TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.10 DEFINITIONS
Section 700.10 Definitions
"Act"
means the "Farmland Preservation Act" (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 5,
par. 1301 et seq.).
"Agency"
means one of the State agencies listed in Section 3 of the Farmland
Preservation Act.
"Agricultural
land" or "farmland" means all land in farms including cropland,
hayland, pastureland, forestland, corrals, gardens and orchards, land used for
farmsteads, buildings, barns, and machinery sheds, adjacent yards or corrals,
pens, waste lagoons, feedlots, farmstead or feedlot windbreaks, grain bins,
lanes for farm residences and fields, field windbreaks, ponds, commercial
feedlots, greenhouses, nurseries, broiler facilities and farm landing strips.
"Agricultural
land conversion" means the taking of land directly out of agricultural
production or displacing it by another use and not returning it to production.
"BOB"
means the Bureau of the Budget.
"CDB"
or "Board" means the Capital Development Board.
"Committee"
means the Inter-Agency Committee on Farmland Preservation as established in
Section 3 of the Act.
"Compliance"
means conformance to the rules of this Part by an agency that is participating
in a State-funded capital development project or in executing its
responsibilities which will lead to the direct or indirect conversion of
agricultural land to nonagricultural purposes.
"Conflict
Resolution Process" or "CRP" means a procedure utilized to reach
an agreement between DOA and one or more agencies when there are differences on
how to avoid the impact of agricultural land conversion or the loss of such
land as an environmental or food production resource. The Conflict Resolution
Process is explained in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT C.
"Cooperative
Working Agreement" means a written agreement between the DOA and an agency
stating what projects shall be reviewed, when a project shall be reviewed, and
the time limits of the review.
"DCCA"
means the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs.
"DOA"
means the Illinois Department of Agriculture, Division of Natural Resources,
Agriculture Building, State Fairgrounds, P.O. Box 19281, Springfield, Illinois
62794-9281; phone (217) 782-6297.
"DOC"
means the Illinois Department of Conservation.
"DOT"
means the Illinois Department of Transportation.
"ENR"
means the Department of Energy and Natural Resources.
"Exceptions"
means State projects exempted from review to assess impact on agricultural land
as identified in agency working agreements or Section 7 of the Act.
"Executive
Order 80-4, 'Preservation of Illinois Farmland'" means the Executive Order
which directed specific State agencies to develop agricultural land
preservation policies and methods to protect the State's agricultural land as an
environmental or essential food production resource from irreversible
conversion (e.g., buildings, highways, and dams).
"ICC"
means the Illinois Commerce Commission.
"IEPA"
means the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
"Initial
analysis" means a review of an agency's project proposal by the DOA to
determine whether the proposal conforms to the rules of this Part.
"Land
class" means one of eight classes of land in the Land Capability
Classification System (Handbook 210, issued September, 1961, and approved for
reprinting January, 1973) as developed by the Soil Conservation Service, United
States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.. Incorporation by reference
does not include any future editions or amendments. The land capability classification
shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field
crops. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops,
the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to
management.
"Modern
soil survey" means a document published after 1965 by the Soil
Conservation Service, containing a description of a county's soils, maps
showing their distribution and discussions concerning their behavior and
adaptability.
"Policy
statement" means a written statement developed by each agency named in
Section 3 of the Act which specifies the policy of that agency toward
agricultural land preservation.
"Secondary
impact" means an action taken by an agency which does not convert
agricultural land directly but does create a more favorable climate for
conversion to take place or may create unfavorable conditions for normal
farming operations. Unfavorable conditions occur when a project requires a
farmer to deviate from his normal farming operations. For example, the
granting of a permit for the installation of a water line may not convert land
directly, but the presence of the line increases the likelihood that the
surrounding area will be developed.
"Sign-off"
means written notification to the affected agency by the DOA which indicates
that the manner in which agricultural land is addressed in a project proposal
or in a compromise is in compliance with the rules of this Part and that the
DOA has completed its review.
"Study of
Agricultural Impacts" or "Agricultural Impact Study" means the
analysis of a proposed project not in compliance with the Act or the rules of
this Part to determine the probable impact on the agriculture environment.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.20 REQUIREMENTS OF POLICY STATEMENTS AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENTS
Section 700.20 Requirements
of Policy Statements and Cooperative Working Agreements
a) The policy of each agency toward farmland preservation and the
working agreements shall be as stated in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDICES A-J.
b) Policy statements shall contain the following information:
1) An explanation of the agency's responsibilities and a
description of the various regulations, programs, procedures and operations
employed by the agency to fulfill its mandate.
2) An analysis of how the agency's responsibilities and
undertakings might result in farmland conversion.
3) Measures that can be implemented by the agency to avoid or
mitigate farmland conversion.
c) The DOA shall submit copies of each policy statement and
working agreement to the following:
1) the Governor;
2) the General Assembly;
3) each member of the Committee;
4) the State Library; and
5) the public upon request.
d) Every three years, each agency shall update its policy
statement and working agreement or certify in writing to the DOA that its
policy statement and/or working agreement on file as rules are accurate. The
updated policy statements and working agreements shall be sent to the DOA for
review and approval. The DOA shall notify in writing each agency of approval
or the reasons for disapproval of the documents.
1) Policy statements shall be approved if:
A) The revised policy statement states the agency's obligation and
responsibility to protect farmland;
B) The policy statement explains the effect the agency's program
will have on farmland conversion; and
C) The policy statement identifies the measures the agency shall
utilize to protect farmland from unnecessary conversion (see Project Proposal
Requirements in Section 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT B).
2) The approval of the working agreements shall be based on:
A) Identification of projects which are exempt from DOA's review;
B) The identification of changes, if any, from the previous
working agreement;
C) Identification of the point in time when an agency will notify
the DOA of a proposed project;
D) The time limits of the review; and
E) The time when the review will start.
3) If, after the review of a policy statement or working
agreement, an agency and the DOA are not in agreement, the conflict resolution
process shall be invoked by the DOA.
4) Certification or update of existing policy statements and
working agreements shall be submitted to the DOA at least six (6) months before
the expiration of existing policy statements and working agreements.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.30 REVIEW OF AGENCY PROJECT PROPOSALS
Section 700.30 Review of
Agency Project Proposals
The DOA shall review
State-funded capital project proposals to determine whether they possess the
potential to convert farmland to a nonagricultural use. The procedure
described in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT A, the Illinois
Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement,
shall be followed to review project proposals.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.40 REPORT: THE TRACKING OF FARMLAND CONVERTED BY STATE ACTIVITIES
Section 700.40 Report: The
Tracking of Farmland Converted by State Activities
a) Based upon information provided by the agencies, the DOA shall
prepare an annual report identifying the number of acres converted from
agricultural to nonagricultural use as a result of State action.
b) Each agency shall submit the following information to the DOA
in the described format:
1) Agency name;
2) Period of time covered by the report; and
3) The report shall be divided into two parts:
A) Except as provided by the agency's working agreement, Part One
shall contain:
i) The number of acres converted by an agency's acquisition of
land in fee simple and by permanent easements; and
ii) The land use of acreage at the time of acquisition. The land
use shall be identified using the definitions contained in 8 Ill. Adm. Code
700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT D.
B) Except as provided by the agency's working agreements, Part Two
shall contain:
i) The number of acres converted by an agency's activities when
acting as administrator, grantor, technical reviewer or regulator. To
illustrate, should the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency provide a grant
for the construction of a wastewater treatment plant and the project required
acquisition of fifteen acres of farmland, the acreage shall be recorded as
converted.
ii) The land use of acreage at the time of acquisition. The land
use shall be identified using the definitions contained in 8 Ill. Adm. Code
700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT D.
C) A general map of Illinois shall be provided as part of the
report showing land converted in both categories and data shall be summarized
by county and depicted on the map for each category identified in 8 Ill. Adm. Code
700.40(b)(3)(A)(i) and 700.40(b)(3)(B)(i).
D) An agency may provide an explanation or discussion of the data
submitted, and such information shall be included in the report.
c) Each agency shall submit the information for the report to the
DOA no later than November 1 of each year.
d) The DOA shall by March 1 submit the report to those named in
Section 6 of the Act.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX A Illinois Department of Agriculture
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX A ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Section 700.APPENDIX A Illinois
Department of Agriculture
Section 700.EXHIBIT A Illinois
Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement
Policy
Statement
The Illinois Department of
Agriculture (DOA) recognizes the importance of the agricultural industry to the
health of the state's economy. The agricultural industry cannot continue to
contribute to the state's economic well-being with the unwarranted destruction
of its finite land base. Therefore, it shall be the policy of the DOA to
promote the protection of Illinois farmland from unnecessary conversion and
degradation. The methods to be utilized in implementing the policy are
described in 8 Ill. Reg. 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT B. Except for the DuQuoin
State Fairgrounds, the DOA does not have any programs or activities that
acquire or convert agricultural land.
DOA
Efforts to Protect
Illinois
Farmland
The DOA has been designated as
the lead agency in carrying out the state's farmland protection program. In
fulfilling that role, the DOA shall institute the following efforts:
1. The DOA shall sign cooperative working agreements with the
agencies named in Section 3 of the Act to identify which agency projects shall
be subject to review to assess impact on agricultural land and to specify how
the mechanics of the project review shall take place.
2. The DOA shall continue to implement the Project Review Process
(see 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT B).
3. When a conflict exists between the DOA and an agency on
avoiding or reducing the conversion of agricultural land to nonagricultural use
and/or secondary impacts, the DOA shall utilize the steps outlined in the
conflict resolution process (see 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX A: EXHIBIT C).
4. Since the majority of the decisions which lead to the
conversion of farmland are made at the local level, the DOA shall be continue
to execute an assistance program for local governments wishing to devise
farmland protection programs.
5. The DOA shall continue its public information program to
increase awareness of the problems resulting from the conversion of farmland.
The program shall include utilizing the news media, regional seminars, speaking
engagements to organizations and educational institutions, preparation of
pamphlets, brochures and other written material, and other informational
activities.
(July, 1987, revised)
(Source: Exhibit A renumbered from Appendix A and amended at 11 Ill.
Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX A ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Section 700.APPENDIX A
Illinois Department of Agriculture
Section 700.EXHIBIT B The
Proposed Project Review Process
Introduction
The DOA shall conduct reviews of
agency project proposals which will or have the potential of converting
farmland to nonagricultural use. The agencies shall notify the DOA in writing
when a project proposal is eligible for review. The DOA shall then determine
whether or not the project is in compliance with the agency's policy statement
and working agreement. If the project is not in compliance, the DOA shall
conduct a study of agricultural impacts on the project to assess its impact on
farmland.
Notification
Review Eligibility
State agency projects shall be eligible for review if:
1. the agency is listed in Section 3 of the Act;
2. the project is supported wholly or in part by state capital
development funds; or
3. the project causes farmland conversion or encourages farmland
conversion through secondary impacts; or
4. notification of the project is processed through the
Governor's Office.
Review Exemptions
State agency projects shall be exempt from review if:
1. the working agreement excludes the project under
consideration; or
2. the project has been exempted by Section 7 of the Act.
Transference of Project Proposal
to the DOA
When an agency project will lead to the conversion of farmland, the
agency shall:
1. notify the Director of the DOA of the project in writing; and
2. provide the written notification to the DOA at the point in
the agency's planning process specified in the cooperative working agreement.
Project Proposal Information
Requirements
The written notification provided to DOA shall include the
following information describing the project to enable the DOA to determine
compliance:
1. Project description (purpose and scope);
2. Map indicating specific project location in the county;
3. Modern soil survey map (if available) showing precise project
boundaries;
4. Identification of the number of acres contained within the
project boundaries;
5. Identification of all land classes (I-VIII) lying within
project boundaries and the number of acres contained within each land class, if
available;
6. Identification of the site's zoning designation(s) and whether
the project is in compliance with an officially adopted comprehensive land use
plan designating land uses in the project area, if applicable;
7. Identification of the land use within the project area and of
that land contiguous to the project area;
8. Identification of secondary impacts which may result from
implementation of the project (e.g., drainage, farmland devaluation, increased
travel time incurred by the agricultural land owner, and potential development
created by gas, water or sewer lines);
9. The project proposal shall discuss how the size and location
of the proposed project shall meet and not exceed the goals of the project
thereby avoiding unnecessary farmland conversion;
10. Rationale for the selection of the project site;
11. Name, address and telephone number of individual who provided
the above information;
12. The project proposal shall describe how the farmland
preservation policy has been followed and what steps were taken to minimize the
proposed project's impact upon agricultural land; and
13. The information above shall be included for each alternative
location examined in the project proposal.
