size of Project – Review
Criteria
1) The
applicant shall document that the physical space proposed for the project is
necessary and appropriate. The proposed square footage cannot deviate from the
square footage range indicated in Appendix B, or exceed the square footage
standard in Appendix B if the standard is a single number, unless square
footage can be justified by documenting, as described in subsection (a)(2).
2) If
the project square footage is outside the standards in Appendix B, the
applicant shall submit architectural floor plans (see HFSRB NOTE) of the
project identifying all clinical service areas and those clinical service areas
or components of those areas that do not conform to the standards. The
applicant shall submit documentation of one or more of the following:
A) The
proposed space is appropriate and neither excessive nor deficient in relation
to the scope of services provided, as justified by clinical or operational
needs; supported by published data or studies, as available; and certified by
the facility's Medical Director; or
B) The
existing facility's physical configuration has constraints that require an
architectural design that exceeds the standards of Appendix B, as documented by
architectural drawings delineating the constraints or impediments, in
accordance with this subsection (a); or
C) Additional
space is mandated by governmental or certification agency requirements that
were not in existence when the Appendix B standards were adopted; or
D) The
project involves the conversion of existing space that results in excess square
footage.
HFSRB NOTE: Architectural floor
plans submitted shall identify clinical service areas or components and shall
designate the areas in square footage. Architectural floor plans must be of
sufficient accuracy and format to allow measurement. Format may be either a
digital drawing format (.dwg file or equivalent) or a measurable paper copy
1/16 scale or larger.
b) Project Services
Utilization − Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that,
by the end of the second year of operation, the annual utilization of the
clinical service areas or equipment shall meet or exceed the utilization
standards specified in Appendix B. The number of years projected shall not
exceed the number of historical years documented. If the applicant does not
meet the utilization standards in Appendix B, or if service areas do not have
utilization standards in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, the applicant shall justify
its own utilization standard by providing published data or studies, as applicable
and available from a recognized source, that minimally include the following:
1) Clinical
encounter times for anticipated procedures in key rooms (for example, procedure
room, examination room, imaging room);
2) Preparation and
clean-up times, as appropriate;
3) Operational
availability (days/year and hours/day, for example 250 days/year and 8
hours/day); and
4) Other operational
factors.
c) Size of the Project and
Utilization:
For clinical service areas for
which norms are not listed in Appendix B (for example, central sterile supply,
laboratory, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy, respiratory
therapy, cardiac rehabilitation, speech pathology and audiology), the applicant
shall document that the proposed departmental gross square footage is necessary
and appropriate. The documentation shall consist of:
1) Basis
for the determination of the space (for example, key rooms, equipment,
personnel, utilization, etc.); and
2) Methodology applied.
d) Unfinished or Shell
Space − Review Criterion
If the project includes unfinished
space (i.e., shell space) that is to meet an anticipated future demand for
service, the applicant shall document that the amount of shell space proposed
for each department or clinical service area is justified, and that the space
will be consistent with the standards of Appendix B as stated in subsections
(a) and (b). The applicant shall provide the following information:
1) The
total gross square footage of the proposed shell space;
2) The
anticipated use of the shell space, specifying the proposed SF to be allocated
to each department, area or function;
3) Evidence
that the shell space is being constructed due to:
A) Requirements
of governmental or certification agencies; or
B) Experienced
increases in the historical occupancy or utilization of those departments,
areas or functions proposed to occupy the shell space. The applicant shall
provide the historical utilization for the department, area or function for the
latest 5-year period for which data are available, and, based upon the average
annual percentage increase for that period, project the future utilization of
the department, area or function through the anticipated date when the shell
space will be placed into operation.
e) Assurances
The applicant
shall submit the following:
1) The
applicant representative who signs the CON application shall submit a signed
and dated statement attesting to the applicant's understanding that, by the end
of the second year of operation after project completion, the applicant will
meet or exceed the utilization standards specified in Appendix B.
2) For
shell space, the applicant shall submit the following:
A) Verification
that the applicant will submit to HFSRB a CON application to develop and
utilize the shell space, regardless of the capital thresholds in effect at that
time or the categories of service involved;
B) The anticipated
date by which the subsequent CON application (to develop and utilize the
subject shell space) will be submitted; and
C) The estimated
date when the shell space will be completed and placed into operation.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.130 ADDITIONAL GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA FOR MASTER DESIGN AND RELATED PROJECTS ONLY
Section 1110.130 Additional
General Review Criteria for Master Design and Related Projects Only
a) System Impact of Master Plan. The applicant must document
that the proposed master plan or future construction or modification projects
will have a positive impact on the health care delivery system of the planning
area in terms of improved access, long term institutional viability, and
availability of services. Documentation shall address:
1) the availability of alternative health care facilities within
the planning area and the impact the applicant's proposed future projects will
have on the utilization of those facilities;
2) how the services proposed in the applicant's future projects
will improve access to area residents;
3) what the potential impact on area residents would be if the
proposed services were not to be replaced or developed; and
4) the anticipated role of the facility in the delivery system,
including anticipated patterns of patient referral and any contractual or
referral agreement between the applicant and other providers that will result
in the transfer of patients to the applicant's facility.
b) Master Plan or Related Future Projects – Review Criterion
The applicant
must document that all beds and services to be developed pursuant to the master
design project must be needed and that access to each service will be improved
as a result of the proposed master plan or the construction or modification
projects. The applicant must indicate anticipated completion dates for the
future construction or modification projects, and document:
1) that:
A) the proposed number of beds and services to be developed
pursuant to the master design project must be consistent with the bed or
service need determination of 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
B) if bed or service need determinations do not support the
proposed number of beds and services, there are existing factors that support
the need for that development at the time of project completion. These factors
include, but are not limited to:
i) limitations on governmental funded or charity patients that
are expected to continue;
ii) restrictive admission policies of existing planning area
health care facilities that are expected to continue;
iii) the planning area population is projected to exhibit
indicators of medical care problems, such as average family income below
poverty levels or projected high infant mortality; and
2) utilization of the proposed beds and services will meet or
exceed the utilization targets established in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 within 2
years after completion of the future construction or modification projects.
Documentation shall include:
A) historical service/bed utilization levels;
B) projected trends in utilization, including the rationale and
projection assumptions used in those projections;
C) anticipated market factors such as referral patterns or changes
in population characteristics (age, density, wellness) that would support
utilization projections; and
D) anticipated changes in the delivery of the service due to
changes in technology, care delivery techniques or physician availability that
would support the projected utilization levels.
c) Relationship to Previously Approved Master Design Projects – Review
Criterion
1) The applicant must document that any construction or
modification project submitted pursuant to an approved master design project is
consistent with the approved design permit. When the construction or
modification represents a single phase of a multiple phase master plan, the
applicant must document that the proposed phase is consistent with the approved
master plan, and that any elements that will be utilized to support additional
phases are justified under the approved master design permit. Documentation
shall consist of:
A) schematic architectural plans for all construction or
modification approved in the master design permit;
B) the estimated project cost for the proposed project and also
for the total construction/modification project approved in the master design
permit;
C) an item by item comparison of the construction elements (i.e.,
site, number of buildings, number of floors, etc.) in the proposed project to the
approved master design permit; and
D) a comparison of proposed beds and services to those approved
under the master design permit.
2) Approval of a proposed construction or modification project
that is but one phase in a multiple phase project does not obligate approval or
positive findings on construction or modification projects in future phases.
Future applications, including those involving the replacement or addition of
beds, are subject to the review criteria and bed need in effect at the time of
State Board review.
SUBPART C: CATEGORY OF SERVICE REVIEW CRITERIA
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.200 MEDICAL/SURGICAL, OBSTETRIC, PEDIATRIC AND INTENSIVE CARE
Section 1110.200
Medical/Surgical, Obstetric, Pediatric and Intensive Care
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving the following categories of hospital bed services:
Medical/Surgical; Obstetrics; Pediatrics; and Intensive Care. Applicants
proposing to establish, expand or modernize a category of hospital bed service
shall comply with the applicable subsections of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula
calculation)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of Category of Service
|
|
|
(b)(5)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing Services
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of
Existing Category of Service
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(d)(1) & (2) & (3)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service onsite,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (Category
of Service Modernization) plus subsection (g) (Assurances).
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of Services or Facility).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service (onsite
or new site), the number of beds being replaced shall not exceed the number
justified by historical occupancy rates for each of the latest 2 years, unless
additional beds can be justified per the criteria for Expansion of Existing
Services.
b) Planning Area Need −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the number of beds to be established or added is necessary to serve the
planning area's population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 (formula calculation)
A) The number
of beds to be established for each category of service is in conformance with
the projected bed deficit specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, as reflected in
the latest updates to the Inventory.
B) The
number of beds proposed shall not exceed the number of the projected deficit,
to meet the health care needs of the population served, in compliance with the
occupancy standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
A) Applicants
proposing to establish or add beds shall document that the primary purpose of
the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
area in which the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the
planning or geographical service area, as applicable), for each category of
service included in the project.
B) Applicants
proposing to add beds to an existing category of service shall provide patient
origin information for all admissions for the last 12-month period, verifying
that at least 50% of admissions were residents of the area. For all other
projects, applicants shall document that at least 50% of the projected patient
volume will be from residents of the area.
C) Applicants
proposing to expand an existing category of service shall submit patient origin
information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal residence (other than a
health care facility).
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of Bed Category of Service
The number of beds proposed to
establish a new category of service is necessary to accommodate the service
demand experienced annually by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year
period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals, or, if the
applicant proposes to establish a new hospital, the applicant shall submit
projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A) and
either subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C):
A) Historical Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for each proposed category of service, for each of the latest 2
years. Documentation of the referrals shall include: patient origin by zip
code; name and specialty of referring physician; name and location of the
recipient hospital.
B) Projected Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish a category of service or establish a new hospital shall submit the
following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address, and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Project
Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for
service is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's
existing market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month
period), the projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths,
and net migration for a period of time equal to, or in excess of, the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
4) Service
Demand – Expansion of Existing Category of Service
The number of beds to be added for
each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced high
occupancy and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant shall
document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either subsection (b)(4)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) An
average annual occupancy rate that has equaled or exceeded occupancy standards
for the category of service, as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, for each
of the latest 2 years;
ii) If
patients have been referred to other facilities in order to receive the subject
services, the applicant shall provide documentation of the referrals,
including: patient origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring
physician; and name and location of the recipient hospital, for each of the
latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Referrals
The applicant
shall provide the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's experienced caseload. The
percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed expansion cannot
exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share within a 24-month
period after project completion;
iii) Each
referral letter shall contain the physician's notarized signature, the typed or
printed name of the physician, the physician's office address and the physician's
specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth:
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
5) Service
Accessibility
The number of beds being
established or added for each category of service is necessary to improve
access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the
following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(5) only, all services within the established
radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization
standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Independent time-travel
studies;
iv) A certification of
waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist; and
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the
project site that provide the categories of bed service that are proposed by
the project.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, beds and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) A
ratio of beds to population that exceeds one and one-half times the State
average;
B) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the application)
for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy standard
established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
C) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) Category of Service
Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of a category of hospital bed service, the
applicant shall document that the inpatient bed areas to be modernized are
deteriorated or functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized,
due to such factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bedrooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMMS) inspection reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the occupancy standards for the categories of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing Availability −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document
that relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project
were considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing
requirements can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that
necessary staffing is available by providing a narrative explanation of how the
proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Performance
Requirements − Bed Capacity Minimum
1) Medical-Surgical
The minimum
bed capacity for a new medical-surgical category of service within a
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, is 100
beds.
2) Obstetrics
A) The
minimum unit size for a new obstetric unit within an MSA is 20 beds.
B) The
minimum unit size for a new obstetric unit outside an MSA is 4 beds.
3) Intensive
Care
The minimum
unit size for an intensive care unit is 4 beds.
4) Pediatrics
The minimum
size for a pediatric unit within an MSA is 4 beds.
g) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, by the second year of operation after
project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.205 COMPREHENSIVE PHYSICAL REHABILITATION BEDS
Section 1110.205
Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation Beds
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving the Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation
(CPR) category of service. Applicants proposing to establish, expand or
modernize CPR shall comply with the applicable subsections of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or
Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula
calculation)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of CPR
|
|
|
(b)(5)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)(1)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing Services
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of CPR
|
|
|
(e)(1)
|
−
|
Staffing − Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Comprehensive Physical
Rehabilitation Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
(d)(2) & (3)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Occupancy
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service on-site,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (Comprehensive
Physical Rehabilitation Modernization) plus subsection (g) (Assurances).
3) If the
proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of Services or Facility).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service (on-site
or new site), the number of beds being replaced shall not exceed the number
justified by historical occupancy rates for each of the latest 2 years, unless
additional beds can be justified per the criteria for Expansion of Existing
Services.
b) Planning Area Need −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the number of beds to be established or added is necessary to serve the
planning area's population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 (Formula Calculation)
A) The
number of beds to be established for each category of service is in conformance
with the projected bed deficit specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, as
reflected in the latest updates to the Inventory.
B) The
number of beds proposed shall not exceed the number of the projected deficit,
to meet the health care needs of the population served, in compliance with the
occupancy standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
A) Applicants
proposing to establish or add beds shall document that the primary purpose of
the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
area in which the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the
planning or geographical service area, as applicable), for each category of
service included in the project.
B) Applicants
proposing to add beds to an existing CPR service shall provide patient origin
information for all admissions for the last 12-month period, verifying that at
least 50% of admissions were residents of the area. For all other projects,
applicants shall document that at least 50% of the projected patient volume
will be from residents of the area.
C) Applicants
proposing to expand an existing CPR service shall submit patient origin
information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal residence (other than a
health care facility).
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation
The number of beds proposed to
establish CPR service is necessary to accommodate the service demand
experienced annually by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year
period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals, or, if the
applicant proposes to establish a new hospital, the applicant shall submit
projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A) and
either subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C).
A) Historical Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for each proposed category of hospital bed service, for each of
the latest 2 years. Documentation of the referrals shall include: patient
origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring physician; name and
location of the recipient hospital.
B) Projected Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish CPR or to establish a new hospital shall submit the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients whom the physician will refer annually to the
applicant's facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The
anticipated number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented
historical caseload;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for services
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to, or in excess of, the
projection horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
4) Service
Demand – Expansion of Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation
The number of beds to be added for
each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced high
occupancy and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant shall
document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either subsection (b)(4)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) An
average annual occupancy rate that has equaled or exceeded occupancy standards
for the category of service, as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, for each
of the latest 2 years.
ii) If
patients have been referred to other facilities in order to receive the subject
services, the applicant shall provide documentation of the referrals,
including: patient origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring
physician; and name and location of the recipient hospital, for each of the
latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Referrals
The applicant
shall provide the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's experienced caseload. The
percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed expansion cannot
exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share, within a 24-month
period after project completion;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
5) Service
Accessibility
The number of beds being
established or added for each category of service is necessary to improve
access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the
following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(5) only, all services within the established
radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization
standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Independent time-travel
studies;
iv) A certification of
waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist; and
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
c) Unnecessary Duplication/Maldistribution
− Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) from the
project site that provide the categories of bed service that are proposed by
the project.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, beds and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) A
ratio of beds to population that exceeds one and one-half times the State
average;
B) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
C) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the proposed
project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) Comprehensive Physical
Rehabilitation Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of a CPR service, the applicant shall
document that the inpatient bed areas to be modernized are deteriorated or
functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized, due to such
factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH
CMMS inspection reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the occupancy standards for the categories of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing
1) Availability
− Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project were
considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing requirements
can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that necessary staffing
is available by providing a narrative explanation of how the proposed staffing
will be achieved.
f) Performance Requirements
− Bed Capacity Minimums
1) The
minimum freestanding facility size for comprehensive physical rehabilitation is
a minimum facility capacity of 100 beds.
2) The
minimum hospital unit size for comprehensive physical rehabilitation is 16
beds.
g) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, by the second year of operation after
the project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.210 ACUTE MENTAL ILLNESS AND CHRONIC MENTAL ILLNESS
Section 1110.210 Acute
Mental Illness and Chronic Mental Illness
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving Acute Mental Illness (AMI) and Chronic
Mental Illness (CMI). Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize
AMI and CMI categories of service shall comply with the applicable subsections
of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula
calculation)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of AMI and/or CMI
|
|
|
(b)(5)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing Services
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of AMI
and/or CMI
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
(d)(2) & (3)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service onsite,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (AMI
and/or CMI Modernization) plus subsection (g) (Assurances).
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service offsite,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of Services or Facility).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service (onsite
or new site), the number of beds being replaced shall not exceed the number
justified by historical occupancy rates for each of the latest 2 years, unless
additional beds can be justified per the criteria for Expansion of Existing
Services.
b) Planning Area Need −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the number of beds to be established or added is necessary to serve the
planning area's population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 (Formula Calculation)
A) The
number of beds to be established for each category of service is in conformance
with the projected bed deficit specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, as
reflected in the latest updates to the Inventory.