Review
Time Limitation
The DOA shall
complete its study of the project proposal within thirty (30) days of receipt
of the project proposal within thirty (30) days of receipt of written
notification with all required information, if a study is required. If the
study is not completed within that time limit, the agency may proceed with the
proposal without the benefit of the DOA's comments.
Determination of Compliance
Upon receipt of written notification, the DOA shall conduct
an initial analysis of the proposed project to ascertain whether it complies
with the policy statement and working agreement as adopted as rules under the
Farmland Preservation Act and Project Proposal Information Requirements.
The DOA's initial analysis shall
result in one of two actions:
1. If the project is found to be in compliance, the DOA shall
provide the agency with a sign-off letter.
2. If the project is not in compliance, the DOA shall initiate a
study of agricultural impacts.
Study of Agricultural Impacts
The study of
agricultural impacts is performed by the DOA to ascertain the level of
disruption placed upon the agricultural environment by the project proposal.
It is composed of a review of Project Proposal Information Requirements, of the
total annual agricultural productivity that is displaced when a site devoted to
agricultural use is converted to non-agricultural purposes, and the criteria
enumerated below:
1) Distance between the project site and the nearest city.
2) Proximity of a central water system to the project site.
3) Proximity of central water disposal system (sewer) to the
project site.
4) The type (e.g., earthen, aggregate, hard surface) of
transportation facility that provides access to the project site.
5) Existing land use adjacent to the site.
6) Zoning classification of the land adjacent to the site.
7) Percentage of the project site contained within an adopted
Agricultural Area.
8) Impact on the proposed project upon agricultural businesses.
9) Percent of the area devoted to agricultural use within 1½
miles of the project site.
10) Percent of the project site currently in agricultural use.
11) Soil limitations (e.g., high water table, flooding, slope of
the parcel, frost heave) on the project site for the proposed use.
12) Soil productivity (crop yields).
13) The acreage of each land class.
The DOA shall
provide a copy of the study to the persons and agencies listed in Section 5 of
the Act and to the public upon written request. The conflict resolution
process shall be invoked if the project is not in compliance with policy
statements and working agreement, and the DOA and the originating agency cannot
reach a compromise on how to avoid or reduce the impact on agricultural land.
The conflict resolution process shall be invoked by DOA within 5 working days
of DOA's determination that a compromise cannot be achieved.
(Source: Exhibit B renumbered from
Exhibit A and amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX A ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Section 700.APPENDIX A
Illinois Department of Agriculture
Section 700.EXHIBIT C
Conflict Resolution Process
When a project is not in
compliance with a policy statement and/or working agreement and a compromise
cannot be reached, or an agreement cannot be reached on the contents of a
policy statement or working agreement when updating these documents, conflicts
shall be resolved quickly at the lowest level of agency involvement. Toward
this aim, the following four-stage, standard procedure shall be followed. The
process is initiated at the staff level and, if the conflict cannot be
resolved, moves up the ladder of responsibility ending in the Governor's
office. At each stage, personnel from one agency shall work with his/her
counterpart in the other agency. A time frame has been built into the system
to keep the process moving in an expeditious manner.
STAGE I (21 days): (A) When a conflict arises, the professional staffs
of the agencies involved in the conflict shall meet and attempt to resolve the
disagreement (Part A – 14 days). (B) If the matter is not resolved after 14
days, the DOA Bureau Chief shall meet with his/her counterpart in the other
agency (Part B – 7 days).
STAGE II (14 days): If no resolution is reached, representatives at the
next management level (equivalent to DOA's Division head) shall meet to discuss
the conflict.
STAGE III (14 days): If the conflict remains unresolved, the matter
shall be submitted to the Directors of the agencies involved.
STAGE IV (14 days): If a satisfactory solution cannot be found, the
conflict shall be referred to the Office of the Governor for resolution.
(Source: Exhibit C renumbered from
Exhibit B and amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 20527, effective December 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX A ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Section 700.APPENDIX A
Illinois Department of Agriculture
Section 700.EXHIBIT D Land
Use Definitions
Cropland – Land utilized for the
production of cultivated, close growing row, fruit or nut crops for harvest.
Cropland includes the following applications:
Horticulture
Fruit
Nut
Vineyard
Bush Fruit
Berries
Flowers
Other Horticulture
Row and Close Grown
Corn
Soybeans
Wheat
Oats
Sorghum
Barley
Rye
Vegetables
Sunflowers
Other Cropland – Cropland that
is idle or placed in set-aside or similar state or federal government programs,
or devoted to crops not mentioned above.
Hayland – Land managed for the
production of forage crops that are machine harvested. Forages are classified
as grasses, legumes or a combination of grasses and legumes.
Forages – All
browse and herbaceous food that is available to livestock or game animals used
for grazing or harvested for feeding.
Legumes – One
of the major groups of forage plants utilized as food for animals. This
classification includes principally alfalfa, clovers, trefoil, lespedezas,
vetches, and kudzu. Soybeans, peas and beans are also contained within this
broad groupings; however, for the purpose of annually reporting the amount of
farmland converted to nonagricultural uses as a result of state agency action,
these crops shall be categorized under the cropland designation.
Pastureland – Land used for the
production of adopted, introduced or native forage plants for livestock
grazing.
Forestland – Land utilized for
growing trees of any species whether or not managed for timber products. Such
lands minimally contain sixty (60) trees per acre when average diameter at
breast height (DBH) of the stand is less than five (5) inches, or twenty (20)
trees per when DBH average for the stand is five (5) inches and larger.
Farmstand – That part of a farm
that is occupied by the dwellings, buildings, adjacent yards or corrals, plus
family gardens and orchards in which the produce is utilized for family
consumption. Land in farmsteads includes land used for barns, machinery sheds,
grain bins, waste lagoons, feedlots, pens, corrals and farmstead or feedlot
windbreaks. Lanes to farm residences are considered part of the farmstead.
Research and Experimentation Land – Land utilized for research farms and experiment stations.
Other Land in Farms – Areas of
farms not classified as cropland, pastureland, hayland or forestland. Other
land in farms includes field windbreaks, ponds, commercial feedlots,
confinements, greenhouses, nurseries, and broiler facilities. Field lanes and
field landing strips are also included within this classification.
Other Land – Land used for
residences, industrial sites, commercial sites, construction sites,
institutional sites, public administrative sites, railroad yards, cemeteries,
airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment plants, water
control structures, and spillways.
(Source: Exhibit D renumbered from Exhibit C and amended at 11 Ill. Reg.
20527, effective December 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX B Illinois Bureau of the Budget's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement and Cooperative Working Agreement
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX B ILLINOIS BUREAU OF THE BUDGET'S AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX B Illinois
Bureau of the Budget's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement and
Cooperative Working Agreement
I. FARMLAND PRESERVATION POLICY
The Illinois State Clearinghouse
(Office of the Governor) is responsible for coordinating the gubernatorial
review and analysis of grant applications and ensuring that they are consistent
with existing state policies. The Bureau of the Budget (BOB) is responsible
for the gubernatorial review and analysis of state capital plans and grant
applications. In view of these major functions, the BOB/Office of the Governor
shall implement the following activities pursuant to the Farmland Preservation
Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.).
1. The review of state capital plans.
State capital
plans will be reviewed to determine their degree of compliance with farmland
preservation policies (8 Ill. Adm. Code 700). The desired outcome of this
effort will be improved state agency plans reflecting a concern for
preservation of agricultural land in Illinois.
2. Assist the Department of Agriculture (DOA) in the review of
federal grant applications which identify state and federal projects that will
impact agricultural land. The Office of the Governor and the DOA will also
strive to identify and resolve potential conflicts between proposed state
agency projects and state farmland preservation goals.
3. Coordinate the review of State agency projects, applications
for Federal assistance, contracts, plans and agreements utilizing the revised
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, 48 FR 3075
(1983)) and Section 5.1 of "AN ACT to create a Bureau of the Budget and to
define its powers and duties and to make an appropriation" (Ill. Rev.
Stat. 1985, ch. 127, par. 415) (State Review of Federal Programs) processes and
mechanisms.
The Office of
the Governor shall process and monitor all projects and applications covered by
Executive Order 12372 and "AN ACT to create a Bureau of the Budget and to
define its powers and duties and to make an appropriation" for compliance
with Illinois' Farmland Preservation goals.
In fulfilling
this task, BOB/Office of the Governor shall:
* identify individual state and federal projects displaying a
potential impact upon agricultural land.
* provide weekly descriptions (Notices of Intent) to state
agencies and to local and regional planning bodies of individual proposals
submitted which demonstrate a potential for effecting agricultural lands.
* request that state agency projects, especially those involving
capital development, routinely include information which will allow reviewers
(state agencies and local planning bodies) to ascertain the proposal's impact
upon agricultural lands.
II. CONCLUSION
The Bureau of the Budget and
Office of the Governor recognize that land is one of Illinois' most valuable
natural resources. The BOB and Office of the Governor will cooperate in the
effort of the State of Illinois to minimize the conversion of land, valued for
its agricultural products, to non-agricultural uses.
(July, 1987; revised)
ILLINOIS
BUREAU OF THE BUDGET – ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
The Bureau of the Budget/Office
of the Governor and the Illinois Department of Agriculture agree to the
following:
1. The Governor's Office will provide the DOA with all
Applications for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) for the DOA's review of
project proposals which may have an impact upon agricultural lands. Accordingly,
the following procedures will apply.
A. The Governor's Office will forward the applications to the DOA
on a weekly basis.
B. The DOA will review the applications to determine if they
qualify for the Study of Agricultural Impacts (8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix
A: Exhibit B).
C. If the DOA determines that a Study of Agricultural Impacts is
necessary, the DOA will notify the Governor's Office immediately in writing
that a Study will be conducted. Subsequently, the Governor's Office will withhold
its sign-off until the DOA has completed its Study of Agricultural Impacts or
has received written notification from the DOA that an agreement has been
reached on minimizing the negative agricultural impacts associated with the
project(s).
D. If, within 30 working days of receipt of the application by the
DOA, the Governor's Office has not been contacted by the DOA regarding the
submitted application, the Governor's Office will assume the DOA has no
objections and will proceed with the sign-off of the project(s).
2. Should either agency experience changes in policy or
procedures which would alter the manner in which the agreement would be
executed, the sister agency shall be informed for the purpose of negotiating a
new agreement.
3. This Cooperative Working Agreement and the associated
Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement shall be the governing document
for the Bureau of the Budget/Office of the Governor and shall not be preempted
in whole nor in part by any other agency's agreement.
(July, 1987; revised)
(Source: Amended at 12 Ill. Reg. 5235, effective March 4, 1988)
Section 700.APPENDIX C Capital Development Board
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX C CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Section 700.APPENDIX C Capital
Development Board
Section 700.EXHIBIT A Capital
Development Board's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement
I. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD PROCEDURES
In its role as the State's
builder, the Capital Development Board (CDB) provides technical assistance to
user agencies in constructing new or rehabilitating present facilities. The CDB
is given site selection and land acquisition authority by the General Assembly
on selected major new construction proposals. All other land selection and
acquisition involvement by the CDB requires the input of user agencies and is
usually limited to technical evaluation of user proposed sites for suitability
for the facility under consideration.
Because of the construction role
it plays for user agencies, the CDB does not "own" land in the
traditional sense. Site selection and land acquisition by the CDB occur on a
project by project basis only, and are accomplished as part of the Agency's
capital construction responsibilities. Ownership of land by the CDB continues
only for the duration of construction of capital facilities. The completed
facility and site are then transferred to the user agency or the Department of
Central Management Services.