B) The
number of beds proposed shall not exceed the number of the projected deficit,
to meet the health care needs of the population served, in compliance with the
occupancy standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
A) Applicants
proposing to establish or add beds shall document that the primary purpose of
the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
area in which the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the
planning or geographical service area, as applicable), for each category of
service included in the project.
B) Applicants
proposing to add beds to an existing AMI and/or CMI service shall provide
patient origin information for all admissions for the last 12-month period,
verifying that at least 50% of admissions were residents of the area. For all
other projects, applicants shall document that at least 50% of the projected
patient volume will be from residents of the area.
C) Applicants
proposing to expand an existing AMI and/or CMI service shall submit patient
origin information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal residence (other
than a health care facility).
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of AMI and/or CMI
The number of beds proposed to
establish a new AMI and/or CMI service is necessary to accommodate the service
demand experienced by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year
period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals, or, if the
applicant proposes to establish a new hospital, the applicant shall submit
projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A) and
subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C).
A) Historical
Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for each proposed category of hospital bed service, for each of the
latest 2 years. Documentation of the referrals shall include: patient origin
by zip code; name and specialty of referring physician; name and location of
the recipient hospital.
B) Projected
Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish a new AMI and/or CMI service or establish a new hospital shall submit
the following:
i) Physician
referral and/or DHS-funded mental health provider (59 Ill. Adm. Code 132) letters
that attest to the total number of patients (by zip code of residence) who have
received care at existing facilities located in the area during the 12-month
period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician and/or DHS-funded mental health
provider will refer annually to the applicant's facility within a 24-month
period after project completion. The anticipated number of referrals cannot
exceed the physician's and/or mental health provider's documented historical
caseload;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a
projected demand for service is based upon rapid population growth in the
applicant facility's existing market area (as experienced within the latest
24-month period), the projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract. Applicants proposing to use zip code
data to define the project market area shall indicate the sources of that
information;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projection
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to, or in excess of, the
projection horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
D) Patient
Type
The applicant shall identify the
type of patients that will be served by the project by providing the clinical
conditions anticipated (e.g., eating disorder, borderline personality disorder,
dementia) and age groups (e.g., childhood, adolescent, geriatric) targeted.
4) Service
Demand – Expansion of AMI and/or CMI Service
The number of beds to be added for
each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced high
occupancy and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant shall
document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either subsection (b)(4)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) An
average annual occupancy rate that has equaled or exceeded occupancy standards
for the category of service, as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, for each
of the latest 2 years.
ii) If
patients have been referred to other facilities in order to receive the subject
services, the applicant shall provide documentation of the referrals, including:
patient origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring physician; and
name and location of the recipient hospital, for each of the latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Referrals
The applicant
shall provide the following:
i) physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) an
estimated number of patients the physician will refer to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload. The percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed
expansion cannot exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share,
within a 24-month period after project completion;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced within the latest 24-month period), the projected
service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The applicant shall
define the facility's market area based
upon historical
patient origin data by zip code or census
tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
5) Service
Accessibility
The number of beds being
established or added for each category of service is necessary to improve
access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the
following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(5) only, all services within the established
radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization
standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient
location information by zip code;
iii) Distance
to other planning area providers, according to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d);
iv) A
certification of waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist;
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criteria
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) from the
project site that provide the categories of bed service that are proposed by
the project.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, bed and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) A
ratio of beds to population that exceeds one and one-half times the State
average;
B) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
C) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) AMI and/or CMI Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of an AMI and/or CMI service, the applicant
shall document that the inpatient bed areas to be modernized are deteriorated
or functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized, due to such
factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH CMMS inspection
reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the occupancy standards for the categories of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing Availability −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document
that relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project
were considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing
requirements can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that
necessary staffing is available by providing a narrative explanation of how the
proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Performance Requirements
− Bed Capacity Minimums
1) The
minimum unit size for a new AMI unit within an MSA is 20 beds.
2) The
minimum unit size for a new AMI unit outside an MSA is 10 beds.
g) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, by the second year of operation after
the project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.215 NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE
Section 1110.215 Neonatal
Intensive Care
This Section contains Review
Criteria that pertain to the Neonatal Intensive Care category of service.
a) Staffing
1) The applicant must document that the personnel possessing
proper credentials in the following categories are available to staff the
service:
A) Full-time Neonatal Director – a neonatologist.
B) Full-time Subspecialty Obstetrical Director – an obstetrician
certified by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the
subspecialty of Maternal and Fetal Medicine or a licensed osteopathic physician
with equivalent training and experience and certified by the American
Osteopathic Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
C) Other neonatologists and obstetricians sufficient in number to
serve the projected number of maternal and neonatal patients to be served by
the facility and to ensure adequate back-up to the neonatal and obstetrical
directors so that there will be continuity of patient care and consultation.
Backup neonatologists and obstetricians shall have credentials equivalent to
those of Neonatal and Obstetrical Directors.
D) Full-time Nurse-Director of the obstetric-newborn nursing
service who is experienced in perinatal nursing, with a master's degree.
E) Other nurses adequate in number to serve the projected number
of maternal and neonatal patients to be served by the facility.
F) Obstetric anesthesia services under the direct supervision of
a board-certified anesthesiologist with training in maternal, fetal and
neonatal anesthesia shall be available 24 hours a day. The directors of
obstetric anesthesia services shall ensure the backup supervision of their
services when they are unavailable.
G) One or more licensed social workers with perinatal/neonatal
experience.
H) Respiratory therapists with experience in neonatal care and
adequate in number to ensure availability of a minimum of one respiratory
therapist for every 4 patients on mechanical ventilators.
I) Registered dietician with experience in perinatal nutrition.
2) Documentation shall include a narrative explanation of how
positions will be filled.
b) Need for Additional Beds. The applicant must document that the
proposed neonatal intensive care beds are needed. Bed need may be documented by
any of the following:
1) no neonatal intensive care services exist within the planning
area;
2) that for each of the last 2 years for which data is available,
the yearly occupancy rate for the service at the affiliated perinatal center
has exceeded the target occupancy rate;
3) existing providers of the service within the planning area
cannot provide care to a patient caseload due to a limitation on funding for
care providing; or
4) that for each of the last 2 years for which data is available,
the yearly occupancy rate for the service at the applicant facility has
exceeded the target occupancy rate.
c) Obstetric Service. The applicant must document the
availability within the facility of an obstetric service capable of providing
care to high-risk mothers. Documentation must include a detailed assessment of
obstetric service capability. This requirement does not apply to a facility
dedicated to the care of children.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.220 OPEN HEART SURGERY
Section 1110.220 Open
Heart Surgery
a) Introduction
This Section contains
Review Criteria that pertain to the Open Heart Surgery category of service.
Open heart surgical procedures performed on an emergency basis due to a
complication occurring during a cardiac catheterization procedure shall not
constitute establishment of the open heart surgery category of service.
b) Review Criteria
1) Peer Review. The applicant shall document the mechanism for
peer review of an open heart surgery program.
2) Establishment of Open Heart Surgery. The applicant shall
document that a minimum of 200 open heart surgical procedures will be performed
during the second year of operation or that 750 cardiac catheterizations were
performed in the latest 12-month period for which data is available.
Anticipated open heart surgical volume shall be documented by historical
referral volume of at least 200 patients directly referred following
catheterization at the applicant facility to other institutions for open heart
surgery for each of the last 2 years.
3) Unnecessary Duplication of Services. The applicant shall document
that the volume of any existing service within the relevant travel radius from
the applicant will not be reduced below 350 procedures annually for adults and
75 procedures annually for pediatrics. Documentation shall consist of proof of
contact of all facilities within the travel radius currently providing open
heart surgery to determine the projected impact the project will have on
existing open heart surgery volume. For purposes of subsection (b)(3), the
following travel radii apply:
A) Category
1: For applicant facilities located in the counties of Cook, DuPage, Lake,
Will and Kane, the radius shall be 20 miles.
B) Category
2: For applicant facilities in McHenry, Kankakee, Rock Island, St. Clair,
Winnebago, Peoria, Sangamon and Champaign, the radius shall be 34 miles.
C) Category
3: For applicant facilities in all other counties, the radius shall be 42
miles.
4) Support Services. The applicant shall document that the
following support services and facilities are immediately available on a
24-hour basis and document how those services will be mobilized in the case of
emergencies.
A) Surgical and cardiological team appropriate for age group
served.
B) Cardiac surgical intensive care unit.
C) Emergency room with full-time director, staffed 24 hours for
cardiac emergencies with acute coronary suspect surveillance area and voice
communication linkage to the ambulance service and the coronary care unit.
D) Catheterization-angiographics laboratory services.
E) Nuclear medicine laboratory.
F) Cardiographics laboratory, electrocardiography, including
exercise stress testing, continuous electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring and
phonocardiography.
G) Echocardiography service. This may or may not be a part of the
cardiographics laboratory.
H) Hematology laboratory.
I) Microbiology laboratory.
J) Blood gas and electrolyte laboratory with microtechniques for
pediatric patients.
K) Electrocardiographic laboratory.
L) Blood bank and coagulation laboratory.
M) Pulmonary function unit.
N) Pacemaker installation.
O) Organized cardiopulmonary resuscitation team or capability.
P) Preventive maintenance program for all biomedical devices,
electrical installations, and environmental controls.
Q) Renal dialysis.
5) Staffing
A) The applicant shall document that a cardiac surgical team will
be established. The team shall be composed of at least the following:
i) Two cardiac surgeons (at a minimum, one of which shall be
certified and the other qualified by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery)
with special competence in cardiology, including cardiopulmonary anatomy,
physiology, pathology and pharmacology; extracorporeal perfusion technique; and
interpretation of catheterization angiographic data.
ii) Operating room nurse personnel (registered nurse (RN), licensed
practical nurse (LPN), surgical technician). The nurse to patient ratio for
the ICU module of open heart surgery patient care shall be no less than one
nurse per one patient in the immediate recovery phase and one nurse per 2
patients thereafter.
iii) Anesthesiologists (board certified by the American Board of
Anesthesiology).
iv) Adult cardiologists (board certified by the American Board of
Internal Medicine with subspecialty certification in cardiology).
v) Physician who is board certified in anatomic and clinical
pathology, with special expertise in microbiology, bloodbanking, lab aspects of
blood coagulation, blood gases and electrolytes.
vi) Pump technician, or operator of the extracorporeal pump
oxygenator, who shall have in-depth experience on the active cardiac surgical
service that includes perfusion physiology, mechanics of pump operation,
sterile technique, and use of monitoring equipment, whether he or she be a
physician, nurse or technician.
vii) Radiologic technologist experienced in angiographic principles
and catheterization procedure techniques who is experienced in the use, operation
and care of all catheterization equipment.
B) Documentation shall include a narrative explanation of how
positions will be filled.
(Source: Amended at 42 Ill. Reg. 24907, effective December 12, 2018)
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.225 CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
Section 1110.225 Cardiac
Catheterization
This Section contains Review
Criteria that pertain to the Cardiac Catheterization category of service.
a) Peer Review
Any applicant
proposing the establishment or modernization of a cardiac catheterization unit
shall detail in its application for permit the mechanism for adequate peer
review of the program. Peer review teams will evaluate the quality of studies
and related morbidity and mortality of patients and also the technical aspects
of providing the services such as film processing, equipment maintenance, etc.
b) Establishment or Expansion of Cardiac Catheterization Service
There shall be
not additional adult or pediatric catheterization categories of service started
in a health planning area unless:
1) the standards as outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.620 are
met; unless
2) in the circumstances where area programs have failed to meet
those targets, the applicant can document historical referral volume in each of
the prior 3 years for cardiac catheterization in excess of 400 annual
procedures (e.g., certification of the number of patients transferred to other
service providers in each of the last 3 years).
c) Unnecessary Duplication of Services
1) Any application proposing to establish cardiac catheterization
services must indicate if it will reduce the volume of existing facilities
below 200 catheterizations.
2) Any applicant proposing the establishment of cardiac
catheterization services must contact all facilities currently providing the
service within the planning area in which the applicant facility is located, to
determine the impact the project will have on the patient volume at existing
services.
d) Modernization of Existing Cardiac Catheterization Equipment
An applicant
with a proposed project for the modernization of existing equipment that
provides cardiac catheterization services shall document that the minimum
utilization standards (as outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.620) are met.
e) Support Services
1) Any applicant proposing the establishment of a dedicated
cardiac catheterization laboratory must document the availability of the
following support services;
A) Nuclear medicine laboratory.
B) Echocardiography service.
C) Electrocardiography laboratory and services, including stress
testing and continuous cardiogram monitoring.
D) Pulmonary Function unit.
E) Blood bank.
F) Hematology laboratory-coagulation laboratory.
G) Microbiology laboratory.
H) Blood Gas laboratory.
I) Clinical pathology laboratory with facilities for blood
chemistry.
2) These support services need not be in operation on a 24-hour
basis but must be available when needed.
f) Laboratory Location
Due to safety
considerations in the event of technical breakdown it is preferable to group
laboratory facilities. Thus in projects proposing to establish additional
catheterization laboratories such units must be located in close proximity to
existing laboratories unless such location is architecturally infeasible.
g) Staffing
It is the
policy of the State Board that if cardiac catheterization services are to be
offered that a cardiac catheterization laboratory team be established. Any
applicant proposing to establish such a laboratory must document that the
following personnel will be available:
1) Lab director board-certified in internal medicine, pediatrics
or radiology with subspecialty training in cardiology or cardiovascular
radiology.
2) A physician with training in cardiology and/or radiology
present during examination with extra physician backup personnel available.
3) Nurse specially trained in critical care of cardiac patients,
knowledge of cardiovascular medication, and understanding of catheterization
equipment.
4) Radiologic technologist highly skilled in conventional
radiographic techniques and angiographic principles, knowledgeable in every
aspect of catheterization instrumentation, and with thorough knowledge of the
anatomy and physiology of the cardiovascular system.
5) Cardiopulmonary technician for patient observation, handling
blood samples and performing blood gas evaluation calculations.
6) Monitoring and recording technician for monitoring physiologic
data and alerting physician to any changes.
7) Electronic radiologic repair technician to perform systematic
tests and routine maintenance; must be immediately available in the event of
equipment failure during a procedure.
8) Darkroom technician well trained in photographic processing
and in the operation of automatic processors used for both sheet and cine film.
h) Continuity of Care
Any applicant
proposing the establishment, expansion or modernization of a cardiac
catheterization service must document that written transfer agreements have
been established with facilities with open-heart surgery capabilities for the
transfer of seriously ill patients for continuity of care.
i) Multi-Institutional Variance
1) A variance to the establishment requirements of subsection
(b), Establishment or Expansion of Cardiac Catheterization Service shall be
granted if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed new program is
necessary to alleviate excessively high demands on an existing operating
program's capacity.
2) Each of the following must be documented:
A) That the proposed unit will be affiliated with the existing
operating program. This must be documented by written referral agreements
between the facilities, and documentation of shared medical staff;
B) That the existing operating program provides open heart
surgery;
C) That initiation of a new program at the proposed site is more
cost effective, based upon a comparison of charges, than expansion of the
existing operating program;
D) That the existing operating program currently operates at a
level of more than 750 procedures annually per laboratory; and
E) That the proposed unit will operate at the minimum utilization
target occupancy and that such unit will not reduce utilization in existing
programs below target occupancy (e.g., certification of the number of patients
transferred to other service providers in each of the last 3 years and market
studies developed by the applicant indicating the number of potential
catheterization patients in the area served by the applicant).
3) The existing operating program cannot utilize its volume of
patient procedures to justify a second affiliation agreement until such time as
the operating program is again operating at 750 procedures annually per
laboratory and the affiliate is operating at 400 procedures per laboratory.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.230 IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS PROJECTS
Section 1110.230 In-Center Hemodialysis Projects
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving the In-Center Hemodialysis category of
service. Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize this category
of service shall comply with the applicable subsections of this Section as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula
calculation)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of In-Center Hemodialysis
|
|
|
(b)(5)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Support Services
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Minimum Number of Stations
|
|
|
(h)
|
−
|
Continuity of Care
|
|
|
(i)
|
−
|
Relocation (if applicable)
|
|
|
(j)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing Services
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of
In-Center Hemodialysis
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing − Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Support Services
|
|
|
(j)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
In-Center Hemodialysis Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
(d)(2) & (3)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Support Services
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the relocation of an existing facility or
service, the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection
(a)(1) (Establishment of Services or Facility), as well as requirements in Section
1110.290 (Discontinuation) and subsection (i) of this Section (Relocation of
Facilities).
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service (onsite
or new site), the number of stations being replaced shall not exceed the number
justified by historical utilization rates for each of the latest 2 years,
unless additional stations can be justified per the criteria for Expansion of
Existing Services.
b) Planning Area Need −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the number of stations to be established or added is necessary to serve the
planning area's population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100
A) The
number of stations to be established for in-center hemodialysis is in
conformance with the projected station deficit specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100, as reflected in the latest updates to the Inventory.
B) The
number of stations proposed shall not exceed the number of the projected
deficit, to meet the health care needs of the population served, in compliance
with the utilization standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
A) Applicants
proposing to establish or add stations shall document that the primary purpose
of the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
area in which the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the
planning or geographical service area, as applicable), for each category of
service included in the project.
B) Applicants
proposing to add stations to an existing in-center hemodialysis service shall
provide patient origin information for all admissions for the last 12-month
period, verifying that at least 50% of admissions were residents of the area.
For all other projects, applicants shall document that at least 50% of the
projected patient volume will be from residents of the area.
C) Applicants
proposing to expand an existing in-center hemodialysis service shall submit
patient origin information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal
residence (other than a health care facility).
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of In-Center Hemodialysis Service
The number of stations proposed to
establish a new in-center hemodialysis service is necessary to accommodate the
service demand experienced annually by the existing applicant facility over the
latest 2-year period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals, or,
if the applicant proposes to establish a new facility, the applicant shall
submit projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A)
and either subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C).
A) Historical
Referrals
i) If
the applicant is an existing facility, the applicant shall document the number
of referrals to other facilities, for each proposed category of service, for
each of the latest 2 years.
ii) Documentation
of the referrals shall include: patient origin by zip code; name and specialty
of referring physician; name and location of the recipient facility.
B) Projected
Referrals
The applicant shall provide
physician referral letters that attest to:
i) The physician's
total number of patients (by facility and zip code of residence) who have
received care at existing facilities located in the area, as reported to The
Renal Network at the end of the year for the most recent 3 years and the end of
the most recent quarter;
ii) The
number of new patients (by facility and zip code of residence) located in the
area, as reported to The Renal Network, that the physician referred for
in-center hemodialysis for the most recent year;
iii) An
estimated number of patients (transfers from existing facilities and pre-ESRD,
as well as respective zip codes of residence) that the physician will refer
annually to the applicant's facility within a 24-month period after project
completion, based upon the physician's practice experience. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload;
iv) An
estimated number of existing patients who are not expected to continue
requiring in-center hemodialysis services due to a change in health status
(e.g., the patients received kidney transplants or expired);
v) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty;
vi) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services; and
vii) Each
referral letter shall contain a statement attesting that the information
submitted is true and correct, to the best of the physician's belief.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for
service is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's
existing market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month
period), the projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
4) Service
Demand – Expansion of In-Center Hemodialysis Service
The number of stations to be added
for each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced
high utilization and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant
shall document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either (b)(4)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) An
average annual utilization rate that has equaled or exceeded utilization
standards for in-center hemodialysis service, as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100, for each of the latest 2 years.
ii) If
patients have been referred to other facilities in order to receive the subject
service, the applicant shall provide documentation of the referrals,
including: patient origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring
physician; and name and location of the recipient facility, for each of the
latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Referrals
i) The
applicant shall provide physician letters that attest to:
• the physician's
total number of patients (by facility and zip code of residence) who have
received care at existing facilities located in the area, as reported to The
Renal Network at the end of the year for the most recent 3 years and the end of
the most recent quarter;
• the
number of new patients (by facility and zip code of residence) located in the
area, as reported to The Renal Network, that the physician referred for
in-center hemodialysis for the most recent year;
• an
estimated number of patients (transfers from existing facilities and pre-ESRD,
as well as respective zip codes of residence) that the physician will refer
annually to the applicant's facility within a 24-month period after project
completion, based upon the physician's practice experience. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload. The percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed
expansion cannot exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share,
within a 24-month period after project completion;
ii) Each
referral letter shall contain the physician's notarized signature, the typed or
printed name of the physician, the physician's office address and the
physician's specialty;
iii) The
physician shall verify that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services; and
iv) Each
referral letter shall contain a statement attesting that the information
submitted is true and correct, to the best of the physician's belief.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
5) Service
Accessibility
The number of stations being
established or added for the subject category of service is necessary to
improve access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the
following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For purposes
of this subsection (b)(5) only, all services within the established radii
outlined in subsection (b)(5)(C) meet or exceed the utilization standard
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the following
documentation concerning existing restrictions to service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Independent time-travel
studies;
iv) A certification of
waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist;
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
C) The travel radius for
purposes of subsection (b)(5)(A)(v) is:
i) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Cook and DuPage, the radius
shall be 5 miles.
ii) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Lake, Kane and Will, the radius
shall be 10 miles.
iii) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Kankakee, Grundy, Kendall,
DeKalb, McHenry, Winnebago, Champaign, Sangamon, Peoria, Tazewell, Rock Island,
Monroe, Madison and St. Clair, the radius shall be 15 miles.
iv) For
applicant facilities located in any other area of the State, the radius shall
be 19 miles.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within the
established radii outlined in subsection (c)(4) of the project's site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the established radii outlined in subsection (c)(4) of the project site
that provides the categories of station service that are proposed by the
project.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, stations and services characterized
by such factors as, but not limited to:
A) A
ratio of stations to population that exceeds one and one-half times the State
average;
B) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the utilization
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
C) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above utilization standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
4) The
travel radius for purposes of subsection (c)(1) is:
A) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Cook and DuPage, the radius
shall be 5 miles.
B) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Lake, Kane and Will, the radius
shall be 10 miles.
C) For
applicant facilities located in the counties of Kankakee, Grundy, Kendall,
DeKalb, McHenry, Winnebago, Champaign, Sangamon, Peoria, Tazewell, Rock Island,
Monroe, Madison and St. Clair, the radius shall be 15 miles.
D) For
applicant facilities located in any other area of the State, the radius shall
be 19 miles.
d) Category of Service
Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of an in-center hemodialysis service, the
applicant shall document that the areas to be modernized are deteriorated or
functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized, due to such
factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH CMMS inspection
reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
4) Projects
involving the relocation or modernization of in-center hemodialysis or a facility
shall meet or exceed the utilization standards for the categories of service,
as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing
The applicant shall document that
relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project were
considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing requirements
can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that necessary staffing
is available by providing letters of interest from prospective staff members,
completed applications for employment, or a narrative explanation of how the
proposed staffing will be achieved.
1) Qualifications
A) Medical
Director – Medical direction of the facility shall be vested in a physician who
has completed a board-approved training program in nephrology and has at least
12-months experience providing care to patients receiving dialysis.
B) Registered
Nurse – The nurse responsible for nursing services in the unit shall be a
registered nurse (RN) who meets the practice requirements of the State of
Illinois and has at least 12-months experience in providing nursing care to
patients on maintenance dialysis.
C) Dialysis
Technician – This individual shall meet all applicable State of Illinois
requirements (see the End Stage Renal Disease Facility Act). In addition, the
applicant shall document its requirements for training and continuing
education.
D) Dietitian
– This individual shall be a registered dietitian with the Commission on
Dietetic Registration, meet the practice requirements of the State of Illinois (see
the Dietitian Nutritionist Practice Act) and have a minimum of one year of
professional work experience in clinical nutrition as a registered dietitian.
E) Social
Worker – The individual responsible for social services shall have a Master's
of Social Work and meet the State of Illinois requirements (see the Clinical
Social Work and Social Work Practice Act).
2) Documentation
shall consist of:
A) Medical
Director
Curriculum vitae of Medical
Director, including a list of all in-center hemodialysis facilities where the
position of Medical Director is held.
B) All
Other Personnel
A narrative explanation of how
positions will be filled.
3) Training
The applicant proposing to
establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that an
ongoing program of training in dialysis techniques for nurses and technicians
will be provided at the facility.
4) Staffing
Plan
The applicant proposing to
establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that at
least one RN will be on duty when the unit is in operation and will maintain a
ratio of at least one direct patient care provider to every 4 patients.
5) Medical Staff
The applicant shall provide a
letter certifying whether the facility will or will not maintain an open
medical staff.
f) Support Services –
Review Criterion
An applicant proposing to establish
an in-center hemodialysis category of service must submit a certification from
an authorized representative that attests to each of the following:
1) Participation
in a dialysis data system;
2) Availability
of support services consisting of clinical laboratory service, blood bank,
nutrition, rehabilitation, psychiatric and social services; and
3) Provision
of training for self-care dialysis, self-care instruction, home and
home-assisted dialysis, and home training provided at the proposed facility, or
the existence of a signed, written agreement for provision of these services
with another facility.
g) Minimum Number of
Stations
The minimum number of in-center
hemodialysis stations for an End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facility is:
1) Four dialysis stations
for facilities outside an MSA;
2) Eight dialysis stations
for a facility within an MSA.
h) Continuity of Care
An applicant proposing to
establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that a
signed, written affiliation agreement or arrangement is in effect for the
provision of inpatient care and other hospital services. Documentation shall
consist of copies of all such agreements.
i) Relocation of
Facilities – Review Criterion
This criterion may only be used to
justify the relocation of a facility from one location in the planning area to
another in the same planning area and may not be used to justify any additional
stations. A request for relocation of a facility requires the discontinuation
of the current category of service at the existing site and the establishment
of a new category of service at the proposed location. The applicant shall
document the following:
1) That
the existing facility has met the utilization targets detailed in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100.630 for the latest 12-month period for which data is available; and
2) That
the proposed facility will improve access for care to the existing patient
population.
j) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that:
1) By
the second year of operation after the project completion, the applicant will
achieve and maintain the utilization standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100 for each category of service involved in the proposal; and
2) An
applicant proposing to expand or relocate in-center hemodialysis stations will
achieve and maintain compliance with the following adequacy of hemodialysis
outcome measures for the latest 12-month period for which data are available:
≥ 85% of
hemodialysis patient population achieves urea reduction ratio (URR) ≥ 65%
and ≥ 85% of hemodialysis patient population achieves Kt/V Daugirdas II
1.2.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.235 NON-HOSPITAL BASED AMBULATORY SURGICAL TREATMENT CENTER SERVICES
Section 1110.235
Non-Hospital Based Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center Services
a) Projects Not Subject to this Section
The specific
criteria of this Subpart will not apply to hospital projects that will provide
ambulatory surgical service and that will be operated in accordance with the
provisions of the Hospital Licensing Act.
b) Recognition
1) Due
to revisions in this Section, HFSRB shall recognize the existence of the
non-hospital based ASTC services for licensed facilities that are able to
verify the existence of these ASTC services prior to January 1, 2014. The
following documentation shall be submitted to HFSRB to substantiate the claim
that the ASTC services existed prior to that date:
A) verification
that identified outpatient surgical procedures were performed at the facility
prior to January 1, 2014; and
B) verification
that the facility obtained a license as an ASTC prior to January 1, 2014;
2) Documentation
shall be in the form of a letter from IDPH's licensure program confirming that
an ASTC license was obtained and a copy of the most recent HFSRB Ambulatory
Surgical Treatment Center Data Profile for the subject facility. Documentation
for an ASTC service that has not been performed during the most recent year
shall include:
A) a
letter from IDPH's licensure program confirming that an ASTC license was
obtained prior to January 1, 2014; and
B) either:
i) a
copy of the Annual Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center Data Profile showing
when the procedure in question was performed; or
ii) a
copy of the CON permit letter that identifies the services included in the
permit approval.
3) Recognition
by HFSRB of the non-hospital based ASTC services exempts the facility from the
requirement of obtaining a permit for establishment of a health care facility
and establishment of the identified and verified ASTC services. The exemption
shall be valid and remain in effect provided that the following requirements
are met:
A) the
procedures and scope of services provided at the facility remain restricted to
the ASTC services (e.g., podiatry, ophthalmology, plastic surgery) in operation
on or before January 1, 2014;
B) the
facility has obtained a license from IDPH on or before January 1, 2014; and
C) the
facility has petitioned HFSRB for recognition of the service no more than 90
days after April 15, 2014.
4) The
ASTC shall be subject to the provisions of 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.640 and subsections
(a) and (c) of this Section regarding subsequent transactions that require a
permit. Failure to comply with any of the requirements of this Part or
subsequent discontinuation of the facility shall:
A) void
the recognition of the verified ASTC services and their subsequent exemption;
B) subject
the facility to the sanctions and penalties provided by Section 14.1 of the Act
and 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1130.790; and
C) require
a permit or exemption to:
i) establish
an ASTC or ASTC service;
ii) change
ownership;
iii) expand
an existing ASTC;
iv) modernize
an existing ASTC when the estimated total project cost exceeds the capital
expenditure minimum. The current threshold is determined under 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1130.Appendix A and posted on HFSRB's website (www.hfsrb.illinois.gov); or
v) discontinue
an ASTC.
c) Review
Criteria
1) Introduction
A) Ambulatory
Surgical Treatment Centers required to be licensed pursuant to the Ambulatory
Surgical Treatment Center Act are defined as health care facilities subject to
the requirements of the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act and HFSRB rules
(77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, 1110, 1120 and 1130). Facilities devoted to abortion
and related care, including those licensed as PSTCs under the ASTC Act are not
subject to HFSRB rules related to Non-Hospital Based ASTCs. The addition of
any other ASTC services (other than abortion-related services) will require a
CON permit.
B) A
permit is required for:
i) the
establishment of a new non-hospital based ambulatory surgical treatment center
(ASTC);
ii) the
addition or establishment of a new ASTC service to an existing non-hospital
based ASTC;
iii) the
increase or expansion of the number of surgical/treatment rooms for an existing
ASTC service in a non-hospital based ASTC, if the total estimated project cost
exceeds the capital expenditures minimum. The current threshold is posted on
HFSRB's website (www.hfsrb.illinois.gov); or
iv) any
action with a total estimated project cost that exceeds the capital
expenditures minimum. The current threshold is determined under 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1130.Appendix A and posted on HFSRB's website (www.hfsrb.illinois.gov).
C) Applicants
proposing to establish an ASTC or add or expand an ASTC service in an existing
ASTC facility shall describe how the proposed project will address the
following indicators of need, as presented in the following table:
|
PROJECT
TYPE
|
REQUIRED REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of ASTC Facility
or Additional ASTC Service
|
(c)(2)(B)(i) & (ii)
|
−
|
Service to GSA Residents
|
|
(c)(3)(A) & (B) or (C)
|
−
|
Service Demand −
Establishment
|
|
(c)(5)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Treatment Room Need Assessment
|
|
(c)(6)
|
−
|
Service Accessibility
|
|
(c)(7)(A) through (C)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication/
Maldistribution
|
|
(c)(8)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Staffing
|
|
(c)(9)
|
−
|
Charge Commitment
|
|
(c)(10)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing ASTC
Service
|
(c)(2)(B)(i) & (ii)
|
−
|
Service to GSA Residents
|
|
(c)(4)(A) through (C)
|
−
|
Service Demand – Expansion
|
|
(c)(5)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Treatment Room Need Assessment
|
|
(c)(8)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Staffing
|
|
(c)(9)
|
−
|
Charge Commitment
|
|
(c)(10)(A) & (B)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
D) In
addition to addressing the applicable criteria listed in the chart in
subsection (c)(1)(C), the applicant shall indicate:
i) The
existing and the proposed ASTC services as specified in Appendix A;
ii) The
existing and the proposed number of surgical/treatment rooms for each ASTC
service as specified in Appendix A;
iii) If
an ASTC service is not specified in Appendix A, the applicant shall indicate
the existing and proposed ASTC services, the existing and proposed number of
surgical/treatment rooms, and the professional standards applicable to the
proposed ASTC services.
E) Transition
Period for Meeting this Section's Requirements
i) Multi-specialty
ASTCs that provided at least 3 of the ASTC services listed in Appendix A prior
to April 15, 2014, except those ASTCs described in subsection (c)(1)(E)(iii),
shall be exempt from this Section's CON application requirements for adding
additional ASTC services until January 1, 2018.
ii) Effective
April 15, 2014, multi-specialty ASTCs adding new services shall notify HFSRB of
what services are being added and the effective date of those services. The
notification of each new service added shall be submitted to HFSRB within 30
days after the service addition. Beginning January 1, 2018, multi-specialty
ASTCs seeking to add additional ASTC services shall apply for a CON permit
pursuant to the provisions of this Section.
iii) Multi-specialty
ASTCs that, as a condition of CON permit issuance, agreed to apply for CON
permits when adding services shall continue to apply for CON permits when
adding new services.
F) Sanctions
and Penalties
Noncompliance with the
requirements of subsection (b) and this subsection (c) shall be considered a
violation and shall be subject to the sanctions and penalties in the Act (see
20 ILCS 3960/14.1) and in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1130.790.
2) Geographic
Service Area Need
The applicant shall document that
the ASTC services and the number of surgical/treatment rooms to be established,
added or expanded are necessary to serve the planning area's population, based
on the following:
A) 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (Formula Calculation)
As stated in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100, no formula need determination for the number of ASTCs and the number of
surgical/treatment rooms in a geographic service area has been established.