The following description of CDB
procedures highlights those steps which involve site selection and land
acquisition. Capital project development varies slightly for different types
of agencies. For the majority of projects, the CDB role in site selection is
secondary to that of the user agencies. Often, agencies acquire land for
projects prior to CDB's administration of the project. This is especially true
for school districts with local boards, including elementary and secondary
schools, area vocational centers, and community colleges.
In other instances, an agency
may have identified but not purchased a potential site prior to CDB
administration. In these cases, the CDB may approve and then acquire the site
for the agency.
For a small number of projects,
the CDB has administered site acquisition from the identification of potential
locations through site selection and final purchase of the land. The final
determinant as to the extent of the CDB's involvement in land acquisition is
the appropriation legislation passed by the General Assembly.
In relation to site selection
and land acquisition, user agencies can be grouped into the four basic
categories listed in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix C: Table A.
The CDB land acquisition
activities related to each of these groups (8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix C:
Table A) are identified in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix C: Table B, which
describes the CDB's "Project Development Process." As shown, the
extent of the CDB's involvement in site selection and land acquisition varies
according to user and type of project. In most cases, assistance is provided
to user agencies in the form of programmatic review of the planned facility,
technical evaluation of a proposed location, and review of site appraisals.
Findings of the CDB's reviews are then given to the user for further
consideration. Actual land acquisition is accomplished by the user.
In addition to providing
technical reviews of proposed facility locations, the CDB can also approve and
acquire user proposed sites, or select and purchase sites for a user agency.
These situations usually arise in conjunction with a major new facility to be
constructed.
II. AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS OF CDB
PROCEDURES
The agricultural impact of the
CDB land acquisition procedures are normally minimal by virtue of the limits of
authority granted to the CDB, user agency involvement, and the type and
location of land usually acquired. In those cases where the CDB has been
solely responsible for land acquisition or has approved and acquired a user
proposed location, many of the sites have been located in urban, center-city
settings. Acquisition of such sites in the future will result in minimal, if
any, agricultural impacts. However, an adverse agricultural impact can occur
in those instances when rural sites are acquired by the CDB or by the user
agencies for new facilities.
III. MEASURES TO MITIGATE
ADVERSE AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS
Future adverse impacts on
agricultural land can be minimized by instituting policy changes in the CDB
site selection and land acquisition procedures. A description of the
mitigation measures is provided in 8 Ill. Adm. Code. 700.Appendix C: Exhibit
B, as they relate to the various types of CDB user agencies. The measures
comprise the CDB's basic Agricultural Land Preservation Policy.
(June, 1987; revised)
(Source: Exhibit A renumbered for Appendix C and amended at 11 Ill. Reg.
18569, effective November 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX C CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Section
700.APPENDIX C Capital Development Board
Section 700.EXHIBIT B CDB
Agricultural Land Conversion Mitigation Measures
1. The site is subject to review and CDB will notify the Illinois
Department of Agriculture (DOA) of proposed sites involving possible farmland
conversion if:
a) the proposed site is greater than ten (10) acres in size, and
b) the proposed site is located outside the corporate boundaries
of a municipality.
2. A Study of Agricultural Impact will be prepared by the DOA on
potential project sites that are subject to the DOA's review. The results of
the study will be forwarded to the CDB for incorporation into the CDB's
programmatic and technical reviews (Step 4 in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix C:
Table B) of user budget requests.
3. The findings of the DOA's study will be submitted to the CDB
in accordance with Section 700.Appendix A: Exhibit B(3) to avoid delays in
budget formulation or in decision making during project execution.
4. When a Study of Agricultural Impacts is conducted, the CDB's
programmatic review process will reflect the consideration of agricultural land
conversion impacts of the proposed project sites.
5. In cases where the CDB has sole responsibility for site
selection and land acquisition, or approves and acquires a user proposed site,
an agricultural land conversion impact factor will be incorporated into the
site evaluation process.
6. The CDB Architect/Engineer Project Manual will include design
considerations for agricultural land impacts when a Study of Agricultural
Impacts has been prepared.
These mitigation measures will be implemented by the CDB as the basis of
the CDB's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy.
(Source: Exhibit B renumbered from
Exhibit A and amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX C CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Section 700.APPENDIX C
Capital Development Board
Section 700.EXHIBIT C
Capital Development Board – Illinois Department of Agriculture Cooperative
Working Agreement
The Capital Development Board
(CDB) and the Illinois Department of Agriculture (DOA) agree to the following
in regard to the implementation of the Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev.
Stat. 1985, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.):
1. The CDB will provide official notification to the DOA for user
agency land acquisition budget proposals or those projects solely administered
by the CDB if:
a) the proposed site is greater than ten (10) acres in size, and
b) the proposed site is located outside the corporate boundaries
of a municipality.
2. The notification will include specific project information in
accordance with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A: Exhibit B, "Project
Proposal Information Requirements."
3. The DOA hereby agrees to complete its Study of Agricultural
Impacts in accordance with the provisions of 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A:
Exhibit B, "Time Limitations," and submit the findings of the study
to the CDB in order to be incorporated into the CDB's budget request review
process.
4. The CDB will not release information to the general public
relative to a final decision on a project site(s) which falls under the DOA's
purview until the official Study of Agricultural Impacts has been completed and
conflicts (if any) with the DOA regarding the site(s) in question are resolved.
5. If a project is not in compliance with the CDB Agricultural
Land Preservation Policy and/or Cooperative Working Agreement and a compromise
cannot be reached, the DOA shall invoke the Conflict Resolution Process (8 Ill.
Adm. Code 700.Appendix A: Exhibit C).
6. All revisions to this agreement shall be made after
consultation with, and concurrence by, both parties.
(June, 1987;
Revised)
(Source: Added at 11 Ill. Reg.
18569, effective November 2, 1987)
Section
700.APPENDIX C Capital Development Board
Section
700.TABLE A CDB User Agency Designation in Relation to Land Acquisition
|
GROUP
|
USER
|
|
1
|
Local School Districts
(Capital Assistance Program)
|
|
|
Area Vocational Districts
(Vocational-Educational Centers)
|
|
|
Community College Districts
(Community Colleges)
|
|
2
|
Higher Education Institutions
(State Colleges and Universities)
|
|
3
|
Code Agencies
|
|
|
Elected Officials
|
|
4
|
Port Districts
|
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX C
Capital Development Board
Section 700.TABLE
B Capital Project Development Process
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
1. User agency identifies a need for a new facility.
Land
Acquisition Activity
Local school
district, area vocational district, or community college acquires site if not
already owned by district.
Other users
may select and acquire site or defer action to later stages of budget
development.
2. Project program statement prepared by user and/or Board
Programming Section. A program statement is the description of the
architectural and engineering requirements for the activities of agency units
which will occupy a buildings. Also included is the identification of a site
or the need for acquisition of a site for the proposed project.
3. Capital budget request prepared by user agency (for CDB and
BOB).
4. Board Programming Section in conjunction with Technical
Services Section reviews user request for adequacy of program statement,
dollars, and long-range need.
Land
Acquisition Activity
The CDB
would provide land acquisition assistance to higher education institutions,
code agencies, elected officials, if site not already acquired. Such assistance
may include:
a) Programming Section reviews proposed site in relation to
program statement.
b) Technical Services Section conducts technical evaluation of
site in relation to such criteria as utilities, access, subsidence, soil
capability and results of DOA's Study of Agricultural Impacts.
c) Land Acquisition Unit obtains and reviews appraisals and
Attorney General's opinion on the property.
5. Construction element cost estimates verified by Technical
Services Section.
6. Governor's capital program prepared.
7. Appropriation legislation drafted by the CDB and Bureau of
the Budget.
CAPITAL BUDGET ENACTMENT
8. Appropriation bills introduced.
9. Information supplied to legislative staff by the CDB and
user.
10. Passage and signature by Governor.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
11. Request for release of funds by user and the CDB.
12. Architect/Engineer selected/approved by the CDB.
13. Governor's release of funds.
Land
Acquisition Activity
Higher
education institutions and port districts acquire land if not already owned.
Code
agencies and elected officials acquire land if not already owned or the CDB
acquires site for proposed project.
14. Design phase; the CDB and user agency approved A/E design for
construction.
15. Advertisement, bidding, and award of construction contracts by
the CDB.
16. Construction phase; the CDB monitors work of A/E and
contractor through construction.
17. Transfer of completed work from the CDB to user or Department
of Central Management Services.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX C
Capital Development Board
Section 700.TABLE C Capital
Development Board - Agricultural Land Conversion Mitigation Measures (Repealed)
(Source: Repealed at 11 Ill. Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX D Illinois Department of Conservation
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX D ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Section 700.APPENDIX D Illinois
Department of Conservation
Section 700.EXHIBIT A Agricultural
Land Preservation Policy Statement and Cooperative Agreement
INTRODUCTION
The Department
of Conservation (DOC) has stewardship responsibilities for conserving and
managing the aquatic, wildlife and forest resources of the state; preserving
and protecting nature preserves, endangered species, historic, cultural, and
archaeological resources; acquiring, developing and operating state parks and
other outdoor recreation facilities; and providing a wide range of outdoor
recreation opportunities for Illinois citizens (see 8 Ill. Adm. Code
700.Appendix D: Exhibit B). In carrying out these varied responsibilities,
the DOC acquires and manages land, develops both site specific plans and
statewide comprehensive recreation and natural resource plans, administers
grant programs, reviews environmental impacts of proposed projects, and provides
technical assistance regarding conservation practices.
The DOC is a
major land-holding agency, and as such, a potential impact of DOC programs, and
operations on agricultural land conversion is through land acquisition. The
types of lands of greatest interest to the DOC for acquisition include areas
with unique natural resources, significant fish and wildlife habitat values,
scenic qualities and recreation potential. In general, land currently in
agricultural production is not the type of land desired by the DOC; however,
lands acquired by the Department may have the potential for agricultural use.
To meet its statutory responsibilities, the DOC must give highest priority to
its programs for the protection of the state's natural, cultural and recreational
resources. Therefore, the DOC will continue to emphasize conservation of these
resources in acquisition, permit review and other programs.
In many cases,
land acquisition by the DOC has a positive impact on agriculture. Management
practices are carried out to conserve the soil and thus prevent soil erosion.
Committing the land to open space maintains the land's potential for future
agricultural use. The same options would not be available for lands converted
to housing developments, industrial complexes or other uses where soils have
been severely disturbed or covered with asphalt and concrete.
BACKGROUND
During the six
fiscal years, FY 1981 - FY 1986, the DOC purchased or provided grants for the
purchase of 13,893 acres of land. Of this acreage, 20.1% was cropland, 2.1% was
pastureland, 41.5% was forestland, and 36.3% was other land (old fields,
urbanlands, water bodies, brushlands, and prairie, etc.).
In FY 86, the
DOC was responsible for approximately 12% of the total estimated 32,212 acres
of Illinois farmland which was purchased and converted or otherwise influenced
by an action of any of the 9 state capital development agencies that same
fiscal year. It should be noted, however, that not all agricultural land which
was purchased by the DOC was actually converted to non-agricultural uses. Some
agricultural land purchased by the DOC continued to be managed for agricultural
purposes.
As of June 30,
1986, the DOC owned and managed a total of 358,103 acres of land. In calendar
year 1986 the DOC leased out 17,066 acres for farming. In addition,
significant acres were planted in crops by the DOC. These farmed areas include
lands producing food and cover for wildlife, and lands the DOC may develop at
some time in the future, but in the interim remain in crop production.
AGRICULTURAL
LAND PRESERVATION POLICY
The Illinois
Department of Conservation's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy has been
developed in response to the Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985,
Ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.). The Department of Conservation (DOC) recognizes the
need to prevent farmland from being unnecessarily converted to non-farm uses.
Accordingly, DOC will fully comply with the Farmland Preservation Act by
planning, adopting and implementing a policy to minimize the conversion of
agricultural land while at the same time fulfilling its statutory mission.