Need shall be established pursuant to the applicable review criteria of this
Part.
B) Service
to Geographic Service Area Residents
The applicant shall document that
the primary purpose of the project will be to provide necessary health care to
the residents of the geographic service area (GSA) in which the proposed
project will be physically located.
i) The
applicant shall provide a list of zip code areas (in total or in part) that
comprise the GSA. The GSA is the area consisting of all zip code areas that
are located within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100.510(d) of the project's site.
ii) The
applicant shall provide patient origin information by zip code for all
admissions for the last 12-month period, verifying that at least 50% of
admissions were residents of the GSA. Patient origin information shall be
based upon the patient's legal residence (other than a health care facility)
for the last 6 months immediately prior to admission.
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of an ASTC Facility or Additional ASTC Service
The applicant shall document that
the proposed project is necessary to accommodate the service demand experienced
annually by the applicant, over the latest 2-year period, as evidenced by
historical and projected referrals. The applicant shall document the
information required by subsection (c)(3) and either subsection (c)(3)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Referrals
The applicant shall provide
physician referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of
treatments for each ASTC service that has been referred to existing
IDPH-licensed ASTCs or hospitals located in the GSA during the 12-month period
prior to submission of the application. The documentation of physician
referrals shall include the following information:
i) patient
origin by zip code of residence;
ii) name
and specialty of referring physician;
iii) name
and location of the recipient hospital or ASTC; and
iv) number
of referrals to other facilities for each proposed ASTC service for each of the
latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Service Demand
The applicant
shall provide the following documentation:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing IDPH-licensed ASTCs
or hospitals located in the GSA during the 12-month period prior to submission
of the application;
ii) Documentation
demonstrating that the projected patient volume, as evidenced by the physician
referral letters, is from within the GSA defined under subsection (c)(2)(B);
iii) An
estimated number of treatments the physician will refer annually to the applicant
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The
anticipated number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's experienced
caseload. The percentage of projected referrals used to justify the proposed
establishment cannot exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share
within a 24-month period after project completion;
iv) Referrals
to health care providers other than IDPH-licensed ASTCs or hospitals will not
be included in determining projected patient volume;
v) Each
physician referral letter shall contain the notarized signature, the typed or
printed name, the office address, and the specialty of the physician; and
vi) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to, or in excess of, the
projection horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups or the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each specialty in the application;
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted; and
viii) The
applicant shall estimate the future demand for the number of treatments or
procedures based upon population growth and no change in the facility's market
share.
4) Service
Demand − Expansion of Existing ASTC Service
The number of surgical/treatment
rooms to be added at an existing facility is necessary to reduce the facility's
experienced high utilization and to meet a projected demand for service. The
applicant shall document the information required by subsections (c)(4)(A)(i)
and (ii) and either subsections (c)(4)(B)(i) and (ii) or subsection (c)(4)(C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) The
applicant shall document an average utilization rate that has equaled or exceeded
the standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for existing
surgical/treatment rooms for each of the latest 2 years.
ii) If
patients have been referred to other IDPH-licensed facilities in order to
receive the subject services, the applicant shall provide documentation of the
referrals, including: patient origin by zip code of residence; name and
specialty of referring physician; and the name and location of the recipient
hospital or ASTC, for each of the latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Service Demand − Projected Referrals
i) The
applicant shall provide physician referral letters that attest to the
physician's total number of patients (by zip code of residence) that have
received treatments at existing IDPH-licensed facilities located in the GSA during
the 12-month period prior to submission of the application, and an estimate of
the number of patients that will be referred by the physician to the
applicant's facility.
ii) Each
physician referral letter shall contain the notarized signature, the typed or
printed name, the office address and the specialty of the physician. The
anticipated number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's experienced
caseload.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as described in subsection (c)(3)(C).
5) Treatment
Room Need Assessment – Review Criterion
A) The
applicant shall document that the proposed number of surgical/treatment rooms
for each ASTC service is necessary to service the projected patient volume.
The number of rooms shall be justified based upon an annual minimum utilization
of 1,500 hours of use per room, as established in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) For
each ASTC service, the applicant shall provide the number of patient
treatments/sessions, the average time (including setup and cleanup time) per patient
treatment/session, and the methodology used to establish the average time per
patient treatment/session (e.g., experienced historical caseload data, industry
norms or special studies).
6) Service
Accessibility
The proposed ASTC services being
established or added are necessary to improve access for residents of the GSA.
The applicant shall document that at least one of the following conditions
exists in the GSA:
A) There
are no other IDPH-licensed ASTCs within the identified GSA of the proposed project;
B) The
other IDPH-licensed ASTC and hospital surgical/treatment rooms used for those
ASTC services proposed by the project within the identified GSA are utilized at
or above the utilization level specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100;
C) The
ASTC services or specific types of procedures or operations that are components
of an ASTC service are not currently available in the GSA or that existing
underutilized services in the GSA have restrictive admission policies;
D) The
proposed project is a cooperative venture sponsored by 2 or more persons, at
least one of which operates an existing hospital. Documentation shall provide
evidence that:
i) The
existing hospital is currently providing outpatient services to the population
of the subject GSA;
ii) The
existing hospital has sufficient historical workload to justify the number of
surgical/treatment rooms at the existing hospital and at the proposed ASTC,
based upon the treatment room utilization standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100;
iii) The existing
hospital agrees not to increase its surgical/treatment room capacity until the
proposed project's surgical/treatment rooms are operating at or above the
utilization rate specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for a period of at least
12 consecutive months; and
iv) The
proposed charges for comparable procedures at the ASTC will be lower than those
of the existing hospital.
7) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
A) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information for the
proposed GSA zip code areas identified in subsection (c)(2)(B)(i):
i) the
total population of the GSA (based upon the most recent population numbers
available for the State of Illinois); and
ii) the
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the GSA that provide the ASTC services that are proposed by the project.
B) The applicant shall document that the project will not result
in maldistribution of services. Maldistribution exists when the GSA has an
excess supply of facilities and ASTC services characterized by such factors as,
but not limited to:
i) a
ratio of surgical/treatment rooms to population that exceeds one and one-half
times the State average;
ii) historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing surgical/treatment rooms for the ASTC services
proposed by the project that are below the utilization standard specified in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
iii) insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the
surgical/treatment rooms proposed by the project at or above utilization
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
C) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
i) will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the utilization
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
ii) will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other GSA facilities that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the
utilization standards.
8) Staffing
A) Staffing
Availability
The applicant shall document that
relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project were
considered and that the staffing requirements of licensure and The Joint
Commission or other nationally recognized accrediting bodies can be met. In
addition, the applicant shall document that necessary staffing is available by
providing letters of interest from prospective staff members, completed applications
for employment, or a narrative explanation of how the proposed staffing will be
achieved.
B) Medical
Director
It is recommended that the
procedures to be performed for each ASTC service are under the direction of a
physician who is board certified or board eligible by the appropriate
professional standards organization or entity that credentials or certifies the
health care worker for competency in that category of service.
9) Charge
Commitment
In order to meet the objectives of
the Act, which are to improve the financial ability of the public to obtain
necessary health services; and to establish an orderly and comprehensive health
care delivery system that will guarantee the availability of quality health
care to the general public; and cost containment and support for safety net
services must continue to be central tenets of the Certificate of Need process
[20 ILCS 3960/2], the applicant shall submit the following:
A) a
statement of all charges, except for any professional fee (physician charge);
and
B) a
commitment that these charges will not increase, at a minimum, for the first 2
years of operation unless a permit is first obtained pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1130.310(a).
10) Assurances
A) The
applicant shall attest that a peer review program exists or will be implemented
that evaluates whether patient outcomes are consistent with quality standards
established by professional organizations for the ASTC services, and if
outcomes do not meet or exceed those standards, that a quality improvement plan
will be initiated.
B) The
applicant shall document that, in the second year of operation after the
project completion date, the annual utilization of the surgical/treatment rooms
will meet or exceed the utilization standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100. Documentation shall include, but not be limited to, historical
utilization trends, population growth, expansion of professional staff or
programs (demonstrated by signed contracts with additional physicians) and the
provision of new procedures that would increase utilization.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.240 SELECTED ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Section 1110.240 Selected Organ Transplantation
a) Introduction
1) This subsection
(a) applies to projects involving the following category of service: Selected
Organ Transplantation. Applicants proposing to establish or modernize this
category of service shall comply with the applicable subsections of this
Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula
calculation)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of Category of Service
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Surgical Staff
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Collaborative Support
|
|
|
(h)
|
−
|
Support Services
|
|
|
(i)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(j)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
|
(d)(2) & 3
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Utilization
|
|
|
(i)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(j)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service on site,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (Category
of Service Modernization) plus subsection (j) (Assurances).
3) If
the proposed project involves the relocation of an existing facility or
service, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of Services or Facility), as well as requirements in Section 1110.290 (Discontinuation)
and Section 1110.230(i) (Relocation of Facilities).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service (onsite
or new site), the number of key rooms being replaced shall not exceed the
number justified by historical occupancy rates for each of the latest 2 years.
b) Planning
Area Need − Review Criteria
The applicant shall document that
the proposed category of service is necessary to serve the planning area's
population, based on the following:
1) 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (Formula Calculation)
No formula need for this
category of service has been established.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
Applicants proposing to establish
this category of service shall document that the primary purpose of the project
will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the area in which
the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the planning or
geographical service area, as applicable) for each category of service included
in the project.
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of Category of Service
The establishment of this category
of service is necessary to accommodate the service demand experienced annually
by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year period, as evidenced
by historical and projected referrals, or, if the applicant proposes to
establish a new hospital, the applicant shall submit projected referrals.
A) Historical
Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for this category of service, for each of the latest 2 years.
Documentation of the referrals shall include: patient origin by zip code; name
and specialty of referring physician; name and location of the recipient
hospital.
B) Projected
Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish this category of service shall submit the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's experienced caseload;
iii) The
physician's notarized signature, the typed or printed name of the physician,
the physician's office address and the physician's specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have
not been used to support another pending or approved CON application for the
subject services.
4) Service
Accessibility
The establishment
of this category of service is necessary to improve access for planning area
residents. The applicant shall document the following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive
admission policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(4) only, all services within the 3-hour normal
travel time meet or exceed the utilization standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable to cited restrictions, concerning
existing restrictions to service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient
location information by zip code;
iii) Independent
time-travel studies;
iv) A
certification of waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist;
vii) Most
recently published IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within 3 hours
normal travel time of the project's site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within 3 hours normal travel time from the project site that provide this
category of service.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, beds and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
B) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) Category of Service
Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of this category of service, the applicant
shall document that the inpatient areas to be modernized are deteriorated or
functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized, due to such
factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation shall
include the most recent:
A) IDPH
CMMS inspection reports; and
B) The
Joint Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies
of maintenance reports;
B) Copies of citations
for life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent
reports and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the utilization standards for the category of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing
Availability − Review Criterion
The applicant
shall document that relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the
proposed project were considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission
staffing requirements can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document
that necessary staffing is available by providing letters of interest from
prospective staff members, completed applications for employment, or a narrative
explanation of how the proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Surgical Staff – Review
Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the facility has at least one transplant surgeon certified in the applicable
specialty on staff and that each has had a minimum of one year of training and
experience in transplant surgery, post-operative care, long term management of
organ recipients and the immunosuppressive management of transplant patients. Documentation
shall consist of curricula vitae of transplant surgeons on staff and
certification by an authorized representative that the personnel with the
appropriate certification and experience are on the hospital staff.
g) Collaborative
Support – Review Criterion
The applicant shall document
collaboration with experts in the fields of hepatology, cardiology, pediatrics,
infectious disease, nephrology with dialysis capability, pulmonary medicine
with respiratory therapy support, pathology, immunology, anesthesiology,
physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Documentation of collaborate
involvement shall include, but not be limited to, a plan of operation detailing
the interaction of the transplant program and the stated specialty areas.
h) Support Services –
Review Criterion
An applicant shall submit a
certification from an authorized representative that attests to each of the
following:
1) Availability
of on-site access to microbiology, clinical chemistry, radiology, blood bank
and resources required to monitor use of immunosuppressive drugs;
2) Access
to tissue typing services; and
3) Ability
to provide psychiatric and social counseling for the transplant recipients and
for their families.
i) Performance
Requirements
1) The
applicant shall document that the proposed category of service will be provided
at a teaching institution.
2) The
applicant shall document that the proposed category of service will be
performed in conjunction with graduate medical education.
3) The
applicant shall provide proof of membership in the Organ Procurement and
Transplantation Network (OPTN) and a federally designated organ procurement
organization (OPO).
j) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, by the second year of operation after
the project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.245 KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
Section 1110.245 Kidney
Transplantation
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving the following category of service: Kidney
Transplantation. Applicants proposing to establish or modernize this category
of service shall comply with the applicable subsections
of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula calculation
)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of Category of Service
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Surgical Staff
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Support Services
|
|
|
(h)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(i)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
|
(d)(2) & (3)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
(h)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service onsite,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (Category
of Service Modernization) plus subsection (i) (Assurances).
3) If
the proposed project involves the relocation of an existing facility or
service, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of Services or Facility), as well as requirements in Section 1110.30 (Discontinuation)
and Section 1110.230(j) (Relocation of Facilities).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service (onsite
or new site), the number of beds shall be replaced on a 1:1 basis. If the
applicant proposes to add beds to the replacement service or facility, the
applicant shall also comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1)
for "Expansion of Existing Services".
b) Planning Area Need −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the proposed category of service is necessary to serve the planning area's
population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (Formula
Calculation)
No formula need
for this category of service has been established.
2) Service to Planning
Area Residents
Applicants proposing to establish
this category of service shall document that the primary purpose of the project
will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the area in which
the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the planning or geographical
service area, as applicable), for each category of service included in the
project.
3) Service Demand –
Establishment of Category of Service
The establishment of this category
of service is necessary to accommodate the service demand experienced annually
by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year period, as evidenced
by historical and projected referrals, or, if the applicant proposes to
establish a new hospital, the applicant shall submit projected referrals.
A) Historical
Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for this category of service, for each of the latest 2 years.
Documentation of the referrals shall include: patient origin by zip code; name
and specialty of referring physician; name and location of the recipient
hospital.
B) Projected
Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish this category of service shall submit the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in
the area during the 12-month period prior to submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload;
iii) Each
referral letter shall contain the physician's notarized signature, the typed or
printed name of the physician, the physician's office address and the physician's
specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have not been used to support
another pending or approved CON application for the subject services.
4) Service Accessibility
The establishment of this category
of service is necessary to improve access for planning area residents. The
applicant shall document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either subsection (b)(4)(B)
or (C):
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(4) only, all services within the 3-hour normal
travel time meet or exceed the utilization standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation concerning existing restrictions to service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Independent time-travel
studies;
iv) A certification of
waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist;
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within 3 hours
normal travel time of the project's site;
B) The total
population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within 3 hours normal travel time from the project site that provide this
category of service.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, beds and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy standard
established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
B) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy standards
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) Category of Service
Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of this category of service, the applicant
shall document that the areas to be modernized are deteriorated or functionally
obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized, due to such factors as, but not
limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care (e.g., private versus multiple bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH CMMS inspection
reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other
pertinent reports and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the occupancy standards for the categories of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing Availability −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project were
considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing requirements
can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that necessary staffing
is available by providing letters of interest from prospective staff members,
completed applications for employment, or a narrative explanation of how the
proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Surgical Staff – Review
Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the facility has at least one kidney transplant surgeon certified in the
applicable specialty on staff and that each has had a minimum of one year of
training and experience in transplant surgery, post-operative care, long-term
management of organ recipients and the immunosuppressive management of
transplant patients. Documentation shall consist of curricula vitae of
transplant surgeons on staff and certification by an authorized representative
that the personnel with the appropriate certification and experience are on the
hospital staff.
g) Support Services –
Review Criterion
The applicant must document that
the following are available on premises: laboratory services, social services,
dietetic services, self-care dialysis support services, inpatient dialysis
services, pharmacy and specialized blood facilities (including tissue typing). The
applicant must also document participation of the center in a recipient
registry. Documentation shall consist of a certification as to the
availability of such services and participation in a recipient registry.
h) Performance Requirements
The applicant
shall document that:
1) The
proposed category of service will be provided at a teaching institution;
2) The
proposed category of service will be performed in conjunction with graduate
medical education;
3) The
applicant renal transplantation center has membership in the Organ Procurement
and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and a federally designated organ procurement
organization (OPO); and
4) The
subject renal transplantation center is performing 25 or more transplants per
year.
i) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, by the second year of operation after
the project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.250 SUBACUTE CARE HOSPITAL MODEL
Section 1110.250 Subacute Care Hospital Model
a) Introduction
1) This
Section contains review criteria that pertain to the subacute care hospital
model category of service. Definitions pertaining to this Subpart are
contained in the Act, in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130, and in the
Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. The subacute care hospital model
category of service is a demonstration program that is authorized by the
Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. These subacute care hospital model review
criteria are utilized in addition to the applicable review criteria of this Subpart
C and 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1120. This Subpart also contains the methodology the
State Board will utilize in evaluating competing applications, if any, for the
establishment of any subacute care hospital models.
2) A
facility at any time may be caring for subacute patients. A permit must be
obtained to establish a subacute care hospital model. Existing hospitals and
long term care facilities providing subacute care are not required to obtain a
permit, provided, however, that the facilities shall not hold themselves out
to the public as subacute care hospitals (Section 15 of the Alternative
Health Care Delivery Act). Establishment of a subacute care hospital model
category of service occurs when a facility holds itself out to the general
public as a subacute care hospital. In these instances, failure to obtain a
permit will result in the application of sanctions as provided for in the
Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act.
3) As
the purpose of the demonstration project is to evaluate the subacute care
hospital model for quality factors, access and the impact on health care costs,
each applicant approved for the category of service will be required to
periodically submit data necessary for evaluating the model's effectiveness.
4) Applications
received for the subacute care hospital model shall be deemed complete upon
receipt by HFSRB. Due to the comparative nature of the subacute care hospital
model review, applicants will not be allowed to amend the application or
provide additional supporting documentation during the review process. The
application as submitted to HFSRB shall serve as the basis for all standard and
prioritization evaluation.
b) Review Criteria
1) Distinct
Unit
The applicant
must document that the proposed unit or health care facility will be primarily
self-contained and physically distinct and will have nursing staff dedicated to
service within only that unit. Auxiliary personnel and contracted professional
personnel must be available for care of unit patients but need not be dedicated
to providing service to only the subacute care hospital model. Documentation
shall include a physical layout of the unit detailing travel patterns to ancillary
and support services and to patient and visitor access and a detailed summary
of all shared services and how costs for those services will be allocated
between the model and the hospital or long term care facility. Also, the
applicant must provide a detailed staffing plan that includes staff
qualifications, staffing patterns for the proposed subacute care hospital and
the manner in which non-dedicated staff services will be provided.
2) Contractual Relationship
The applicant
must document the capability to handle cases of complications, emergencies or
exigent circumstances.
A) An applicant must document, for a model to be located in a
currently licensed long term care facility, the capability through the
existence of a contractual relationship (which includes a transfer agreement)
with a general acute care hospital.
B) An applicant must document, for a model to be located on a
designated site previously licensed as a hospital (see 77 Ill. Adm. Code 740(c)),
capability through the existence of a contractual arrangement (transfer
agreement) with a general acute care hospital.
C) An applicant must document, for a model to be located in a
licensed hospital, that the emergency capability continues to exist in
accordance with the requirements of hospital licensure.
3) Unit Size
The applicant
must document that the number of subacute care beds proposed will equal or
exceed the minimum number established for the planning area. The minimum
subacute care hospital unit size is 10 beds in rural planning areas (as defined
in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.720(a)) and 30 beds in all other planning areas.
c) HFSRB Evaluation. HFSRB shall evaluate each application for
the subacute care hospital model category of service based upon compliance with
the conditions set forth in subsections (c)(1), (2) and (3).
1) HFSRB Prioritization of Hospital Applications
A) All hospital applications for each planning area shall be rank
ordered based on points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart B –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) In rural areas an applicant shall be awarded 25 Points if
documentation is provided that the subacute care hospital model will provide
the necessary financial support for the facility to provide continued acute
care services. The documentation shall consist of:
• Factors within the facility or area that will prevent the
facility from complying with the minimum financial ratios established in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1120 within the next 2 years;
• Historical documentation that the facility has failed to
comply with the minimum financial ratios in each of the last 3 calendar years;
and
• Projected revenue from the subacute hospital care model and
the positive impact of that revenue on the financial position of the applicant
facility. The applicant must explain how the revenue will impact the
facility's financial position, causing the facility to comply with the
financial viability ratios of 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1120. Alternatively,
documentation can be provided showing that projected revenue from the subacute
hospital model will be sufficient to operate the subacute care hospital care
model in compliance with the financial viability ratios of 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1120, or that the applicant facility has entered into a binding agreement with
another institution that guarantees the financial viability of the subacute
hospital care model in accordance with the ratios established in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1120 for a period of at least 5 years, regardless of the financial ratios
of the applicant facility.
v) Location in a medically underserved area (as defined by the
Department of Health and Human Services (section 332 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 USC 254E)) as a health professional shortage area) – 3 Points.
vi) A multi-institutional system arrangement exists for the
referral of subacute patients under which the applicant facility serves as the
receiving facility for the system. A multi-institutional system consists of a
network of licensed hospitals and long term care facilities located within the
planning area and within 60 minutes travel time of the applicant that are
interrelated by contractual agreement that provides for an exclusive best
effort arrangement concerning the transfer of patients between facilities.
Best effort arrangement means that the referring facility will encourage and
recommend to its medical staff that patients requiring subacute care will be
transferred only to the applicant facility – 1 Point per each additional
facility in the multi-institutional system, to a maximum of 10 Points.
vii) The existence of Medicare and Medicaid certification at the
applicant facility and historic volume at the applicant facility. The
following point allocation will be applied:
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 10% and 25% of total facility patient days – 2
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 26% and 50% of total facility patient days – 4
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid patient
days exceeded 50% of total facility patient days – 6 Points.
viii) For each of the last 5 calendar years, the applicant facility
documents a case mix consisting of ventilator cases, head trauma cases,
rehabilitation patients including spinal cord injuries, amputees and patients
with orthopaedic problems requiring subacute care, or patients with multiple
complex diagnoses that included physiological monitoring on a continual basis,
of such magnitude that, if placed in the proposed subacute facility, these
patients would have constituted an annual occupancy exceeding 75%. If a
multi-institutional system, as defined in subsection (c)(1)(A)(vi), has an
exclusive best efforts agreement, then each of the cases listed in this
subsection (c)(1)(A)(viii) from such signatory facilities may be counted in
computing the 75% annual occupancy threshold – 5 Points.
ix) The applicant institution has documented that, during the last
calendar year, at least 25% of all patient days of the applicant facility were
reimbursed through contractual relationships with PPOs or HMOs – 3 Points.
x) If the applicant institution, over the last 5 calendar year
period, has been issued a notice of revocation of license from IDPH or has been
decertified from the federal Title XVIII or XIX programs – Loss of 25 Points.
xi) The applicant institution is accredited by The Joint
Commission – 3 Points and 1 additional Point if accreditation is "with
commendation".
xii) Staff support for the subacute care hospital model:
• Full time Medical Director exclusively for the model – 1
Point.
• Physical therapist, 2 full-time equivalents (FTEs) or more –
1 Point.
• Occupational therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
• Speech therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
xiii) In areas where competing applications have been filed, 3
Points will be allocated to the applicant with the lowest positive mean net
margin over the last 3 fiscal years. Each applicant must submit copies of the
audited financial reports of the applicant facility for the latest 3 fiscal
years.
B) Required Point Totals – Hospital Applications
A hospital
application for the development of a subacute care hospital model must obtain a
minimum of 50 Points for approval. The applicant within the planning area
receiving the most points shall be granted the permit for the category of
service if the minimum point total has been exceeded. In the case of tie
scores, HFSRB shall base its decision on considerations relating to location,
scope of service and access.
2) State
Board Prioritization – Long Term Care Facilities
A) All long term care applications for each planning area shall be
rank ordered based on points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart B –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) The applicant has had an Exceptional Care Contract with the
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services for at least 2 years in
the past 4 years – 3 Points.
v) Location in a medically underserved area (as defined by the
federal Department of Health and Human Services (section 332 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 USC 254E)) as a health professional shortage area) – 3
Points.
vi) The existence of Medicare and Medicaid certification at the
applicant facility and historic volume at the facility. The following point
allocation will be applied:
• In the last calendar year or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 10% and 25% of total facility patient days – 3
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 26% and 50% of total facility patient days – 6
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days exceeded 50% of total facility patient days – 9 Points.
vii) For each of the last 2 calendar years, the applicant
institution documents a casemix consisting of ventilator cases, head trauma
cases, rehabilitation patients including stroke cases, spinal cord injury,
amputees and patients with orthopaedic problems requiring subacute care, or
patients with multiple complex diagnoses that included physiological monitoring
on a continual basis, of such magnitude that, if placed in the proposed
subacute facility, these patients would have constituted an annual occupancy
exceeding 50%. If a multi-institutional system, as defined in subsection (c)(2)(A)(xiii),
has an exclusive best efforts agreement, then each of the cases listed in this
subsection (c)(2)(A)(vii) from the signatory facilities may be counted in
computing the 50% annual occupancy threshold – 5 Points.
viii) The applicant has documented that, during the last calendar
year, at least 20% of all patient days of the applicant facility were
reimbursed through contractual relationships with PPOs or HMOs – 3 Points.
ix) If the applicant, over the last 5 year period, has been issued
a notice of revocation of license from IDPH or decertified from the federal
Title XVIII or XIX programs – Loss of 25 Points.
x) Staff support for the subacute care hospital model:
• Full time Medical Director exclusively for the model – 1
Point.
• Physical therapist, 2 FTEs or more – 1 Point.
• Occupational therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
• Speech therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
xi) In areas where competing applications have been filed, 3
Points will be allocated to the application with the lowest positive mean net
margin over the last 3 fiscal years. Each applicant must submit copies of the
audited financial reports of the applicant facility for the latest 3 fiscal
years.
xii) The applicant institution is accredited by the Joint
Commission – 3 Points and 1 additional Point if accreditation is "with
commendation".
xiii) A multi-institutional system arrangement exists for the
referral of subacute patients under which the applicant facility serves as the
receiving facility for the system. A multi-institutional system consists of a
network of licensed hospitals and long term care facilities located within the
planning area and within 60 minutes travel time of the applicant that are interrelated
by contractual agreement that provides for an exclusive best effort arrangement
concerning the transfer of patients between facilities. Best effort
arrangement means the referring facility will encourage and recommend to its
medical staff that patients requiring subacute care will only be transferred to
the applicant facility – 1 Point per each additional facility in the
multi-institutional system to a maximum of 10 Points.
B) A long term care facility's application for the development of a
subacute care hospital model must obtain a minimum of 50 Points for approval.
The applicant within the planning area receiving the most points shall be
granted the permit for the category of service if the minimum point total has
been exceeded. In the case of tie scores, HFSRB shall base its selection on
considerations relating to location, scope of service and access.
3) HFSRB Prioritization of Previously Licensed Hospital
Applications in Chicago
A) All applications for sites previously licensed as hospitals in
Chicago shall be rank ordered based upon points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart C –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) Documentation that the proposed number of beds will be
utilized at an occupancy rate of 75% or more within 2 years after permit
approval. Documentation shall consist of historical subacute caseload from one
or more referral facilities whose subacute caseload, in the future, would be
transferred to the subacute model for care, anticipated caseload from physician
referrals to the unit, and demographic studies projecting the need for subacute
service within the primary market of the proposed subacute hospital care model
– 10 Points.
B) Required Point Totals – Previously Licensed Hospitals
The applicant
within the planning area receiving the most points shall be granted the permit
for the category of service. In the case of tie scores, HFSRB shall base its
selection on considerations relating to location, scope of service and access.
d) Project Completion
1) Since the purpose for establishment of this category of
service is to evaluate the alternative delivery model for effectiveness, these
projects are not complete until the model is evaluated and the decision made to
adopt or not adopt the model as an ongoing licensed level of service separate
from an alternative delivery model. A discontinuation permit will not be
required of a facility holding a subacute care hospital model permit if the
facility elects to discontinue the model but retain licensed subacute care
beds. The subacute care hospital model project shall be considered complete as
of the date IDPH is notified of the discontinuation. If, during the course of
the model evaluation period, an approved provider of the subacute hospital care
model elects to discontinue the category of service, a replacement provider of
the same type may be approved by the State Board. If a need for an additional
subacute care hospital model exists, applications shall be approved in
accordance with subsection (c). Any alteration to the subacute care hospital
model during the life of the permit is subject to State Board review.
2) All assurances and charges for service presented in the
application shall be in effect for the life of the permit unless altered with
the approval of the State Board.
3) A subacute care hospital model shall have 24 months from the
date of permit issuance to become operational. Failure to begin operation in
this time period shall result in the permit becoming null and void.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.255 POSTSURGICAL RECOVERY CARE CENTER ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE MODEL
Section 1110.255 Postsurgical Recovery Care
Center Alternative Health Care Model
a) Introduction
1) This Section
contains review criteria that pertain to the postsurgical recovery care center
alternative health care model category of service. Definitions pertaining to
this Section are contained in the Act, 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130, and the
Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. The postsurgical recovery care center
alternative health care model category of service is a demonstration program that
is authorized by the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. These postsurgical
recovery care center alternative health care model review criteria are utilized
in addition to the applicable review criteria of Subpart B and 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1120. This Section also contains the methodology HFSRB will utilize in
evaluating competing applications, if any, for the establishment of any
postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care models.
2) A
postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care model must obtain a CON
permit to establish the category of service prior to receiving a license for
the service. Failure to obtain a permit will result in the application of
sanctions as provided for in the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act.
3) As
the purpose of the demonstration project is to evaluate the model for quality
factors, access and the impact on health care cost, each applicant approved for
the category of service will be required to periodically submit data necessary
for evaluating the model's effectiveness. All data requests of this type shall
be a component of the semiannual progress reports required of all permit holders.
Data collected shall be provided to IDPH and the Illinois State Board of Health
for use in their evaluation of the model.
4) Applications
received for the postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care
model shall be deemed complete upon receipt by HFSRB. All postsurgical
recovery care center alternative health care models, for the purposes of
review, shall be considered the establishment of a category of service rather
than an addition of beds. Due to the comparative nature of the postsurgical
recovery care center alternative health care model review, applicants will not
be allowed to amend the application or provide additional supporting
documentation during the review process prior to the initial HFSRB decision.
The application, as submitted to HFSRB, shall serve as the basis for all
standard and prioritization evaluations.
b) Review Criteria
1) Needs/Unit Size
The applicant
must specify the number of beds to be in the proposed postsurgical recovery
care center. The applicant must also document that the proposed number of beds
is justified (utilizing the 80% occupancy target) based upon the anticipated
number of patients who will utilize the service. Documentation shall consist
of: patient identification numbers, ICD 10 Code or procedure type, patient
length of stay and surgical referral site for each inpatient surgical case that
occurred in surgical referral sites over the last 12 month period that could
have received surgical recovery services within the model if it had been
available.
2) Staffing
The applicant
must document that the postsurgical recovery care center will be a separate and
distinct (physically separate and identifiable) facility and have a dedicated
nursing staff (i.e., that staff members working a shift are assigned only to
cover the model), a medical director and 24 hours/day, 7 days/week on call
physician coverage by a physician licensed to practice medicine in all of it
branches. The on-call physician must be able to be physically present at the
model within 15 minutes upon request. Documentation shall consist of:
physical layout of the center (i.e., design drawings); identification of the
number and type of staff positions dedicated to the model; identification of
the facility medical director, including a signed commitment to the facility by
that person stating a willingness to hold that position; and evidence that the
required physician coverage will be accomplished.
3) Patient Mix
The applicant
must document that the postsurgical recovery care center is capable of
providing recovery care to patients receiving a wide variety of surgical
procedures. For the purposes of this subsection (b)(3), the following
specialties (listing not inclusive of all surgical procedures that can recover
in the model) shall be recognized: general surgery; eyes-ears-nose-throat;
orthopaedic; plastic surgery; ophthalmology; urology; obstetrics-gynecology;
and gastroenterology. The applicant must document that anticipated referrals
would result in admissions coming from at least 3 of these surgical specialties
and that each of the 3 specialty groups represents a minimum of 10% of facility
admissions totaling at least 30%. Documentation shall consist of a detailed
listing of the types of surgical procedures that will be performed for which
recovery care will be provided and the protocols as to how recovery care will
be given to each type of surgical patient, with details concerning how patient
safety will be assured.
4) Travel Time/Patient Transfer
The applicant
must document that the model will be located no farther than 30 minutes travel
time by medical transport from all surgical referral sites. Documentation
shall consist of identification of all surgical referral sites and the travel time/travel
distance to the recovery care center. The applicant must also document who
will have the responsibility for the transfer of patients from the surgical
site to the postsurgical recovery care center and provide all transfer
protocols, which must demonstrate the safe transfer of the surgical patients to
the postsurgical recovery care center from each surgical referral site.