Further, the
DOC will cooperate with the Illinois Department of Agriculture (DOA) in
protecting Illinois' farmland from unnecessary conversion by participating on
the Inter-Agency Committee on Farmland Preservation, and by adhering to the
Cooperative Working Agreement with the DOA. Any conversion of agricultural
land by DOC will follow the intent of this Agricultural Land Preservation
Policy and the DOA-DOC Cooperative Working Agreement.
Following is
the DOC's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy as it pertains to various
agency functions.
LAND ACQUISITION
Acquisition of
land by DOC has the greatest potential impact on agriculture. Therefore, it
will be the policy of the DOC to minimize acquisition of Class I, II, and III
lands and to strongly consider less-than-fee-simple acquisition. Further, for
any DOC acquisition project, the acreage in Class I through VIII soils will be
determined, if possible, and this information weighed in the decision-making
process.
The current DOC
acquisition program comprises several components or sub-programs:
1. Natural Area Acquisition
An important
part of the DOC land acquisition program is acquisition of natural areas – areas
of land and water that closely reflect presettlement conditions. These areas
include forests, prairies, wetlands, endangered species habitats, geologic
areas, and other areas with unique natural qualities. While these lands may
have the potential for agricultural use if they were clearcut, drained and
plowed, they represent the most unique and least disturbed natural lands in the
state and, therefore, should be preserved in their natural condition. Because
only .07 of one percent of Illinois' landscape remains as it was at the time of
settlement, the need to protect these few areas becomes most apparent.
The DOC's
acquisition of natural areas will focus on acquiring those areas identified on
the Illinois Natural Areas Inventory (a comprehensive study of the entire
state, carried out between 1975 and 1978, locating 1,089 remaining natural
areas statewide), or those areas that meet the requirements to be included in
the Inventory, e.g., endangered and threatened species habitat, which is
seriously threatened, an area with features not already represented in a
preserved site, and an area in a region of the state with few preserved natural
features. These priorities for acquisition of natural areas were established
as part of the 1980 "Illinois Natural Areas Plan: To Preserve and Protect
Our Heritage."
Normally,
the acquisition of inventoried natural areas will not include land in
agricultural production. In some cases, however, acquisition of additional
land surrounding the natural area will be necessary in order to provide access
or maintain buffer to protect the natural area. In these situations,
alternatives to fee simple acquisition, such as conservation leases and
easements, will be considered. In some cases, these alternatives could allow
compatible farming practices to continue while at the same time providing
protection for the natural area. Outright purchase will be considered when the
conditions for the other options, such as leases and easements, cannot be
agreed upon with the owner.
2. Expansion
Acquisition
A second
type of DOC land acquisition effort involves expansion of existing DOC
properties. Acquisition to expand existing facilities will be in accordance
with comprehensive site plans or other site planning products for the property,
e.g., feasibility and special studies. Comprehensive site plans provide
specific development, management, use and acquisition direction. An analysis
of the agricultural impacts will be integrated into the comprehensive site
planning process as an additional criterion.
When
acquisition of farmland is proposed within a site plan prepared prior to the
Governor's Executive Order Number Four, another evaluation of these parcels
will be conducted prior to actually purchasing the land, in order to ensure
that they remain essential. In evaluating these parcels, the DOC will
investigate the feasibility of less-than-fee-simple acquisition (e.g., conservation
leases or easements) as an alternative to outright purchase. In preparing
future site plans, the potential for utilizing less-than-fee-simple acquisition
will also be explored as part of the planning process. Considerations will
include management goals, relative cost, and landowner preference.
For sites
lacking comprehensive planning direction, any proposed acquisition will be
subject to an evaluation of the agricultural impact prior to being included in
the DOC capital budget. As part of this assessment, the DOC will consider the
suitability of these lands for needs identified in DOC's internal policy plan
Outdoor Recreation in Illinois: The 1983 Policy Plan, and subsequent action
plans.
3. New
Facilities Acquisition
The DOC also
acquires land for new facilities. Selection of a specific site for a new
recreation or conservation area, other than a natural area, will be based upon
resource capability, recreational potential, locational desirability,
acquisition and development costs, environmental impact, and agricultural
impacts, both existing and future. Selection of a preferred location among
various alternatives will be based upon the above suitability criteria to
determine which site can best meet the goals of the project while at the same
time minimizing impacts to agriculture.
4. Linear
Corridor Acquisition
Purchase of
land for long-distance linear corridors is another special type of DOC
acquisition. Emphasis will be given to acquiring land which connects points of
scenic, natural, cultural or recreational interest and is not Class I, II and
III land. In cases where the most direct routes between points of interest
would take agricultural land out of production, alternative routes will be
examined. Specific criteria for acquisition of land for long distance trails
are addressed in the Long Distance Trails Section (pp. 45 and 46), of
"Outdoor Recreation in Illinois: The 1983 Policy Plan."
5. Wildlife
Habitat Acquisition
A major
component of DOC's acquisition program is habitat acquisition, which is
intended to address the paramount threat to Illinois' wildlife today – loss of
habitat, both in quantity and in quality. During the last century, most of the
natural land in the private sector has been converted to other uses at the
expense of the wildlife resource base. This problem has now reached crisis
proportions as documented in the 1985 report of the Illinois Wildlife Habitat
Commission, entitled "The Crisis of Wildlife Habitat in Illinois
Today," which strongly advocates expansion of public lands and better utilization
of them for wildlife conservation. This recommendation was translated into
legislative action in February, 1985 as a major BUILD ILLINOIS initiative and
was funded initially for four million dollars in July, 1985. As of February,
1987, the DOC has secured or programmed for acquisition, some 17,248 acres of
wildlife habitat at sixty-six (66) sites throughout the state.
To use
available dollars wisely, the DOC has developed a set of guidelines to aid in
acquistion decisions, which includes the agricultural impact. Specifically,
habitat acquisition will conform to the DOC's Agricultural Land Preservation
Policy, and the agricultural impact of any potential acquisition will be
weighed in the site-selection process. Other criteria include availability,
habitat quality, vulnerability, manageability, public input, less-than-fee
acquisition potential, recreational potential, and statewide location.
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
Easements
provide the DOC with a valuable mechanism to reduce adverse impacts on
agriculture caused by DOC programs, especially large scale projects. Easements
are of great benefit because they can be used to allow the continuation of
agricultural practices while preventing developments which may have adverse
impacts on DOC properties. Essentially, conservation easements involve the
landowner transferring to the DOC, through sale, donation or will, certain
property rights, such as development rights. Easements can be for a specific
length of time, but generally the purpose of obtaining easements is to protect
the resource from development in perpetuity. Thus, easements can be used to
insure continued agricultural use of the land.
The DOC will
strongly consider obtaining easements in cases where the primary purposes of
protecting parcels of land are to prevent encroaching development, preserve the
visual integrity of the site, maintain an existing land use or provide buffer.
The potential benefits to the DOC include reduced costs and management
responsibilities, while at the same time protecting the critical resource which
otherwise would have required the purchase of fee-simple title. Although an
easement can be tailored to specifically accommodate the desires of both the
DOC and the land-owner, the landowner's cooperation is necessary. If a landowner
is not willing to enter into an easement agreement, a fee-simple acquisition
will then be considered.
Less-than-fee-simple
acquisition could also be used to allow access across private lands for
recreational purposes. As part of the DOC's trails planning process, the use
of easements for providing long-distance trail opportunities will be
addressed. The use of easements will also be explored in providing
recreational use of stream corridors.
CONSERVATION LEASES
The DOC
utilizes conservation leases on both a landlord and tenant basis when
appropriate. Specifically, the DOC lets agricultural leases on DOC lands to
private parties to produce food and cover for wildlife, sometimes on an interim
basis following acquisition and pending development. In some cases, larger
acreages are acquired than were originally proposed due to ownership patterns
and individual landowner's desires. In such an instance, a lease-back will be
considered to maintain the agricultural use of the additional property. As a
stipulation of any farm lease, the DOC requires proper soil conservation
techniques including, but not limited to, the use of conservation tillage,
limited spring plowing, and crop rotation in order to protect the land and
control erosion.
As an
alternative to outright purchase, the DOC will also consider entering into a
long-term lease where compatible with site objectives.
PROJECT REVIEW
A major
responsibility of the DOC is to review construction projects proposed by
federal, state and local governments, as well as private interests, to insure
projects are constructed in a manner which is least damaging to Illinois'
natural, cultural and recreational resources. As part of this function, the
DOC reviews Corps of Engineers Section 10 and Section 404 permits; Soil
Conservation Service projects; Department of Transportation, Division of Water
Resources permits; National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System permits;
state, federal and local highway projects; mining permits; utility power plant
sitting proposals; transmission corridor location studies; environmental
assessment reports; and Environmental Impact Statements. In addition to
statutory charges, the DOC has been granted additional review responsibilities
through federal laws such as the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (P.L.
85-624, as amended), Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-670),
Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-87), and
the National Environmental Policy Act (P.L. 91-190).
In reviewing
projects, the DOC evaluates effects upon wildlife habitat, aquatic habitat,
forest resources, endangered and threatened species, natural areas,
recreational resources, cultural and archaeological sites and other natural
lands and waters which would be affected by the project. The DOC's major
objective is to insure that project sponsors minimize and mitigate impacts upon
Illinois' natural, cultural and recreational resources. During its review, the
DOC will assess the various project impacts and make comments and
recommendations to the permitting agency or project sponsor to insure the
project is constructed in an environmentally sound manner. Specific procedures
for internal review of construction projects are set forth in the DOC Policies
and Procedures Manual.
GRANTS
Two major grant
programs, the federal Land & Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) program and
state-financed Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development (OSLAD) program,
are administered by the DOC. Both provide funding assistance for acquisition
and development of public outdoor recreation areas. Monies for the LWCF
program are appropriated by Congress on an annual basis to Illinois through the
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. A portion of that
money is/may be used for DOC outdoor recreation acquisition, development and
planning projects. The remainder is distributed on a competitive basis to
local units of government, providing up to 50% reimbursement, on approved
outdoor recreation acquisition and development projects. The OSLAD program
provides funding assistance solely to local units of government, and also allows
for up to 50% reimbursement on approved acquisition and development projects
for public outdoor recreation areas. Typically, LWCF and OSLAD projects at the
local level are situated within or contiguous to municipalities.
The LWCF and
OSLAD programs are administered similarly by DOC per the rules set forth in 17
of the Ill. Adm. Code 3025 and 3030, and in accordance with the Land and Water
Conservation Fund Act of 1965, as amended (78 Stat. 897) and the Illinois Open
Space Lands Acquisition and Development Act (Ill. Rev. Stat 1985, ch. 85, pars.
2101 et seq.). In approving LWCF and OSLAD grants, the DOC will encourage
project sponsors to minimize acquisition of productive farmland and will
promote projects which are within a municipality, constitute contiguous
development and are consistent with both DOC plans and local land use plans.
LANDOWNER ASSISTANCE
The DOC
administers several programs to assist landowners in wise management of their
land. These programs involve advising landowners of conservation practices
which in turn benefit agriculture, e.g., reducing erosion and controlling
noxious weeds. A brief description of each follows.
1. Acres for Wildlife
This program
was established to encourage landowners to set aside part of their property on
a yearly basis to provide habitat for wildlife. The program is designed to
protect existing wildlife cover, although some modification or manipulation of
the existing cover may occur. Maintaining the land as habitat may help control
water run-off, thus benefiting adjacent agricultural land.
2. Roadsides
for Wildlife
This program
involves seeding roadsides, as well as waterways on private lands, to provide
habitat for wildlife. Benefits to agriculture include control of erosion and
noxious weeds.
3. Private
Land Habitat Management Program
Through this
program, the DOC provides technical assistance to private landowners in
managing their land to provide wildlife habitat. Soil and water conservation
are important secondary benefits. Permanent plantings of shrubs, trees, food
patches and grass/legumes are usually confined to non-agricultural or very
marginal lands.
Technical
support is also provided to landowners participating in federal farm programs
which retire cropland from production.