5) On Site Emergency Care
The applicant
must document that the postsurgical recovery care center will have the
capability to provide on-site emergency services sufficient to stabilize a
patient for transfer to an acute care facility. Documentation shall consist of
all protocols established for the treatment of emergency patients and the
requirements established by the model for the education of staff in emergency
procedures. Each postsurgical recovery care center must document that a crash
cart is available on site and that staff trained in cardiac defibrillation are
available at all times.
c) HFSRB Evaluation
1) HFSRB shall evaluate each application for the postsurgical
recovery care center alternative health care model category of service (refer
to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.750(c) for development restrictions) based upon
compliance with the conditions set forth in subsection (c)(2).
2) HFSRB Prioritization
A) An application for the category of service must meet the
development restrictions specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.750(c).
B) All applications for each planning area shall be rank ordered
based on points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart B
– 10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) Location in a medically underserved area (as defined by the
federal Department of Health and Human Services (section 332 of the Public
Health Service Act) as a health professional shortage area) – 3 Points.
v) To ensure that the model evaluates a wide range of surgical
cases, an applicant shall be awarded an additional point for each designated
surgical specialty area beyond the required 3 areas from which patients are
referred to the postsurgical recovery care center.
vi) Historical Medicare and Medicaid surgical revenue at the
surgical referral sites: 10% to 25% – 3 Points, 26% to 50% – 6 Points and over
50% – 9 Points.
vii) Accreditation of the applicant facility or facilities by The
Joint Commission or the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Healthcare
(AAAHC) – 3 Points.
C) A postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care
model must obtain a minimum of 30 Points to be considered for approval.
Competing applications within a planning area that have obtained the points
necessary for permit consideration shall be evaluated by the HFSRB to determine
which application best implements the goals of the Health Facilities Planning
Act and the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act.
d) Project Completion
1) Since the purpose of establishment of this category of service
is to evaluate the alternative delivery model for effectiveness, these projects
are not complete until the model is evaluated and the decision made to adopt or
not adopt the model as an ongoing licensed level of service separate from an
alternative delivery model. A discontinuation permit will not be required of a
facility holding a postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care
model permit if the facility elects to discontinue the model. The postsurgical
recovery care center alternative health care model project shall be considered
complete as of the date the Agency receives notice of the discontinuation. If
a need for an additional model exists, applications shall be approved in accordance
with this Section. Any alteration, discontinuation or abandonment of the
approved category of service during the life of the permit is subject to State
Board review.
2) All assurances and charges for service presented in the
application shall be in effect for the life of the permit unless altered with
approval of the State Board. Charges may be annually adjusted for inflation,
not to exceed the growth in the health care component of the Consumer Price
Index.
3) A postsurgical recovery care center alternative health care
model shall have a period of 18 months from the date of permit issuance to
become operational. Failure to begin operation in this time period shall
result in the permit becoming null and void.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.260 COMMUNITY-BASED RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION CENTER ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE MODEL
Section 1110.260 Community-Based
Residential Rehabilitation Center Alternative Health Care Model
a) Introduction
1) This Section contains review criteria that pertain to the
community-based residential rehabilitation center category of service. Definitions
pertaining to this Section are contained in the Act, 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and
1130, and the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. The community-based
residential rehabilitation category of service is a demonstration program
authorized by the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act.
2) As the purpose of the demonstration project is to evaluate the
community-based residential rehabilitation model for quality factors, access,
and the impact on health care costs, the model approved for the category of
service will be required to periodically submit data necessary for evaluating
the model's effectiveness. Data collected shall be provided to IDPH and the
Illinois State Board of Health for use in their evaluation of the model.
b) Review Criteria
1) Staffing
The applicant
shall furnish a detailed staffing plan that provides: staff qualifications;
identification of the number and type of staff positions dedicated to the
model; how special staffing circumstances will be handled; staffing patterns
for the proposed community-based residential rehabilitation center; and the
manner in which non-dedicated staff services will be provided.
2) Mandated Services
The applicant
shall document that the community-based residential rehabilitation center has
the capability of providing the minimum range of services required under Section
35 of the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. Documentation shall consist of
a narrative of how services will be provided.
3) Unit Size
The applicant
shall document the number and location of all beds in the model. The applicant
shall also document that the number of community-based residential
rehabilitation beds shall not exceed 12 beds in any one residence, as defined
in Section 35 of the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. No community-based
residential rehabilitation center alternative health care delivery model shall
exceed 100 beds.
4) Utilization
The applicant
shall document that the target utilization for this model (as defined at 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100.770(c)) will be achieved by the second year of the model's
operation. Documentation shall include, but not be limited to, historical
utilization trends, population growth, expansion of professional staff or
programs, and new procedures that increase utilization.
5) Background of Applicant
The applicant
shall demonstrate experience in providing the services required by the model.
Additionally, the applicant shall document that the programs provided in the
model have been accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation
Facilities as a Brain Injury Community-Integrative Program for at least 3 of
the last 5 years.
c) In order for an application for the community-based
residential rehabilitation center alternative health care model to be approved,
the applicant must comply with all criteria established in subsection (b).
Competing applications within a planning area that comply with all criteria
shall be evaluated by the State Board to determine which application best
implements the goals of the Health Facilities Planning Act and the Alternative
Health Care Delivery Act.
d) Project Completion
1) Since the purpose for the establishment of this category of
service is to evaluate the alternative model for effectiveness, these projects
are not complete until such time as the model is evaluated and the decision
made to adopt or not adopt the model as an ongoing licensed level of service
separate from an alternative delivery model. A permit will not be required of a
community-based residential rehabilitation alternative health care model that
proposes to cease participation in the demonstration program. If the facility
proposes to discontinue the model, written notice containing the reasons for
the discontinuation must be received by the State Board at least 90 days prior
to the anticipated discontinuation. The project shall be considered abandoned
as of the date IDPH receives notice of the actual discontinuation or the date
the last client is discharged, whichever is later, and the facility should be
removed from the inventory.
2) After obtaining its initial certificate of need, a
community-based residential rehabilitation center alternative health care
delivery model must obtain an additional certificate of need from the State
Board before increasing the bed capacity of the center, as mandated by Section
35(b) of the Alternative Health Care Delivery Act.
3) All assurances for service presented in the application shall
be in effect until the demonstration program has been completed, unless altered
with approval of the State Board.
4) A community-based residential rehabilitation center
alternative health care model shall have a period of 12 months from the date of
permit issuance to become operational. Failure to begin operation in this time
period shall result in the permit becoming null and void.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.265 LONG TERM ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL BED PROJECTS
Section 1110.265 Long Term Acute Care Hospital
Bed Projects
a) Introduction
1) This
Section applies to projects involving Long Term Acute Care Hospital (LTACH)
services. Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize an LTACH
category of service shall comply with the applicable subsections of this
Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Services or Facility
|
(b)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula calculation
)
|
|
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(3)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment
of Category of Service
|
|
|
(b)(5)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Impact of Project on Other Area Providers
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Expansion of Existing Services
|
(b)(2)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents
|
|
|
(b)(4)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of
Category of Service
|
|
|
(e)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
|
|
(g)
|
−
|
Assurances
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
|
(d)(2) & (3)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Performance Requirements
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service on-site,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(1) (Category
of Service Modernization) plus subsection (g) (Assurances).
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(1) (Establishment
of ASTC Facility or Additional ASTC Service).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a hospital or service (onsite
or new site), the number of beds being replaced shall not exceed the number
justified by historical occupancy rates for each of the latest 2 years, unless
additional beds can be justified per the criteria for Expansion of Existing
Services.
5) If
the proposed project involves the conversion of existing acute care beds to
LTACH services, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection
(a)(1) (Establishment of ASTC Facility or Additional ASTC Service), as well as
requirements in subsection (b)(6) (Conversion of Existing General Acute Care
Beds).
b) Planning Area Need
− Review Criteria
The applicant shall document that
the number of LTACH beds to be established or added is necessary to serve the
planning area's population, based on the following:
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 (Formula Calculation)
A) The
number of LTACH beds to be established is in conformance with the projected bed
deficit specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, as reflected in the latest updates
to the Inventory.
B) The
number of LTACH beds proposed shall not exceed the number of the projected
deficit, to meet the health care needs of the population served, in compliance
with the occupancy standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
2) Service
to Planning Area Residents
A) Applicants
proposing to establish or add beds shall document that the primary purpose of
the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
area in which the proposed project will be physically located (i.e., the
planning or geographical service area, as applicable), for each category of
service included in the project.
B) Applicants
proposing to add beds to an existing LTACH service shall provide patient origin
information for all admissions for the last 12-month period, verifying that at
least 75% of admissions were residents of the area. For all other projects,
applicants shall document that at
least 75% of the projected patient volume will be from residents of the area.
C) Applicants
proposing to expand an existing LTACH service shall submit patient origin
information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal residence (other than a
health care facility).
3) Service
Demand – Establishment of LTACH Service
The number of beds proposed to
establish a new category of hospital bed service is necessary to accommodate
the service demand experienced annually by the existing applicant facility over
the latest 2-year period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals,
or, if the applicant proposes to establish a new hospital, the applicant shall
submit projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A)
and either subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C).
A) Historical
Referrals
If the applicant is an existing
facility, the applicant shall document the number of referrals to other
facilities, for each proposed category of hospital service, for each of the latest
2 years. Documentation of the referrals shall include patient origin by zip
code, name and specialty of referring physician, and name and location of the
recipient hospital.
B) Projected
Referrals
An applicant proposing to
establish a category of service or establish a new hospital shall submit the
following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the physician's total number of patients (by
zip code of residence) who have received care at existing LTACH facilities
located in the area or had a length of stay of over 25 days in a general acute
care hospital and were considered to be LTACH candidates, annually over the
latest 2-year period prior to submission of the application; and an estimate as
to the number of patients that will be referred to the applicant's facility;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload;
iii) Each
referral letter shall contain the physician's notarized signature, the typed or
printed name of the physician, the physician's office address and the physician's
specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have
not been used to support another pending or approved CON application for the
subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to, or in excess of, the
projection horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's market
area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
D) Type of
Patients
The applicant shall identify the
type of patients that will be served by the project by providing the
anticipated diagnosis (by DRG classification) for anticipated admissions to the
facility. The applicant shall also indicate the types of service (e.g., ventilator
care, etc.) to be provided by the project.
4) Service
Demand – Expansion of Bed Category of Service
The number of beds to be added for
each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced high
occupancy and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant shall
document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either subsection (b)(4)(B) or (C):
A) Historical
Service Demand
i) An
average annual occupancy rate that has equaled or exceeded occupancy standards
for the category of service, as specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, for each
of the latest 2 years.
ii) If
patients have been referred to other facilities in order to receive the subject
services, the applicant shall provide documentation of the referrals,
including: patient origin by zip code; name and specialty of referring
physician; and name and location of the recipient hospital, for each of the
latest 2 years.
B) Projected
Referrals
The applicant
shall provide the following:
i) Physician
referral letters that attest to the number of patients (by zip code of
residence) that have received care at existing LTACH facilities located in the
area or had a length of stay of over 25 days in a general acute care hospital
and were considered to be LTACH candidates, during the 12-month period prior to
submission of the application;
ii) An
estimated number of patients the physician will refer annually to the applicant's
facility within a 24-month period after project completion. The anticipated
number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical
caseload. The percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed
expansion cannot exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share,
within a 24-month period after project completion;
iii) Each referral letter
shall contain the physician's notarized
signature, the typed or printed
name of the physician, the physician's office address and the physician's
specialty; and
iv) Verification
by the physician that the patient referrals have
not been used to support another pending or approved CON application for the
subject services.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service
is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing
market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the
projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
i) The
applicant shall define the facility's market area based upon historical patient
origin data by zip code or census tract;
ii) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year, for county, incorporated place, township or
community area, by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
iii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iv) Historical
data used to calculate projections shall be for a number of years no less than
the number of years projected;
v) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
vi) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB, for each category of service in the
application; and
vii) Documentation
on projection methodology, data sources, assumptions and special adjustments
shall be submitted to HFSRB.
5) Service
Accessibility
The number of beds being
established or added for each category of service is necessary to improve
access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the
following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
i) The
absence of the proposed service within the planning area;
ii) Access
limitations due to payor status of patients, including, but not limited to,
individuals with health care coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, managed care
or charity care;
iii) Restrictive admission
policies of existing providers;
iv) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as an average family income level below the State average
poverty level, high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
v) For
purposes of this subsection (b)(5) only, all services within the established radii
outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization
standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other planning area service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Independent time-travel
studies;
iv) A certification of
waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in area providers;
vi) An
assessment of area population characteristics that document that access
problems exist;
vii) Most recently published
IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
6) Conversion
of Existing General Acute Care Beds – Review Criterion
An applicant proposing to
establish a Long Term Acute Care Hospital category of service through the
conversion of existing general acute care beds shall:
A) Address
Section 1110.30 for discontinuation of categories of service;
B) Identify
modifications in scope of services or elimination of clinical service areas,
not covered in Section 1110.290 (e.g., Emergency Department Classification,
Surgical Services, Outpatient Services, etc.);
C) Submit
a statement as to whether the following clinical service areas are to be
available to the general population (non-LTACH): operating rooms, surgical
procedure rooms, diagnostic services, therapy services (physical, occupational,
speech, respiratory) and other outpatient services; and
D) Document
that changes in clinical service areas will not have an adverse impact upon the
health care delivery system. An applicant shall document that a written
request for information on any adverse impact was received by all hospitals
within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d), and
that the request included a statement that a written response be provided to
the applicant no later than 15 days after receipt. Failure by an existing
facility to respond to the applicant's request for information within the
prescribed 15-day response period shall constitute a nonrebuttable assumption
that the existing facility will not be adversely impacted.
c) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criteria
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas that are located, in total or in part, within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located
within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the
project site that provide the categories of bed service that are proposed by
the project.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning
area) has an excess supply of facilities, beds and services characterized by
such factors as, but not limited to:
A) A
ratio of beds to population that exceeds one and one-half times the State
average;
B) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing facilities and services that is below the occupancy
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
C) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the services
proposed by the project at or above occupancy standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other area providers below the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other area hospitals that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the occupancy
standards.
d) LTACH Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of an LTACH category of service, the
applicant shall document that the inpatient bed areas to be modernized are
deteriorated or functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized due
to such factors as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Noncompliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes in standards of
care (e.g., private versus multiple
bed rooms); or
D) Additional space for
diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH CMMS inspection reports;
and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable
to the factors
cited in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
4) Projects
involving the replacement or modernization of a category of service or hospital
shall meet or exceed the occupancy standards for the categories of service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
e) Staffing Availability −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document
that relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project
were considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing
requirements can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that
necessary staffing is available by providing letters of interest from
prospective staff members, completed applications for employment, or a
narrative explanation of how the proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Performance Requirements
1) Bed Capacity Minimum
An applicant shall document that
the project will result in a facility capacity of at least 50 LTACH beds
located in an MSA and 25 LTACH beds in a non-MSA.
2) Length of Stay
A) An
applicant proposing to add beds to an existing service shall document that the
average length of stay (ALOS) for the subject service is consistent with the planning
area's 3-year ALOS.
B) Documentation shall
consist of the 3-year ALOS for all hospitals
within the planning area (as
reported in the Annual Hospital Questionnaire).
C) An
applicant whose existing services have an ALOS exceeding 125% of the ALOS for
area providers shall document that the severity or type of illness treated at
the applicant facility is significantly higher than the planning area average.
Documentation shall be provided from CMMS or other objective records.
D) An
applicant whose existing services have an ALOS lower than the planning area
ALOS shall submit an explanation as to the reasons for the divergence.
3) Be certified
by Medicare as a Long Term Acute Care Hospital within 12 months after the date
of project completion.
g) Assurances
The applicant representative who
signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting
to the applicant's understanding that, within 30 months of operation after the
project completion, the applicant will achieve and maintain the occupancy
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 for each category of service
involved in the proposal.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.270 CLINICAL SERVICE AREAS OTHER THAN CATEGORIES OF SERVICE
Section 1110.270 Clinical Service Areas Other Than
Categories of Service
a) Introduction
1) These
criteria are applicable only to those projects or components of projects
(including major medical equipment), concerning Clinical Service Areas (CSAs)
that are not Categories of Service, but for which utilization standards are
listed in Appendix B, including:
A) Surgery
B) Emergency Services
and/or Trauma
C) Ambulatory Care Services
(organized as a service)
D) Diagnostic and
Interventional Radiology/Imaging (by modality)
E) Therapeutic Radiology
F) Laboratory
G) Pharmacy
H) Occupational
Therapy/Physical Therapy
I) Major Medical Equipment
2) The
applicant shall also comply with requirements of the review criterion in
Section 1110.120(a) (Size of Project – Review Criteria), as well as all other
applicable requirements in this Part and 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130.
Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize CSAs shall comply with the
applicable subsections of this Section, as
follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED
REVIEW CRITERIA
|
|
New Services or Facility or Equipment
|
(b)
|
−
|
Need Determination − Establishment
|
|
Service Modernization
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
and/or
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Necessary Expansion
|
|
|
|
|
PLUS
|
|
|
(c)(3)(A)
|
−
|
Utilization − Major Medical Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
(c)(3)(B)
|
−
|
Utilization − Service or Facility
|
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service onsite,
the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (a)(2) (Service
Modernization).
4) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a facility or service on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(2) (New
Services or Facility or Equipment).
5) Projects
involving the replacement of a service or facility shall meet or exceed the
utilization standards for the service, as specified in Appendix B.
6) The
number of key rooms proposed in a replacement or modernization project shall be
justified by the historical utilization for each of the latest 2 years, per
utilization standards cited in Appendix B.
b) Need Determination −
Establishment
The applicant shall describe how
the need for the proposed establishment was determined by documenting the
following:
1) Service
to the Planning Area Residents
A) Either:
i) The
primary purpose of the proposed project is to provide care to the residents of
the planning area in which the proposed service will be physically located; or
ii) If
the applicant service area includes a primary and secondary service area that
expands beyond the planning area boundaries, the applicant shall document that
the primary purpose of the project is to provide care to residents of the
service area; and
B) Documentation
shall consist of strategic plans or market studies conducted, indicating the
historical and projected incidence of disease or health conditions, or use
rates of the population. The number of years projected shall not exceed the
number of historical years documented. Any projections and/or trend analyses
shall not exceed 10 years.
2) Service
Demand
To demonstrate need for the
proposed CSA services, the applicant shall document one or more of the
indicators presented in subsections (b)(2)(A) through (D). For any
projections, the number of years projected shall not exceed the number of
historical years documented. Any projections and/or trend analyses shall not
exceed 10 years.
A) Referrals from Inpatient
Base
For CSAs that will serve as a
support or adjunct service to existing inpatient services, the applicant shall
document a minimum 2-year historical and 2-year projected number of inpatients
requiring the subject CSA.
B) Physician Referrals
For CSAs that require physician
referrals to create and maintain a patient base volume, the applicant shall
document patient origin information for the referrals. The applicant shall
submit original signed and notarized referral letters, containing certification
by the physicians that the representations contained in the letters are true
and correct.
C) Historical Referrals to
Other Providers
If, during the latest 12-month
period, patients have been sent to other area providers for the proposed CSA
services, due to the absence of those services at the applicant facility, the
applicant shall submit verification of those referrals, specifying: the
service needed; patient origin by zip code; recipient facility; date of
referral; and physician certification that the representations contained in
the verifications are true and correct.
D) Population Incidence
The applicant shall submit
documentation of incidence of service based upon IDPH statistics or category of
service statistics.
3) Impact
of the Proposed Project on Other Area Providers
The applicant shall document that,
within 24 months after project completion, the proposed project will not:
A) Lower the utilization of
other area providers below the utilization
standards
specified in Appendix B.
B) Lower,
to a further extent, the utilization of other area providers that are currently
(during the latest 12-month period) operating below the utilization standards.
4) Utilization
Projects involving the
establishment of CSAs shall meet or exceed the utilization standards for the
services, as specified in Appendix B. If no utilization standards exist in
Appendix B, the applicant shall document its anticipated utilization in terms
of incidence of disease or conditions, or historical population use rates.
c) Service Modernization
The applicant shall document that
the proposed project meets one of the following:
1) Deteriorated
Equipment or Facilities
The proposed project will result
in the replacement of equipment or facilities that have deteriorated and need
replacement. Documentation shall consist of, but is not limited to: historical
utilization data, downtime or time spent out of service due to operational
failures, upkeep and annual maintenance costs, and licensure or fire code
deficiency citations involving the proposed project.
2) Necessary
Expansion
The proposed project is necessary
to provide expansion for diagnostic treatment, ancillary training or other
support services to meet the requirements of patient service demand.
Documentation shall consist of, but is not limited to: historical utilization
data, evidence of changes in industry standards, changes in the scope of
services offered, and licensure or fire code deficiency citations involving the
proposed project.
3) Utilization
A) Major Medical Equipment
Proposed projects for the
acquisition of major medical equipment shall document that the equipment will
achieve or exceed any applicable target utilization levels specified in
Appendix B within 12 months after acquisition.
B) Service or Facility
Projects involving the
modernization of a service or facility shall meet or exceed the utilization
standards for the service, as specified in Appendix B. The number of key rooms
being modernized shall not exceed the number justified by historical
utilization rates for each of the latest 2 years, unless additional key rooms
can be justified per subsection (c)(2) (Necessary Expansion).
C) If no
utilization standards exist, the applicant shall document in detail its
anticipated utilization in terms of incidence of disease or conditions, or
population use rates.
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.275 BIRTH CENTER ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE MODEL (REPEALED)
Section 1110.275 Birth Center – Alternative
Health Care Model (Repealed)
(Source: Repealed at 48 Ill. Reg. 8945,
effective June 13, 2024)
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.280 FREESTANDING EMERGENCY CENTER MEDICAL SERVICES
Section 1110.280 Freestanding Emergency Center Medical
Services
a) Introduction
No person shall construct,
modify or establish a freestanding emergency center in Illinois, or acquire
major medical equipment or make capital expenditures in relation to such a
facility in excess of the capital expenditure minimum, as defined by the
Act, without first obtaining a permit from the State Board in accordance with this
Section. [20 ILCS 3960/5.1a]
b) Review
Criteria
1) These
criteria are applicable only to those projects or components of projects
involving the freestanding emergency center (FEC) medical services (FECMS) category
of service. In addition, the applicant shall address other applicable
requirements in this Part, as well as those in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and
1130. Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize an FECMS category
of service shall comply with the applicable subsections of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT TYPE
|
REQUIRED REVIEW
CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Service
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Planning Area Need – 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 Formula Calculation
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Service to
Area Residents
|
|
|
(c)(3)
|
−
|
Service
Demand for Establishment
|
|
|
(c)(4)
|
−
|
Service Accessibility
|
|
|
(d)(1)
|
−
|
Unnecessary Duplication of Services
|
|
|
(d)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution
|
|
|
(d)(3)
|
−
|
Impact on Other Providers
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Request for Data from Other Providers
|
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
Expansion of Existing Service
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Service to Area Residents
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(e)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
(e)(2)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
(e)(3)
|
−
|
Additional Documentation
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of an FEC facility on site, the
applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (b)(1) for
Category of Service Modernization.
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of the FEC facility on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection (b)(1)
for Establishment of Service.
4) All
projects shall meet or exceed the utilization standards for the service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
5) All
projects for an FEC shall comply with the licensing requirements established in
Section 32.5 of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems Act, including the
requirements that the proposed FEC is located:
A) in
a municipality with a population of 50,000 or fewer inhabitants;
B) within
50 miles of the hospital that owns or controls the FEC; and
C) within
50 miles of the Resource Hospital affiliated with the FEC as part of the EMS
system. [210 ILCS 50/32.5(a)]
6) The
applicant shall certify that it has reviewed, understands and plans to comply
with all of the following requirements:
A) The
requirements of becoming a Medicare provider of freestanding emergency services;
and
B) The
requirements of becoming licensed under the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems
Act.
c) Area Need –
Establishment or Expansion of Service
1) 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100 Formula Calculation
No formula need calculation has
been established for the FECMS category of service.
2) Service
to Area Residents
Applicants proposing to establish
or expand an FECMS category of service shall document that the primary purpose
of the project will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the
geographic service area (GSA) (see 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d).
A) For
projects to establish an FECMS category of service, the applicant shall
document that at least 50% of the projected patient volume will be residents of
the GSA. Documentation shall consist of patient origin data, as follows:
i) Letters
from authorized representatives of hospitals or other FEC facilities that are
part of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System for the defined GSA,
including patient origin data by zip code. If letters are submitted as
documentation, a certification in each letter, by the authorized representative,
that the representations contained in the letter are true and correct. A
complete set of the letters with original notarized signatures shall accompany
the application for permit; or
ii) Patient
origin data by zip code from independent data sources (e.g., Illinois Health
and Hospital Association CompData or IDPH hospital discharge data), based upon
the patient's legal residence, for patients receiving services at the existing GSA
facilities' emergency departments (ED), verifying that at least 50% of the ED patients
served during the last 12-month period were residents of the GSA.
B) An
applicant proposing to expand an FECMS category of service shall provide
patient origin information for all patients served at the existing FEC facility
for the last 12-month period, verifying that at least 50% of patients served
were residents of the GSA. The applicant shall submit patient origin
information by zip code, based upon the patient's legal residence.
3) Service
Demand − Establishment of FECMS Category of Service
The applicant shall document that
establishment of an FECMS category of service is necessary to accommodate the
service demand experienced annually by the existing GSA hospitals over the
latest 2-year period.
A) Historical Utilization
The
applicant shall document the annual number of ED patients that have received
care at facilities that are located in the applicant's defined GSA for the
latest 2-year period prior to submission of the application.
B) Projected
Utilization
The applicant shall document:
i) the
estimated number of patients anticipated to receive services at the proposed
FEC. The anticipated number cannot exceed the documented historical caseload
of all hospitals that are located in the applicant's defined GSA.
ii) if
applicable, the estimated number of patients anticipated to receive services at
the proposed FEC, based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's
existing market area.
C) Projected
Service Demand – Documentation Parameters
i) Population
projections shall be produced, using, as a base, the population census or
estimate for the most recent year for zip code, county, incorporated place,
township, or community area by the U.S. Census Bureau or IDPH;
ii) Projections
shall be for a maximum period of 10 years from the date the application is
submitted;
iii) The
number of years projected shall not exceed the number of historical years
documented;
iv) Projections
shall contain documentation of population changes in terms of births, deaths,
and net migration for a period of time equal to or in excess of the projection
horizon;
v) Projections
shall be for total population and specified age groups for the applicant's
market area, as defined by HFSRB for each category of service in the
application; and
vi) Documentation
shall be submitted to HFSRB on projections methodology, data sources,
assumptions and special adjustments.
4) Service
Accessibility
The proposed project to establish
or expand an FECMS category of service is necessary to improve access for GSA
residents. The applicant shall document the following:
A) Service
Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the GSA:
i) The
absence of ED services within the GSA;
ii) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care
problems, such as high infant mortality, or designation by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services as a Health Professional Shortage Area, a Medically
Underserved Area, or a Medically Underserved Population;
iii) All
existing emergency services within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization standard specified in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100.
B) Supporting
Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other GSA service providers;
ii) Patient
location information by zip code;
iii) Travel-time
studies;
iv) A
certification of waiting times;
v) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist in GSA providers;
vi) An
assessment of GSA population characteristics that documents that access
problems exist; and
vii) The
most recently published IDPH Hospital Questionnaire.
d) Unnecessary
Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas (in total or in part) that are located within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population numbers available for the State of Illinois population); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved health care facilities located within
the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) from the
project site that provide emergency medical services.
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the identified facilities within the relevant
travel radius, as established by 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d), have an excess
supply of ED treatment stations characterized by such factors as, but not
limited to:
A) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing ED within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the applicant's site that is below the utilization
standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; or
B) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the ED
services proposed by the project at or above utilization standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project:
A) Will
not lower the utilization of other GSA providers below the utilization
standards specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100; and
B) Will
not lower, to a further extent, the utilization of other GSA hospitals or FECs
that are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the
utilization standards.
4) The
applicant shall document that a written request was received by all existing
facilities that provide ED service located within the established radii outlined
in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project site asking the number of
treatment stations at each facility, historical ED utilization, and the
anticipated impact of the proposed project upon the facility's ED utilization.
The request shall include a statement that a written response be provided to
the applicant no later than 15 days after receipt. Failure by an existing
facility to respond to the applicant's request for information within the
prescribed 15-day response period shall constitute an assumption that the
existing facility will not experience an adverse impact on utilization from the
project. Copies of any correspondence received from the facilities shall be
included in the application.
e) Category of Service
Modernization
1) If the
project involves modernization of an existing FECMS category of service, the
applicant shall document that the existing treatment areas to be modernized are
deteriorated or functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or modernized,
due to such factors as, but not limited to:
A) High
cost of maintenance;
B) Non-compliance
with licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes
in standards of care; or
D) Need
for additional space for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation
shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH
Inspection reports; and
B) The Joint
Commission reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable
to the factors
cited in the application:
A) Copies
of maintenance reports;
B) Copies
of citations for life safety code violations; and
C) Other
pertinent reports and data.
f) Staffing
Availability − Review Criterion
1) An
applicant proposing to establish an FECMS category of service shall document
that a sufficient supply of personnel will be available to staff the service.
Sufficient staff availability shall be based upon evidence that for the latest
12-month period prior to submission of the application, those hospitals or FECs
located in zip code areas that are (in total or in part) within one hour normal
travel time of the applicant facility's site have not experienced a staffing
shortage with respect to the categories of services proposed by the project.
2) A
staffing shortage is indicated by an average annual vacancy rate of more than
10% for budgeted full-time equivalent staff positions for health care workers
who are subject to licensing by the Department of Financial and Professional
Regulation.
3) An
applicant shall document that a written request for such information was
received by all existing facilities within the zip code areas, and that the
request included a statement that a written response be provided to the
applicant no later than 15 days after receipt. Failure by an existing facility
to respond to the applicant's request for information within the prescribed
15-day response period shall constitute an assumption that the existing
facility has not experienced staffing vacancy rates in excess of 10%. Copies
of any correspondence received from the facilities shall be included in the
application.
4) If
more than 25% of the facilities contacted indicated an experienced staffing
vacancy rate of more than 10% percent, the applicant shall provide
documentation as to how sufficient staff shall be obtained to operate the
proposed project, in accordance with licensing requirements.
(Source:
Amended at 42 Ill. Reg. 24907, effective December 12, 2018)
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.285 BIRTH CENTER SERVICES
Section 1110.285 Birth Center Services
a) Introduction
1) A
birth center shall obtain a certificate of need from the Health Facilities and
Services Review Board under the Health Facilities Planning Act before receiving
a license by the Department. [210 ILCS 170/17(a)]
2) All
birth centers in existence as of September 1, 2023, shall obtain a valid
license to operate by September 1, 2025. ([210 ILCS 170/10] and 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 264.1250(a)).
3) If,
after obtaining an initial certificate of need under subsection (a)(1), a
birth center seeks to increase the bed capacity of the birth center, the birth
center must obtain a certificate of need from the Health Facilities and
Services Review Board before increasing bed capacity. [210 ILCS 170/17(b)]
4) A
birth center that is located in a medically underserved area, as determined by
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, shall receive priority in
obtaining a certificate of need. [210 ILCS 170/17(c)]
b) Review Criteria
1) These
criteria are applicable only to those projects or components of projects
involving the birth center category of service. In addition, the applicant
shall address other applicable requirements in this Part, as well as those in
77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100, 1120 and 1130. Applicants proposing to establish,
expand or modernize a birth center category of service shall comply with the
applicable subsections of this Section, as follows:
|
PROJECT
TYPE
|
REQUIRED REVIEW
CRITERIA
|
|
Establishment of Service
|
(c)(1)
|
−
|
Formula Calculation
|
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Service to
Area Residents
|
|
(c)(3)
(d)(1)
|
−
−
|
Service Accessibility
Unnecessary Duplication
|
|
(d)(2)
|
−
|
Maldistribution of Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)(3)
|
−
|
Impact on Other Providers
|
|
(d)(4)
|
−
|
Request for Data from Other Providers
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
Expansion of Existing Service
|
(c)(2)
|
−
|
Service to Area Residents
|
|
(f)
|
−
|
Staffing Availability
|
|
Category of Service Modernization
|
(e)(1)
|
−
|
Deteriorated Facilities
|
|
(e)(2)
|
−
|
Documentation
|
|
(e)(3)
|
−
|
Additional Documentation
|
2) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of a birth center on the same
site as the existing birth center, the applicant shall comply with the
requirements listed in subsection (b)(1) for Category of Service Modernization.
3) If
the proposed project involves the replacement of the birth center on a new
site, the applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in subsection
(b)(1) for Establishment of Service.
4) All
projects shall meet or exceed the utilization standards for the service, as
specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.820(c).
5) All
projects for a birth center shall comply with the licensing requirements of the
Illinois Department of Public Health, which are set forth in the Birth Center
Licensing Act [210 ILCS 170] and the Birth Center Licensing Code (77 Ill. Adm.
Code 264).
6) The
applicant shall certify that it has reviewed and understands the requirements
to become certified under Titles XVIII and IX of the federal Social Security
Act and plans to seek certification under this Act.
c) Area Need –
Establishment or Expansion of Service
1) 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100
Formula Calculation
No formula need calculation has
been established for the birth center category of service.
2) Service to Area Residents
Applicants proposing to establish
or expand a birth center shall document that the primary purpose of the project
will be to provide necessary health care to the residents of the geographic
service area (GSA) as set forth under 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d).
A) For
projects to establish a birth center category of service, the applicant shall
document that at least 50% of the projected patient volume will be residents of
the GSA.