4. Reforestation
And Technical Assistance
The DOC
provides technical assistance to landowners on forest conservation practices.
Assistance comprises management advice for the protection, enhancement and
utilization of existing forest lands, and reforestation, including a limited
supply of tree and shrub seedlings. Usually reforestation is encouraged on
marginal lands not suitable for row crops. Many seedlings are also sold to
urban and suburban landowners who own small acreages. Agricultural benefits of
this program include soil erosion control, production of forest resources,
windbreaks, and soil and water conservation.
SUMMARY
It will
continue to be the responsibility of the DOC to protect the state's natural,
cultural and recreational resources. Toward this end, the DOC will continue to
operate a system of parks, recreation, and conservation areas, thus maintaining
lands in their natural condition. Furthermore, the DOC will continue to carry
out land management practices on these properties to protect the natural
resources.
The DOC
recognizes that the land is one of Illinois' most valuable natural resources
and shares the concern for protecting it from adverse effects. The DOC will
cooperate in the effort of the State of Illinois to minimize the conversion of
land, valued for its agricultural products, to non-agricultural uses.
(May, 1987; revised)
Illinois
Department of Conservation –
Illinois
Department of Agriculture
Cooperative
Working Agreement
This Cooperative Working
Agreement between the Department of Conservation (DOC) and the Department of
Agriculture (DOA) is part of the DOC Agricultural Land Preservation Policy,
adopted to reduce the irreversible conversion of Illinois' agricultural land.
The DOC and the DOA agree to the following:
I. The DOC will notify the DOA of all proposed land acquisition
when the preliminary request is submitted to the Bureau of the Budget for
consideration and DOC will describe the purpose of each applicable project.
Additionally, the DOC will provide the required project information to DOA as
specified in 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A: Exhibit B, "Project
Proposal Information Requirements." The DOC will also justify the
necessity for purchasing farmland, and indicate how the proposed acquisition is
consistent with DOC's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy.
The DOC and DOA recognize that certain types of DOC land acquisition involve
special situations that should be treated as such. These are enumerated below
(see II - VIII). It will be the responsibility of the DOC to identify these
special types of acquisition in the project information submitted to DOA.
II. The DOC will continue its program to acquire and protect
natural areas identified by the Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, the
comprehensive statewide survey which documented the location of relatively
undisturbed natural communities, endangered species habitats, geologic areas,
and other categories of natural areas. Areas proposed for acquisition may also
include additional lands that meet the Inventory criteria, but were not
discovered during the initial survey. (The Inventory is a dynamic data base,
updated by adding qualifying areas and deleting those that no longer meet the
criteria for inclusion.) The DOA recognizes the significance of preserving the
few natural areas remaining in the State and supports the DOC's efforts to
acquire Inventory areas.
Therefore, the DOA will not conduct a Study of Agricultural Impacts,
regardless of the size of the inventoried natural area. Acquisition of any
additional land surrounding the natural area will follow the guidelines
specified in the DOC's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy and will be
subject to DOA's Study of Agricultural Impacts.
III. The DOC purchases some agricultural land specifically to
maintain its agricultural use. These farming operations are important in
producing food and cover for wildlife. Some modifications of farming practices
may occur, however, because lands being farmed under DOC ownership and
management are subject to proper land management including, but not limited to,
conservation tillage, limited spring plowing and crop rotation.
The DOC also purchases agricultural land to correct adjacent land
management practices which are damaging the resources on DOC properties, e.g.,
watershed pollution. The DOA recognizes the value and necessity of this type
of stewardship and wise land management practices. The DOC will notify the DOA
of proposed projects of this type and explain the intent and necessity of
acquisition and the agricultural impact resulting from DOC acquisition of the
property. The DOA will determine whether an Agricultural Impact Study is
needed for such acquisitions on a case-by-case basis.
IV. Much of the DOC's land acquisition involves completing
previously programmed and initiated acquisition projects. The DOA recognizes
the need for contiguous development of DOC properties. Therefore, acquisition
of inholdings, regardless of size, will not be subject to the Agriculture
Impact Study. For the purpose of this agreement, an inholding is defined as
land which is surrounded at least on three sides by DOC ownership.
Proposed acquisition of landlocked parcels, which are dependent upon
access through DOC land, shall be given special consideration by the DOA when
such access conflicts with management goals for the adjoining DOC land.
V. The DOA will not perform a Study of Agricultural Impacts for
DOC projects encompassing 10 acres or less of land. All areas proposed for
acquisition by the DOC regardless of size, however, will follow the land
acquisition policies set forth in the DOC Agricultural Land Preservation
Policy.
VI. The DOA will not perform a Study of Agricultural Impacts on
projects located within municipalities.
VII. In the event that acquisition of a parcel is not completed
during the fiscal year for which it is programmed, the scope of the project
does not change with respect to the land acquisition, and a review and/or
Agricultural Impact Study has been completed, it shall not be subject to
further review nor the Agricultural Impact Study process in subsequent years.
VIII. Land acquired by gift, administrative transfer, conservation
easement, or conservation lease, shall be exempt from the Agricultural Impact
Study process.
IX. It is imperative that the DOC's land acquisition program
proceed on schedule during each fiscal year. Accordingly, in the event the DOA
has not completed its agricultural impact review of a DOC project site within
30 days of notification, the DOC may proceed with acquisition unhampered.
However, the 30 day review time frame will not commence until the DOA has
received the required project information. If problems arise, the DOA may
request, in writing, a 15 day extension. Furthermore, DOC will not release
information to the general public relative to a final decision on a project
site(s) which falls under the DOA's purview until the required Study of
Agricultural Impacts has been completed.
X. If a project is not in compliance with DOC's Agricultural Land
Preservation Policy and/or Cooperative Working Agreement and a compromise
cannot be reached, the DOA shall invoke the Conflict Resolution Process (8 Ill.
Adm. Code 700.Appendix A: Exhibit C).
XI. The DOC and the DOA will take all possible measures to insure
that procedures relating to the implementation of this Agreement will remain
confidential.
XII. This Cooperative Working Agreement and the associated
Agricultural Land Preservation Policy shall be the governing document for the
DOC and shall not be preempted in whole nor in part by any other agency
agreement.
(May, 1987; revised)
(Source: Exhibit A renumbered from Appendix D and amended at 11 Ill.
Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX D ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Section 700.APPENDIX D
Illinois Department of Conservation
Section 700.EXHIBIT B Illinois
State Statutes Governing the Department of Conservation
Following is a list of the major
state statutes which delineate roles and responsibilities of the DOC.
1. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat.
1985, ch. 8, pars. 331 et seq.)
2. Fish Code of 1971 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 56, pars. 1.1 et
seq.)
3. Game Code of 1971 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 61, pars. 1.1 et
seq.)
4. Boat Registration and Safety Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch.
95½, pars. 311-1 et seq.)
5. Snowmobile Registration and Safety Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985,
ch. 95½, par. 601-1 et seq.)
6. AN ACT in relation to State forests, operation of forest tree
nurseries, and providing penalties in connection therewith (Ill. Rev. Stat.
1985, ch. 96½, pars. 5901 et seq.)
7. AN ACT in relation to the acquisition, control, maintenance,
improvement and protection of State parks (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 105, pars.
465 et seq.)
8. Civil Administrative Code of Illinois (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985,
ch. 127, pars. 63a et seq.)
(Source: Exhibit B renumbered from Exhibit A and amended at 11 Ill. Reg.
18569, effective November 2, 1987)
Section 700.APPENDIX E Department of Commerce and Community Affairs' Farmland Preservation Policy and Cooperative Agreement
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX E DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS' FARMLAND PRESERVATION POLICY AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX E Department
of Commerce and Community Affairs' Farmland Preservation Policy and Cooperative
Agreement
PREFACE
On July 22, 1980, Governor James
R. Thompson signed an Executive Order entitled "Preservation of Illinois
Farmland" which required the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs
and other state agencies develop an agricultural land preservation policy. In
response to that Order, the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs has
prepared the following policy document.
POLICY
It is the policy of the
Department of Commerce and Community Affairs to support and promote the
preservation of Illinois farmland.
BACKGROUND
The Department of Commerce and
Community Affairs (DCCA) was established in 1979 to promote community and
economic development in Illinois. DCCA serves as the central source of
information and assistance for businesses and local governments in order to:
Strengthen the state's economy
Strengthen local government leadership
Increase employment opportunities
The primary mission of the
Department is to ensure economic stability, enhance business prosperity,
increase employment and employment opportunities, and promote the increased
capabilities of local governments and other public entities to achieve balanced
development of economic, human and natural resources.
In fulfilling its goals, DCCA
aids the public and private sectors. DCCA does not engage in capital
development projects. The department assists communities and private companies
engaged in development activities. By promoting economic and community development
DCCA may indirectly contribute to the conversion problem. DCCA's farmland
policy is intended to mitigate the department's indirect role in the conversion
process, and make achievement of development goals compatible with established
state policy regarding farmland preservation.
IMPACT
OF AGENCY ACTIVITIES
A. Marketing
DCCA
marketing programs are designed to encourage and promote the continuing
internal economic development of Illinois, and to sell Illinois around the
world to business leaders and tourists. Making business leaders in Illinois
and throughout the world more aware of the state's business services and
resources; increasing the visibility of the state's tourist attractions
worldwide; and improving the self-image of Illinois and its communities are the
primary objectives of DCCA marketing programs and services. Illinois'
strengths as a major business state are communicated within the state and
around the world through advertising campaigns; publications; films, video
tapes and multi-image presentations; trade shows and missions; marketing
alliances such as Illinois, Inc.; exhibits; telemarketing campaigns; and
personal contact among business leaders and DCCA marketing representatives.
Illinois tourist attractions are promoted through similar means with additional
emphasis on consumer-oriented marketing activities targeted at business and
pleasure travelers. Important components of the department's marketing programs
and services help individual communities throughout Illinois improve and
promote their business and community resources and tourist attractions. Making
Illinois a more profitable and productive home for business, and providing
specific location and expansion services to individual firms are the objectives
of an array of DCCA activities.
In
cooperation with municipal authorities and realtors, data on available
industrial sites and buildings throughout Illinois are computerized for a quick
and precise match-up to a firm's specific location requirements. Typical of
information available is rail access, square feet, transportation and utility
service. Approximately 300 community profiles provide industrial clients
seeking to expand or relocate with essential information on a particular
community.
No overall
figures are available on the amount of farmland converted as a result of
Marketing's development activities. However, since the majority of industrial
prospects look for existing buildings, the loss of farmland due to development
projects may be minimal.
B. Program Administration
To ensure
employment for its citizens and to maintain an adequate tax base for the
funding of local government services and operations, a community must strive to
encourage the growth of its existing businesses and to attract new firms. Many
DCCA programs are designed to help Illinois communities maintain and improve
their business climates and services in both direct and indirect ways. For
example, some DCCA community development programs provide direct grants to
units of local government to finance the expansion or location of specific
firms. Other programs help local government improve their general environment
for the benefit of both business and residents and several programs subsidize
individual households in a community. Whatever their specific purpose or
direct beneficiary, all DCCA community development programs are designed to
make Illinois cities and towns the best homes in America for both people and
business.
DCCA provides
several types of programs and services to help establish a balance between the
demand and supply of skilled labor in Illinois communities. Some programs and
services directly subsidize the employment training costs for specific
businesses, while others provide funds to help finance community-wide employment
training programs designed to provide income-eligible individuals with locally
marketable job skills. Other special programs focus on the training and
employment needs of targeted groups such as homemakers, youth and individuals
who have recently lost their jobs as the result of business closures due to
economic difficulties or technological advances.
Businesses,
units of local government, community organizations and individuals receive
financial assistance directly from DCCA to promote the overall economic
development of Illinois. Financial assistance for business goes directly to
firms from DCCA or may be passed through units of local government. Financial
assistance to units of local government may be used to fund the expansion and
location of specific firms, or may be used to improve the overall community
environment for the benefit of both business and people, and to finance
business-related services. Financial assistance to not-for-profit community
organizations is passed through to eligible individuals and households, or may
be used by the organizations to directly fund activities and projects of
general benefits to the community or a targeted population. Financial
assistance programs to individuals and households are designed to improve and maintain
the immediate living environment of citizens while reducing the demand for such
assistance on units of local government.
Through its
planning and technical assistance activities, the Program Administration
promotes orderly and efficient community growth, an important element in
farmland preservation. Program Administration typically does not promote
farmland conversions, and staff can often alert communities and local
governments to the problems associated with farmland conversion.
IMPACT MITIGATION
The Department of Commerce and
Community Affairs can best promote farmland preservation by serving in an
educational and informational role. The Department can build a concern for
farmland preservation into its programs by:
1. DCCA's industrial location programs will provide information
to prospective firms on the state policy regarding farmland preservation, and
its relationship to federal aid. DCCA will encourage location near existing
development or development consistent with an overall community growth strategy
or plan.
2. To facilitate the early identification of projects with
potential agricultural impacts, indication of soil quality will be made in
DCCA's industrial site location information. The Illinois Department of
Agriculture (DOA) will assist with this soil assessment.
3. DCCA will consult with DOA regarding private agricultural
conversion. Within the constraints of prospect confidentiality, DCCA will
notify DOA of the locating decisions of businesses and industries and will
request an Agricultural Impact Statement be compiled for locations further than
1½ miles from the authority of a municipality.
4. DCCA will educate communities on the benefits of farmland
preservation. When practical, grantors will use the state policy of farmland
preservation among the grant selection criteria.
(1981; revised)
COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT
This Cooperative Agreement
between the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs and the Department of
Agriculture is part of the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs'
Farmland Preservation Policy, adopted to reduce the conversion of Illinois'
agricultural lands. The Department of Commerce and Community Affairs and the
Department of Agriculture agree to the following:
I. The Department of Commerce and Community Affairs will inform
the prospective firm of the State of Illinois' commitment to the preservation
of prime agricultural land and encourage the firm to seek a location that
conforms with existing land use practices and plans by providing copies of the
Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 5, pars. 1301 et seq.).
II. The Department of Commerce and Community Affairs will provide
the Department of Agriculture with all information concerning industrial sites
currently held in the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs' data base.
The Department of Agriculture will identify those sites which are classified as
"prime agricultural." The Department of Commerce and Community
Affairs will make adjustments in its data base to indicate those sites as
identified. The Department of Commerce and Community Affairs will provide a
copy of Executive Order 80-4 to the prospective firm in all instances where a
"prime agricultural" site is under consideration by the firm.
III. In instances where a prospective firm identifies a "prime
agricultural" site as the future location of its facility and the site is
greater than 10 acres and is not within the 1½ mile planning jurisdiction of a
community, or properly zoned and controlled or inconsistent with local plans,
the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs will contact the Department of
Agriculture. The Department of Agriculture will decide whether the preparation
of an Agricultural Impact Statement is appropriate. During the preparation of
the A.I.S. and related D.O.A. comments on the use of state inducements for
business expansion on that site DCCA will delay its firm offers of assistance
in order to allow time for any needed conflict resolution to occur as referred
in paragraph VII.
IV. The Department of Commerce and Community Affairs' housing
technical assistance staff will provide information to housing authorities and
developers concerning Executive Order 80-4.
Department of Agriculture
Responsibilities
V. The Department of Agriculture will complete the Agricultural
Impact Statement in the time specified by the Department of Commerce and
Community Affairs. Such time will be not less than 15 days and not longer than
45 days.
VI. The Department of Agriculture will take all possible measures
in accordance with The Freedom of Information Act (Supp. to Ill. Rev. Stat.
1983, ch. 116, pars. 201 et seq.) to insure that private sector and/or
individual matters relating to the implementation of this Agreement will remain
confidential.
VII. The Department of Agriculture shall follow the conflict
resolution process when disputes arise between the the two Departments. This
process shall require the Department of Agriculture to advise the Director of
the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, of the conflict as seen by
D.O.A. If resolution is not obtained within 14 business days each agency shall
present its position to its Program Liaison in the Governor's Office.
VIII. This Cooperative Agreement and the associated Farmland
Preservation Policy shall be the governing document for the Department of
Commerce and Community Affairs and shall not be preempted in whole or in part
by any other agency's agreement.
(February, 1982; revised)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX F DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES' AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX F Department
of Energy and Natural Resources' Agricultural Land Preservation Policy
Statement and Cooperative Working Agreement
INTRODUCTION
The Department of Energy and
Natural Resources' (ENR) Agricultural Land Preservation Policy has been
prepared in response to the Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987,
ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.). The Act calls for the preparation of an Agricultural
Land Preservation Policy which shall include:
1. an analysis of the impact on agricultural land conversions
caused by state agency programs, regulations, procedures and operations;
2. measures that can be implemented by each agency which will
mitigate conversions to the maximum extent practicable;
3. provisions for minimizing agricultural land conversion as
defined in Section 700.10.
ENR, as one of the agencies
named in the Farmland Preservation Act, has developed the following policy in
support of the Act. This approach ensures that agricultural preservation is
viewed in the context of the State's total resources.
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT
ENR recognizes the need to
ensure that its actions do not unnecessarily encourage the conversion of farmland
to non-farm uses when there are viable alternatives available which are less
destructive to Illinois' agricultural lands. ENR will help protect the state's
agricultural land from irreversible conversion to uses which result in its loss
as an environmental or essential food production resource, however, ENR also
recognizes that Illinois has other natural and cultural resources which deserve
equal consideration and which play an important role in the state's economy,
environment and heritage.
BACKGROUND
ENR has the duty to investigate
practical problems, implement studies, conduct research and provide assistance,
information and data relating to the technology and administration of
environmental protection; energy; the natural history, entomology, zoology and
botany of Illinois; the geology and natural resources of Illinois; the water
resources and weather of Illinois; and the archaeological and cultural history
of Illinois.
ENR has not been responsible for
any agricultural land conversion in the past three years. Research facilities
of the Geological, Natural History and Water Survey Divisions of the
Department, aside from the central offices in Urbana, Champaign, and Savoy are
generally secured either on a lease basis or through cooperation with other
state agencies or divisions such as the Department of Conservation or the
University of Illinois. The potential for land acquisition of the Surveys is
small because of the availability of these cooperative arrangements, but some
research needs in the future may dictate the purchase of land. Even in those
cases, however, the purchase will probably not lead to the irreversible
conversion of agricultural land.
The State Museum owns or
operates three archaeological sites in Illinois and has the power to accept
grants of property and to hold property for the purpose of preservation,
research or interpretation of significant archaeological and natural phenomena
areas within the state. In practice, most archaeological, historic and natural
areas are acquired by the Illinois Department of Conservation and the Historic
Preservation Agency.
ENR through its responsibilities
in "The Illinois Coal Development Bond Act", grants money to
encourage the development of coal use technologies and for research and
development of other forms of energy such as solar, wind and biomass. The
power of eminent domain can also be used by ENR for the purposes of sitting,
obtaining rights of way or easements for coal resource developers in facility
sitting and coordination with public and private organizations. Although this
program has a potential for causing the conversion of agricultural land, it has
not done so to date.
CONTRIBUTIONS
TO AGRICULTURE
ENR has contributed to the
preservation of agricultural, as well as other natural and cultural resources
of the state, in many ways. Some specific responsibilities ENR has, which
relate to these resources, are:
* to investigate and study the natural resources of the state
and prepare printed reports and furnish information fundamental to the
conservation and development of natural resources.
* to cooperate with and advise departments having administrative
powers and duties relating to the natural resources of the state.
* to investigate all insects dangerous or injurious to
agricultural or horticultural plants, crops and livestock.
* to act as the central data repository and research coordinator
for the state in matters related to water resources.
* in the conduct of economic impact studies on rules and
regulations of the Pollution Control Board to include an evaluation of the
economic impact on Illinois agriculture.
* to carry out educational efforts in cooperation with other state
agencies on natural resource and energy issues. ENR co-sponsored the two
Governor's Conference on the Preservation of Agricultural Lands as part of this
function. Educational aids directed at agriculture are also produced by the
Surveys.
* to offer demonstration and assistance programs for alternative
energy resources. Alcohol, gasohol and solar programs, projects and assistance
have directly contributed to increasing the viability of the agricultural
sector in Illinois.
IMPACT MITIGATION POLICIES
State
Surveys
1. ENR will attempt to avoid irreversible conversion of
agricultural land when the purchase of land is necessary to carry out Survey
research functions. If research needs dictate that the Surveys purchase land, any
purchases over ten (10) acres of agricultural land will be reviewed by an ENR
committee in order to determine whether other alternatives exist. The
committee will make a report of its finding and forward it to the Department of
Agriculture (DOA). An exception to this would be the acquisition of an
agricultural research farm. This potential case as well as other research
needs for land is not expected to result in irreversible conversion.
Illinois State Museum
2. The Illinois State Museum will only purchase those sites of
National Register quality for the purpose of preserving, studying and
interpreting archaeological and natural phenomena. While this may mean that in
the future some agricultural land may be removed from production, the application
of criteria (36 CFR 60 (1983)) restricting acquisition to National Register
quality sites will minimize adverse impacts to agriculture and help preserve
the other natural or cultural resources of exceptional quality.
Illinois Coal Development Bond Act
3. ENR, in carrying out its responsibilities under this Act, will
attempt to minimize any adverse impacts on agriculture. For state funded
projects converting more than ten (10) acres of agricultural land, ENR will
evaluate the potential adverse impacts on Illinois agriculture in accordance
with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A, EXHIBIT B, "Project Proposal
Information Requirements," as well as other Illinois natural and cultural
resources within the context of the state's social, economic and environmental
goals based on such factors as the following: (a) decrease in future food
production capabilities; (b) increase in soil erosion; (c) deterioration or
reduction of water quality and groundwater supplies; and (d) other
environmental factors related to the particular project that diminishes
Illinois' cropland base or otherwise adversely impacts Illinois' agricultural
lands. The information identified above and the alternative strategies for
mitigation of adverse impacts shall be provided to the DOA.
When assistance
is provided to sponsors of non-state funded projects for energy development,
the ENR will provide a copy of the ENR Agricultural Land Preservation Policy
Statement and the Cooperative Working Agreement to the sponsor at the earliest
possible date.
(October, 1988; revised)
Department
of Energy and Natural Resources – Department
of
Agriculture Cooperative Working Agreement
The Illinois Department of
Energy and Natural Resources (ENR) and the Illinois Department of Agriculture
(DOA) agree to the following:
1. ENR shall notify the DOA in writing of all state-funded
capital projects where it would be purchasing parcels of agricultural land of
more than ten (10) acres. No notification is required if a project is located
within a municipal boundary or within a one and one-half mile planning area of
a comprehensive plan, if one exists, of a municipality. The DOA shall be notified
if land is purchased by the three scientific surveys (Geological, Natural
History and Water Survey) and the Illinois State Museum, however, land
purchased by the three scientific surveys and the State Museum shall not be
subject to the DOA's Study of Agricultural Impacts. For state funded capital
projects requiring parcels of agricultural land of more than ten (10) acres,
ENR will provide information in accordance with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX
A, EXHIBIT B, "Project Proposal Information Requirements," to the DOA
as necessary to make a determination of conflicts with state policy.
2. The opportunity shall be provided to the DOA to review
projects funded through the Illinois Coal Development Bond Act before a
contract is entered into with the applicant. DOA shall not publicize or
circulate its comments beyond the DOA, ENR, and the Governor's Office.
3. The DOA shall complete its Study of Agricultural Impacts
within a 30-day period after receiving the required information from the ENR in
accordance with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.APPENDIX A, EXHIBIT B. The DOA shall
follow the guidelines for review of the project proposals contained in its
Agricultural Land Preservation Policy when conducting its review. Furthermore,
ENR will not release information to the general public relative to a final
decision on a project site(s) which falls under the DOA's purview until the
official Study of Agricultural Impacts has been completed.