B) For
projects to expand a birth center category of service, the applicant shall
provide patient origin information for all admissions for the last 12-month
period, verifying that at least 50% of admissions were residents of the GSA.
For all other projects, applicants shall document that at least 50% of the
projected patient volume will be from residents of the GSA.
3) Service
Accessibility
The proposed project to establish
or expand a birth center category of service is necessary to improve access for
GSA residents. The applicant shall document the following:
A) Service Restrictions
The applicant shall document that
at least one of the following factors exists in the GSA:
i) The absence of a birth
center within the GSA;
ii) The
area population and existing care system exhibit indicators of medical care problems,
such as high infant mortality;
iii) All
or part of the GSA is located in the Center for Disease Control and
Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index for Social and Economic Status
(accessible at https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/Social-Vulnerability-Index/ypqf-r5qs).
Factors contained within the Social and Economic Status include: number of
persons living below the federal poverty level, a higher civilian unemployment
rate (compared to the State rate), per capita income, and persons (age 25 and older)
without a high school diploma;
iv) Designation
by the U.S. Department of Health Human Services that all or part of the GSA is
located in a Health Professional Shortage Area (https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/shortage-area/hpsa-find)
or a Medically Underserved Area (MUA Find (hrsa.gov);
v) All
existing birth centers within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100.510(d) meet or exceed the utilization standard specified in 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100.820(c).
B) Supporting Documentation
The applicant shall provide the
following documentation, as applicable, concerning existing restrictions to
service access:
i) The
location and utilization of other GSA service providers;
ii) Patient location
information by zip code;
iii) Travel-time studies; and
iv) Scheduling
or admission restrictions that exist with birth centers located within the GSA.
d) Unnecessary Duplication
/ Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary
duplication of birth centers. The applicant shall provide the following
information:
A) A list
of all zip code areas (in total or in part) that are located within the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project's
site;
B) The
total population of the identified zip code areas (based upon the most recent
population estimates available for the State of Illinois); and
C) The
names and locations of all existing or approved birth centers situated within
the established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d).
2) The
applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of
services. Maldistribution exists when the birth centers identified in
subsection (d)(1)(C), as established by 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d), have not
met the target utilization. The applicant shall document the following:
A) Historical
utilization (for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the
application) for existing birth centers within the established radii, as
outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d), of the applicant's site that is
below the utilization standard established pursuant to 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100.820(c); or
B) Insufficient
population to provide the volume or caseload necessary to utilize the birth center
services proposed by the project at or above utilization standards.
3) The
applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the
proposed project will not:
A) lower
the utilization of other birth centers within the GSA below the utilization
standard specified in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.820(c); and
B) lower,
to a further extent, the utilization of other birth centers within the GSA that
are currently (during the latest 12-month period) operating below the
utilization standard.
4) The
applicant shall document that a written request was received by all existing
facilities that provide birth center services located within the established
radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the project site asking the
anticipated impact of the proposed project upon the facility's utilization.
The request shall include a statement that a written response is to be provided
to the applicant no later than 15 days after receipt. Failure by an existing facility
to respond to the applicant's request for information within the prescribed
15-day response period shall constitute an assumption that the existing
facility will not experience an adverse impact on utilization from the
project. Copies of the applicant's request and any correspondence received
from the facilities shall be included in the application.
e) Category of Service -
Modernization
1) If
the project involves modernization of an existing birth center, the applicant
shall document that the existing treatment areas to be modernized have
deteriorated or are functionally obsolete and need to be replaced or
modernized, due to factors such as, but not limited to:
A) High cost of
maintenance;
B) Non-compliance with
licensing or life safety codes;
C) Changes in standards of
care; or
D) Need for additional
space for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
2) Documentation shall
include the most recent:
A) IDPH inspection reports;
and
B) Commission for the
Accreditation of Birth Centers reports.
3) Other
documentation shall include the following, as applicable to the factors cited
in the application:
A) Copies of maintenance
reports;
B) Copies of citations for
life safety code violations; and
C) Other pertinent reports
and data.
f) Staffing Availability
1) An
applicant proposing to establish a birth center category of service shall
document that a sufficient supply of obstetric personnel will be available to
staff the service. Sufficient staff availability shall be based upon evidence
that, for the latest 12-month period prior to submission of the application,
existing birth centers that are located in the GSA (in total or in part), if
any, have not experienced a staffing shortage.
2) A
staffing shortage at a licensed birth center is indicated by an average annual
vacancy rate of more than 10% for budgeted full-time equivalent obstetric
personnel (staff who deliver or assist in the delivery of a newborn). This
staffing includes, but is not limited to, advanced practice registered nurses,
certified nurse midwives, licensed certified professional midwives,
obstetricians, and patient care technicians.
3) The
applicant shall document that a written request for staffing information was
received by all existing licensed birth centers within the GSA, and that the
request included a statement that a written response be provided to the
applicant no later than 15 days after receipt. Failure by an existing licensed
birth center to respond to the applicant's request for information within the
prescribed 15-day response period shall constitute an assumption that the
existing licensed birth center has not experienced staffing vacancy rates in
excess of 10%. Copies of the applicant's request and any correspondence
received from the facilities shall be included in the application.
4) If
more than 25% of the licensed birth centers contacted indicate an experienced
obstetric staffing vacancy rate of more than 10% percent, the applicant shall
provide documentation as to how sufficient staff shall be obtained to operate
the proposed project, in accordance with licensing requirements.
g) Charity Care
A birth center shall provide
charitable care consistent with that provided by comparable health care
providers in the GSA. [210 ILCS 170/40(c)] Documentation shall include a
copy of the charity care policy that will be in effect at the birth center and
copies of charity care policies from other birth centers located within the
GSA. The applicant's charity care policy shall be compared to the other birth
center providers in the GSA. If the applicant's charity care policy is
inconsistent with the charity care policy of birth centers in the GSA, the
applicant shall provide an explanation.
h) Admission Policies
1) For
projects to establish a birth center, an applicant shall document that the birth
center may not discriminate against any patient requiring treatment because of
the source of payment for services, including Medicare and Medicaid recipients.
[210 ILCS 170/40(d)] Documentation shall consist of a signed statement that no
restrictions on admissions due to these factors will occur.
2) For
projects to establish a birth center, an applicant shall document that all
admission protocols, as referenced at 77 Ill. Adm. Code 264.1550, will be
implemented, and followed once the birth center is licensed. Documentation
shall consist of a signed statement that the birth center will adhere to the
established requirements.
i) Transfer Agreement and
Hospital Proximity
For projects to establish a birth
center, an applicant shall document that it will have the mandatory linkage and
integration requirements and that it will have a transfer agreement with a
nearby birthing hospital. An applicant shall document the following:
1) A
birth center shall link and integrate its services with at least one birthing
hospital with a minimum Level 1 perinatal designation. [210 ILCS
170/20(a)] The applicant shall provide an attestation that it will establish
the necessary services.
2) The birth
center shall have an established agreement with a nearby receiving birthing
hospital with policies and procedures for timely transfer of maternal and
neonatal patients. [210 ILCS 170/20(b)] The transfer agreement shall be in
place prior to initiating the planning and construction of the facility. (77
Ill. Adm. Code 264.2770(a)(2)(A)) Patient transfers shall be within 30 minutes
travel time for both rural and nonrural hospitals. (77 Ill. Adm. Code
264.2250(b) and 264.2700(a)(3)) The applicant shall provide a copy of the
transfer agreement in the application for permit (77 Ill. Adm. Code
264.2700(a)(2)(A)).
j) Prenatal Care and
Community Education
For projects to establish a birth
center, the applicant shall document that it offers prenatal care and
community education services and coordinates these services with other health
care services available in the community. [210 ILCS 170/5(4)] The
applicant shall provide a written narrative on how these services will be
offered and coordinated with other health care services in the community.
k) Quality Assurance and
Improvement
For projects to establish a birth
center, the applicant shall document that it shall implement a quality
improvement program consistent with the requirements of the accrediting body
and is encouraged to participate in quality improvement projects implemented by
the Department's Administrative Perinatal Centers and other
Department-supported perinatal quality improvement projects. [210 ILCS
170/35] The applicant shall provide a written narrative on how this
requirement will be implemented at the birth center.
l) Mandatory Reporting of
Data
Per Sections 13 and 14.1 of the
Health Facilities Planning Act and 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.60, licensed birth
centers shall provide HFSRB with data needed for planning. Data provided from
these facilities shall include, but not be limited to, facility capacity,
utilization, and socio-economic information. Data obtained from these
facilities shall be included in the State Board's Inventory of Health Care
Facilities and Services and Need Determinations.
(Source: Added at 48 Ill. Reg. 8945,
effective June 13, 2024)
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.290 DISCONTINUATION REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 1110.290 Discontinuation – Review Criteria
These criteria pertain to the discontinuation of categories
of service and health care facilities.
a) Information Requirements
− Review Criterion
The applicant
shall provide at least the following information:
1) Identification
of the categories of service and the number of beds, if any, that are to be
discontinued;
2) Identification
of all other clinical services that are to be discontinued;
3) The
anticipated date of discontinuation for each identified service or for the
entire facility;
4) The
anticipated use of the physical plant and equipment after discontinuation
occurs;
5) The
anticipated disposition and location of all medical records pertaining to the
services being discontinued and the length of time the records will be
retained;
6) For
applications involving discontinuation of an entire facility, certification by
an authorized representative that all questionnaires and data required by HFSRB
or the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) (e.g., annual
questionnaires, capital expenditures surveys, etc.) will be provided through
the date of discontinuation and that the required information will be submitted
no later than 60 days following the date of discontinuation.
b) Reasons for
Discontinuation − Review Criterion
The applicant shall document that
the discontinuation is justified by providing data that verifies that one or
more of the following factors (and other factors, as applicable) exist with
respect to each service being discontinued:
1) Insufficient
volume or demand for the service;
2) Lack
of sufficient staff to adequately provide the service;
3) The
facility or the service is not economically feasible, and continuation impairs
the facility's financial viability;
4) The
facility or the service is not in compliance with licensing or certification
standards.
c) Impact on Access −
Review Criterion
The applicant shall document whether
the discontinuation of each service or of the entire facility will have an
adverse impact upon access to care for residents of the facility's market
area. The facility's market area, for purposes of this Section, is the
established radii outlined in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d). Factors that
indicate an adverse impact upon access to service for the population of the
facility's market area include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) The
service will no longer exist within the established radii outlined in 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1100.510(d) of the applicant facility;
2) Discontinuation
of the service will result in creating or increasing a shortage of beds or
services, as calculated in the Inventory of Health Care Facilities, which is
described in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.70 and found on HFSRB's website;
3) Facilities
or a shortage of other categories of service at determined by the provisions of
77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 or other Sections of this Part.
d) The
applicant shall provide copies of notification letters sent to other resources
or health care facilities that provide the same services as those proposed for
discontinuation and that are located within the established radii outlined in
77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.510(d). The notification letter must include at least
the anticipated date of discontinuation of the service and the total number of
patients that received care or the number of treatments provided (as
applicable) during the latest 24 month period.
Section 1110.APPENDIX A ASTC Services
 | TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER II: HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES REVIEW BOARD SUBCHAPTER a: ILLINOIS HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PLAN
PART 1110
PROCESSING, CLASSIFICATION POLICIES AND REVIEW CRITERIA
SECTION 1110.APPENDIX B STATE GUIDELINES - SQUARE FOOTAGE AND UTILIZATION
Section 1110.APPENDIX B State
Guidelines − Square Footage and Utilization
The following area standards are established for
departments, clinical service areas and facilities. All Diagnostic and
Treatment utilization numbers are the minimums per unit for establishing more
than one unit, except where noted in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100. HFSRB shall
periodically evaluate the guidelines to determine if revisions should be made.
Any revisions will be promulgated in accordance with the provisions of the
Illinois Administrative Procedure Act.
Definitions pertaining to this Appendix are contained in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1100.220.
HOSPITAL-BASED SERVICES
For hospitals, area determinations for departments and
clinical service areas are to be made in departmental gross square feet (dgsf).
Spaces to be included in the applicant's determination of square footage shall
include all functional areas minimally required by the Hospital Licensing Act,
applicable federal certification, and any additional spaces required by the
applicant's operational program.
|
Service Areas
|
Square Feet/Unit or Key Room
|
Annual Utilization/Unit
|
|
Acute Care
|
|
|
|
Medical-Surgical, Pediatric, Obstetric & Long Term
Acute Care Service
|
500-660 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Newborn Nursery (includes Level
I, Level II, and Level II+ with extended neonatal capabilities)
|
160 dgsf/Obstetrics Bed & LDRP
|
|
|
Labor Delivery Recovery (LDR)
|
1120-1600 dgsf/Room
|
400 Births/LDR Room
|
|
Labor Delivery Recovery Post-partum (LDRP)
|
1120-1600 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
C-Section Suite
|
2075 dgsf/OR
|
800 Procedures/Room
|
|
Acute Mental Illness Service
|
440-560 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Comprehensive Physical Rehabilitation Service
|
525-660 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Hospital Based Long-Term Care
|
440-560 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1100
|
|
Critical Care
|
|
|
|
Intensive Care Service
|
600-685 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Neonatal Intensive Care (NICU) or Level III Nursery
|
434-568 dgsf/Bed or Bassinet
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Diagnostic and
Treatment
|
|
|
|
Diagnostic/Interventional Radiology (Excludes portables
& mobile equipment/Utilization)
|
|
|
|
• General Radiology
|
1300 dgsf/Unit
|
8000 procedures
|
|
• Fluoroscopy/Tomography/Other
X-ray procedures
|
1300 dgsf/Unit
|
6500 procedures
|
|
• Dedicated Chest
|
900 dgsf/Unit
|
9000 procedures
|
|
• Mammography
|
900 dgsf/Unit
|
5000 visits
|
|
• Ultra-Sound
|
900 dgsf/Unit
|
3100 visits
|
|
• Angiography (Special
Procedures)
|
1800 dgsf/Unit
|
1800 visits
|
|
• CT Scan
|
1800 dgsf/Unit
|
7000 visits
|
|
• PET
|
1800 dgsf/Unit
|
3600 visits
|
|
• MRI
|
1800 dgsf/Unit
|
2500 procedures
|
|
• Nuclear Medicine
|
1600 dgsf/Unit
|
2000 visits
|
|
Radiation Therapy
|
|
|
|
• Accelerator
|
2400 dgsf/
Accelerator
|
7500 treatments
|
|
• Simulator
|
1800 dgsf/
Simulator
|
|
|
Emergency Department
|
900 dgsf/ Treatment Station
|
2000 visits/station/year
|
|
Cardiac Catheterization
|
1800 dgsf
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100 for establishment of service 1500 visits/year for additional units
|
|
Ambulatory Care
|
800 dgsf
|
2000 visits/year
|
|
Surgical Operating Suite (Class
C)
|
2750 dgsf/
Operating Room
|
1500 hrs/Operating
Room
|
|
Surgical Procedure Suite (Class
B)
|
1100 dgsf/
Procedure Room
|
1500 hrs/Procedure
Room
|
|
Post-Anesthesia Recovery Phase
I
|
180 dgsf/Recovery Station
|
|
|
Post-Anesthesia Recovery Phase
II
|
400 dgsf/Recovery Station
|
|
|
In-Center Hemodialysis
|
470 dgsf/Station
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
HFSRB NOTE: The standards for
Post-Anesthesia Recovery Phase I and Post-Anesthesia Recovery Phase II shall be
used as the standards for recovery stations associated with Surgical Operating
Suite (Class C) and Surgical Procedure Suite (Class B).
OTHER FACILITIES
The following standards apply to new construction, the
development of freestanding facilities, modernization, and the development of
facilities in existing structures, including the use of leased space. For new
construction, the standards are based upon the inclusion of all building
components and are expressed in building gross square feet (bgsf). For
modernization projects, the standards are based upon interior build-out only
and are expressed in departmental gross square feet (dgsf). Spaces to be
included in the applicant's determination of square footage shall include all
functional areas minimally required for the applicable service areas by the
appropriate rules required for IDPH licensure and/or federal certification and
any additional spaces required by the applicant's operational program.
|
Service Areas
|
Square Feet/Unit
|
Annual Utilization/Unit
|
|
General Long Term Care
|
435-713 bgsf/Bed
350-570 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
ICF/DD Facilities
|
505-580 bgsf/Bed
404-464 dgsf/Bed
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center (ASTC)
|
2075-2750 bgsf/Treatment Room
1660-2200 dgsf/Treatment Room
|
Maximum of 4
recovery stations per operating room 1500 hrs of Surgery/OR or Procedure Room
|
|
• Operating
Room
|
|
• Procedure Room
|
|
• Recovery
|
|
In-Center Hemodialysis
|
450-650
bgsf/Room
360-520 dgsf/Room
|
See 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1100
|
|
Freestanding Emergency Center
|
840-1170 bgsf/Treatment Station
672-936 dgsf/Treatment Station
|
2000 visits/Treatment
Room/year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|