4. ENR shall follow the mitigation procedures outlined in its
Agricultural Land Preservation Policy. The DOA shall be notified in writing of
the purchase of any agricultural research farms.
5. ENR shall notify the DOA of any agricultural land donated to
the agency. Donated land shall not be subject to DOA review.
6. ENR shall notify the DOA in writing of all proposed changes in
policies and procedures that alter the existing agreement. If deemed necessary
by both agencies, a new agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with the
Act and these rules.
7. This Cooperative Working Agreement, ENR's Agricultural Land
Preservation Policy and the Farmland Preservation Act shall be the governing
documents for ENR's farmland preservation policies.
(October 1988; revised)
(Source: Amended at 13 Ill. Reg. 10489, effective June 16, 1989)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX G ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX G Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy
Statement and Cooperative Working Agreement
PREFACE
On August 19, 1982, Governor
James R. Thompson signed into law the Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev.
Stat. 1987, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.), which required the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to develop an agricultural land
preservation policy statement and cooperative working agreement. The following
policy statement and working agreement are submitted in accordance with the
Act.
POLICY
STATEMENT
The Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency recognizes the need to maintain the quality of the State's
productive agricultural land and also to protect this valuable resource from
permanent conversion to non-agricultural uses. It shall be the policy of the
Agency in its programs and operations to preserve Illinois farmland, through
procedures consistent with State and Federal laws.
ANALYSIS
OF IMPACT
The Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency has the responsibility to protect public health, welfare and
quality of life in Illinois by protecting the environment. The Agency monitors
environmental pollutants, enforces pollution control regulations, carries out
permit programs to control certain pollution related activities, and
administers grants for planning and construction of wastewater treatment
facilities.
IEPA's programs and operations
do not involve land acquisition for capital development; therefore, the Agency
will not directly cause conversion of agricultural lands. Indirect and
secondary impacts may occur, however, through administration of permits,
grants, and regulatory programs.
Permits
The four program Divisions of
IEPA (Air Pollution Control, Water Pollution Control, Public Water Supplies,
and Land/Noise Pollution Control) issue permits for the construction and
operation of pollution control facilities, water treatment works, and
enterprises which are potential sources of pollution. Additionally, the Agency
issues authorizations or certifications to federal agencies for their action on
applications for permits, licenses and other forms of federal approval of
proposed activities.
The Agency's permit programs and
related Federal programs can affect farmland as follows:
a. Through decisions on facility planning areas which
consequently affect the location of new sewage treatment plants/interceptors
and public water supply facilities/distribution systems.
b. Through construction permit decisions for new pollution
control facilities which may be built at locations which could affect farmland.
c. Through decisions on the sitting of solid waste facilities.
d. Through decisions on other pollution source controls for mine
related pollution and agricultural related pollution.
e. Through reviews of environmental impact statements.
Any Agency program activity
which is responsible to Federal laws must comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act and USEPA policy on farmland preservation. The USEPA
policy, September 8, 1978, is consistent with policies of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture and the Council on Environmental Quality. It proclaims,
"It is EPA's policy to protect, through the administration and
implementation of its programs and regulations, the nation's environmentally
significant agricultural land from irreversible conversion to uses which result
in its loss as an environmental or essential food production resource."
However, Agency permit denials, absent state law, cannot be predicated in any
instance solely on the taking of prime farmland out of production. Therefore,
information on farmland for permit determinations is limited to the facts
relating to pollution control attributes of the source. In the event a
proposed activity is inconsistent with existing state law (i.e., Agricultural
Areas Conservation and Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 5, par. 1001
et seq.)), permits must be denied by the Agency.
Grants
The direct impact of state and
federal wastewater treatment works construction grants programs administered by
the Agency upon land conversion is generally insignificant. The major
wastewater construction grant programs are the state Build Illinois Program and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency program authorized under Section 201
of the Federal Clean Water Act.
In general, land requirements
for sitting of grant eligible pollution control facilities are small and are
responsive to the existing and near term needs of urban centers. However, the
secondary effects of wastewater treatment provisions to accommodate anticipated
future urban growth upon land conversion can be significant.
Future growth and anticipated
wastewater treatment needs are currently limited to projected population levels
established by the Illinois Bureau of the Budget forecasts and are limited to
service within established facility planning areas (FPA). The service areas
for growth are established by local governments consistent with their planned
growth patterns and density into adjacent land areas. The planning
requirements which must be met coupled with grant eligibility limitations on
transport systems discourage leap frog development.
Although the impact of
urbanization upon farmland conversion is significant, the wastewater grant
programs merely help provide for adequate pollution control resulting from
local decision making and population distribution.
All federal wastewater
construction grants are required to protect environmentally significant
agricultural lands from irreversible conversion to uses which result in its
loss as an environmental or essential food production resource. As part of the
decision making process for the planning, design and construction of
interceptors and treatment facilities, farmland protection is considered.
USEPA procedures are defined in regulations developed pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act and the USEPA policy on farmland protection. An
additional directive to minimize farmland conversion is provided to the USEPA
in the federal Farmland Protection Policy Act (7 U.S.C. 4201 et seq.).
Adequate consideration and mitigation are also an integral part of the State
wastewater construction grant program which is operated consistent with the
USEPA program.
Rules and Regulations
Regulatory programs are
administered by each Division as prescribed by the Illinois Pollution Control Board's
Rules and Regulations (35 Ill. Adm. Code: Subtitles A through H). Enforcement
of the regulations may require application of pollution control techniques that
are costly or discouraging to some agricultural operations. This is most
evident where urban encroachment upon existing agricultural areas is occurring.
From a broader perspective the
regulatory programs are supportive of farmland preservation. Specific
agricultural exemptions are incorporated in the air, solid waste, and noise
pollution regulations (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 111½, par. 21(f), and 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 237.120(a), 722.151, 809.211, 901.107(a) and (c), and
902.140(a)(4)). Enforcement of the regulations protects and enhances the
quality of Illinois' land, water, and air resources which are indispensible to
a productive agricultural industry.
MITIGATION
PROCEDURES
Agency program activities shall
continue to be responsive to the Farmland Preservation Act. Agricultural land
protection efforts shall be supported through intergovernmental coordination
and review consistent with State and Federal laws. Reasonable opportunities
for review and comment on Agency actions will be afforded consistent with
schedules for Agency decisions prescribed by law, regulation, or Agency
policy. Where applicable, Agency administrative procedures on regulatory and
programmatic functions shall be administered in a manner which is consistent
with the Farmland Preservation Act. Protection of agricultural lands shall be
carried out in the following Agency actions:
A. The Agency will continue to participate in an inter-agency
committee to carry out the objectives of land preservation.
B. Consideration of impacts on agricultural land shall be made
within the process of developing new or revised regulations or administrative
procedures. In particular, the conversion of farmland shall be evaluated by
the Agency in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4231 et seq.) in considering revisions to boundaries of facility planning areas
designated in accordance with the Clean Water Act (P.L. 95-217, as amended).
Agency evaluation shall include consideration of comments from IDOA.
C. The Agency will provide the Illinois Department of Agriculture
(IDOA) wastewater permit application information for purposes of administering
the Farmland Preservation Act.
D. In conjunction with Agency approval of an FPA/construction grant
(35 Ill. Adm. Code 362 and 363), potential farmland conversion will be
considered in the decision making process.
E. Wastewater treatment works construction grant applicants will
be required to submit information for the State Clearinghouse Review.
F. Agency programmatic activities shall support and encourage
agricultural land protection programs to achieve a balanced resource management
program.
(May, 1988; revised)
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
– Illinois Department of
Agriculture Cooperative Working
Agreement
A. The IEPA shall provide official notification to the IDOA on a
developing facility plan if the facility plan necessitates the creation of a
new FPA or an expansion of an approved FPA; however, no notice shall be
required for any activity occurring within an approved FPA. An official
notification will include the following information when available from the
project applicant:
1. Project description;
2. Map indicating general project location in the county;
3. The most current soil survey map showing precise project
boundaries;
4. Identification of all land classes (I-VIII) lying within
project boundaries and the number of acres contained within each land class;
5. Identification of zoning and whether the project is in
compliance with a comprehensive plan regulating the project area, if
applicable;
6. Identification of land use within project area and of that
land contiguous to it;
7. The project proposal discussing how the size and location of
the proposed project shall meet and not exceed the goals of the project thereby
avoiding unnecessary farmland conversion;
8. Explanation of project location;
9. Name, address and telephone number of individual who provided
the above information.
The IDOA
will initiate its Study of Agricultural Impacts upon receiving the notification
and will complete the study in accordance with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A,
Exhibit A, "Time Limitations."
Where applicable, the IEPA will not release information to the general
public relative to a final decision on a project subject to the IDOA's Study of
Agricultural Impacts until the IDOA has completed its study. If a project is
not in compliance with the IEPA's policy statement and/or working agreement and
a compromise cannot be reached, the IDOA shall invoke the Conflict Resolution
Process in accordance with 8 Ill. Adm. Code 700.Appendix A, Exhibit C.
Upon
approval of an FPA subject to this working agreement, IEPA will forward to IDOA
the highest quality map available, delineating the boundaries to the new or
modified FPA.
B. IEPA shall notify IDOA in writing when a petition is submitted
to IEPA invoking the "Procedures and Requirements for Conflict Resolution
in Revising Water Quality Management Plans" (35 Ill. Adm. Code 351). In
turn, IDOA shall notify in writing the appropriate Soil and Water Conservation
District (S&WCD). Notification shall include:
1. Those instances which would revise the Water Quality
Management Plans (WQM) as outlined in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 351.103.
2. Those instances where exceptions to boundaries for FPA's may
be granted without revising the WQM Plan as discussed in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
351.502.
Adequate notification shall be given to enable IDOA and the S&WCD to
review the petition and participate as outlined in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 351.
C. When the project converts or has the potential to convert
farmland, IDOA shall encourage the local S&WCD to participate in providing
inputs into:
1. IEPA regulatory programs covered by P.A. 82-682 (facility
sitting under the Environmental Protection Act); and
2. Issues covered by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 351.
D. IEPA will notify IDOA in writing of permit applications received
for the development and operation of new municipal waste landfills not subject
to the facility sitting provisions of P.A. 82-682.
E. IEPA will notify IDOA in writing of submitted permit
applications that pertain to new facilities or modifications to existing facilities
which are located outside of approved facility planning areas.
F. IEPA shall inform applicants for Wastewater Construction Grants
of existing farmland protection policies and of information required on grant
applications in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Data
required by the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981, P.L. 97-98, shall be
solicited by the applicant from the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. In
cases where these data are not available from SCS, IDOA shall endeavor to
provide the necessary information to the applicant to complete the application
where possible.
G. IDOA shall provide IEPA with current maps of the highest quality
available, delineating the boundaries of all approved Agricultural Areas in the
State.
H. Should either agency experience changes in policy or procedures
which would alter the manner in which the agreement would be executed, the
other agency shall be informed for the purpose of negotiating a new agreement.
(May, 1988; revised)
(Source: Amended at 13 Ill. Reg. 3653, effective March 13, 1989)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX H ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND MINERALS' AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX H Illinois
Department of Mines and Minerals' Agricultural Land Preservation Policy
Statement
In response to
the Farmland Preservation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.),
signed into law by Governor Thompson on August 19, 1982, the Department of
Mines and Minerals hereby submits its Agricultural Land Preservation Policy.
POLICY
It is the
Department's policy, in executing all of its functions, to protect and restore
prime farmland and high capability land to the extent practicable.
DEPARTMENT
PROGRAMS IMPACTING FARMLAND
Unlike many
other state agencies, the Department does not acquire land, nor does it
construct roads or buildings. The Department issues permits to drill wells
(oil, gas and water) and to mine minerals, both coal and aggregate.
The oil, gas
and water activities affect a minimal amount of farmland. The greatest effect
from such activities are brine spills from pipeline breaks leading to saltwater
disposal wells and saline runoff from other unauthorized sources. The
Department issues approximately 2000 permits a year in connection with oil and
gas production and water injection or brine disposal activities. The present
policy is to phase-out all unlined surface evaporation pits which will reduce
the amount of farmland being utilized for this purpose. The Department is
committed to enforcement of this policy through 62 Ill. Adm. Code 240: Subpart
I (Rule IX of the Oil and Gas Rules). Further, 62 Ill. Adm. Code 240.1170
requires that after proper plugging and abandonment, the area shall be cleared
of all refuse material, burnt waste oil, drain and fill all excavations, remove
concrete bases, machinery and material, and level the surface within 6 months
and the area restored as nearly as possible to the condition encountered prior
to when operations commenced.
With respect to
aggregate mines, it is virtually impossible to protect agricultural land
completely because all that remains after mining is a pit, which usually fills
with water. In such a case, there is an inevitable trade-off between
agricultural land, if it is involved, and sand and gravel needed for construction
and maintenance of roads and buildings. It would be difficult to issue permits
only to sites not containing farmland, since sand and gravel deposits do not
necessarily occur in economically recoverable quantities only under
nonagricultural surface lands.
The
Department's activities with respect to surface coal mining have long taken
into account preservation of agricultural land. Stringent cropland reclamation
requirements, such as Rule 1104 (now 62 Ill. Adm. Code 1825.12), have been
imposed in 1976.
These
requirements were the precursors to the prime farmland reclamation requirements
in the Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Federal Act)
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.).
Pursuant to
Section 503 of the Federal Act, Illinois sought and gained approval from the
Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior on June 1, 1982, of a
state administered program granting Illinois exclusive jurisdiction over
surface coal mining operations in Illinois.
Implementation
of this permanent program has resulted in the two-tiered system for restoration
of cropland affected by surface mining activities in Illinois.
The prime
farmland provisions of the program address reclamation of soils meeting the
definition of prime farmland set forth by the Secretary of the United States
Department of Agriculture (7 C.F.R. 657.5 (1987)). While these soils must meet
the federal definition of prime farmland, these soils are generally Class I and
II soils as defined by U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Handbook 210, "Land
Capability Classification" (1973, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.). The prime farmland permitting and performance standard
requirements (62 Ill. Adm. Code 1785.17 and 1823) are all geared toward
ensuring mined prime farmland soils are as productive after mining as they were
prior to mining. Post-mining productivity of reclaimed prime farmland soils is
determined pursuant to the Agricultural Land Productivity Formula (A.L.P.F.)
(62 Ill. Adm. Code 1816. Appendix A) developed by the Illinois Department of
Agriculture. The post-mining land use of prime farmland soils must be
cropland. Incorporations by reference in this Appendix do not include any
later amendments or editions.
The second tier
of the program includes soils exempted from the prime farmland requirements and
all other soils capable of row-crop production. These are all soils included in
Handbook 210, Classes I through III, and those Class IV soils with slopes of
five (5%) percent or less. These soils are treated as high capability soils
and must meet the permitting and performance standards for such soils. The
program requirements for these soils are designed to ensure prime farmland
soils grandfathered after July, 1982, are as equally productive after mining as
before mining and the remaining high capability soils are ninety (90%) percent
as productive after mining. The A.L.P.F. is also utilized to determine
post-mining productivity of these soils.
For prime
farmland soils, the A.L.P.F. requires equivalent post-mining productivity be
demonstrated a minimum of three (3) crop years. One (1) year of the three (3)
years must be at least year five (5) of the minimum five (5) year revegetation
responsibility period. Also, corn must have been the successful crop grown for
at least one (1) year.
The A.L.P.F.
requires high capability soils achieve ninety (90%) percent productivity
post-mining for a minimum of two (2) crop years. One (1) year of the two (2)
years must be at least year five (5) of the five (5) year minimum revegetation
responsibility period. Corn must be grown successfully one (1) year. The
productivity standard for prime farmland grandfathered after July, 1982, is one
hundred (100%) percent. High capability soils reclaimed to hayland or pasture
must meet the above requirements but in tons per acre rather than bushels per
acre.
In addition to
requiring restoration of cropland affected by surface mining activities, the
State's mining program also requires restoration of cropland affected by
subsidence of underground coal mine workings. Cropland affected by subsidence
must be restored to the same capability to produce crops that existed before
subsidence occurred. Generally, subsidence damage to cropland is limited to
interruption of internal or surface drainage that in most cases is restorable
by reestablishment of drainage tile or surface structures.
The Illinois
Department of Agriculture has reviewed permit applications, commenting upon
foreseeable agricultural impacts, since 1978, and will be doing so in the
future on a continuing basis, in accordance with an Interagency Agreement.
Although many
acres of prime farmland and high capability soils are affected by surface coal
mining operations, the effect is only temporary, unlike the effects of road
building, airport and other industrial construction, and urbanization in
general. In fact, many acres of mined land are now producing rowcrops, wheat
and corn being the most successful crop to date. Many more acres have been
returned to pastureland, which also constitutes an agricultural use of land.
It would be
impossible to wholly eliminate the effect of coal mining on agricultural lands
in Illinois because prime farmland and high capability soils occur over most of
the state in varying quantities. However, the Department's coal reclamation
regulations, in addition to the involvement of the Illinois Department of
Agriculture in the review of permit applications, probably represents the most
recognition and protection of agricultural land afforded by any state agency in
Illinois, next to the Department of Agriculture itself.
CONCLUSION
The Department
presently has regulations which provide for protection and restoration of
agricultural lands, and is committed to the spirit and letter of those
regulations. To date, we have had a good working relationship with the
Illinois Department of Agriculture, and we anticipate that this cooperation
will continue.
(June 1987; revised)
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 18569, effective November 2, 1987)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX I ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX I Illinois
Department of Transportation's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement
and Cooperative Working Agreement
PREFACE
The Farmland Preservation Act
(Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.) [505 ILCS 75] requires the
Department of Transportation (DOT) and nine other State agencies to develop a
policy statement specifying the agency's policy toward farmland preservation.
The following statement has been prepared in response to that requirement. A
working agreement has also been prepared to describe the administrative process
that will be used to implement the policy. The Agricultural Land Preservation
Policy prepared in response to Executive Order 80-4, signed by Governor James
R. Thompson on July 22, 1980, will also remain in effect in accordance with
Section 4 of the Farmland Preservation Act.
POLICY
Recognizing that its
transportation objectives must be in concert with the overall goals of the
State, it is the policy of the DOT, in its programs, procedures, and
operations, to preserve Illinois farmland to the extent practicable and
feasible, giving appropriate consideration to the state's social, economic, and
environmental goals.
BACKGROUND/PERSPECTIVE
Highways, rail systems,
airports, and port terminals by their nature, occupy land. The extent that
transportation facilities will occupy today's farmland in the future primarily
will depend on the DOT's programs, safety and operational requirements, and the
degree to which a responsible balance is established among the various
development and preservation interests of the State of Illinois.
With the existence of a
comprehensive and largely complete transportation system in Illinois, the DOT's
major program emphasis is directed toward preservation and rehabilitation of
existing facilities, rather than expansion. Rehabilitation of the system for
full and effective use, however, will require some additional land acquisitions
to satisfy current safety and operational requirements. A limited number of
new or expanded transportation facilities will be required in order to attract
business and industry and improve service and access to Illinois markets.
Expansion efforts must be carefully managed to preserve the agricultural
community while serving the rural areas of the State.
In the past, new transportation
facilities often were constructed on farmlands. This was due, in part, to a
number of Federal laws and regulations pertaining to the protection of other
sensitive areas, such as flood plains, wetlands, wildlife habitats, etc.
Special protection is also provided for parks and historic sites. Federal law
requires that such lands not be used for Federal-aid highway purposes, unless
no feasible and prudent alternative is available. Executive Order 80-4 and the
Farmland Preservation Act increase the protection afforded farmland, so that it
is commensurate with the importance of the resource.
AGRICULTURAL
IMPACTS OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION
During FY 92, approximately 280
acres of agricultural land were purchased for the State highway system. This
represents slightly less than 1 percent of the total farmland acquired or
impacted during that period by the 10 State agencies regulated by the Farmland
Preservation Act. It is anticipated that future conversions of farmland for
highway purposes will average less than 1,000 acres per year.
The rate of farmland conversion
for highway usage is expected to remain near current levels for three reasons.
First, the current emphasis on rehabilitation of the existing system is
expected to continue in the future. Because much of today's system was
constructed in the 1920's and 1930's, an extensive and continuing program is
necessary to rehabilitate and replace narrow and deteriorated bridges and
pavements. Such a program is not expected to require significant land
acquisitions. Secondly, certain mitigating factors for reducing adverse
agricultural impacts already have been introduced into highway designs, and
more are expected. For example, current design practices now encourage use of
narrower medians and smaller interchanges. The third reason is the increased
importance given agricultural conversions in decisions regarding highway
projects.
AGRICULTURAL
IMPACTS OF AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT
The publicly owned State airport
system currently consists of 79 airports, serving 51 air carrier or commuter
airlines and thousands of private pilots. The public airports outside Chicago
occupy 39, 089 acres. Since 1983, public airports have acquired 4,433 acres,
often without State financial support.
With a few exceptions, the
system of airports envisioned in the State Airport System Plan is in place.
Scott Air Force Base near Belleville, Illinois will be expanded within the
immediate future to accommodate joint military-civilian operations. Studies
are in progress for a third major airport to serve the Chicago area and its
environs. In addition, construction of four or five new small airports is
anticipated over the next 20 years. Limited expansion of existing airports
will also be undertaken. Safety requirements of proposed airport projects will
be balanced with an analysis of farmland impacts as required by Executive Order
80-4, the Farmland Preservation Act, and this Departmental Policy Statement.
AGRICULTURAL
IMPACTS OF RAILROADS
The Illinois railroad system is
a mature network of approximately 7,900 route miles (as of January 1, 1992)
which includes mainlines and branchlines. This system has been gradually
shrinking over the years as light density lines are abandoned and traffic is
concentrated on fewer lines. Occasionally, the net result of branchline
abandonment has been an increase in the amount of land in agricultural
production since abandoned right-of-way can be restored to farmland usage.
The DOT does not own or operate
railroad lines and does not exercise jurisdiction over most railroad projects
which might affect farmland. However, in those instances where future
Departmental decisions regarding railroad projects might impact the State's
farmland resources, due consideration will be given to preserving agricultural
land and minimizing adverse impacts on its productive capacity.
AGRICULTURAL
IMPACTS OF WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
Water resources projects, such
as reservoirs, waterways, levees, and flood channels, involve land taking and
damages and may cause production losses through conversion of farmland.
However, the DOT's projects in recent years have concentrated on urban flood
control. Where farmland is involved, a special evaluation will be made of the
related impacts.
Some projects requiring DOT
permits have the potential to cause increased flood damages on adjacent
farmland. Flood impacts on adjacent farmland uses are considered, and permits
are conditioned or denied in order to minimize such damages.
IMPACT
MITIGATION
The DOT is committed to
initiating special measures when transportation projects affect agricultural
lands. Design standards are periodically reviewed and revised, and the new
standards tend to favor minimal land acquisition, taking only those lands
needed for construction and maintenance. For example, standardized
right-of-way requirements for certain types of highways have been eliminated in
favor of flexible requirements that stipulate acquisition of only those lands
essential for construction and maintenance. The DOT will place a high priority
on selecting lands which are not Prime farmlands for wetland mitigation
purposes in devising wetland compensation plans. Consideration will also be
given to mitigating wetland impacts on publicly owned lands (State or federal
lands). Where land is purchased to prevent developments incompatible with
transportation system safety or noise standards, such as land adjacent to
airports, the DOT will give priority to acquiring easements on its own projects
and will encourage other agencies to acquire only the development rights in the
surrounding areas, so that the acreage can continue in agricultural use.
Planning studies for
transportation or water resources projects will include an early determination
of the potential for farmland impacts. The DOT will carefully consider the
impacts of farmland conversion on the agricultural economy of the State.
Studies conducted in conjunction
with transportation and water resources projects will include coordination and
consultation with the Illinois Department of Agriculture and, when appropriate,
other agricultural representatives. This interdisciplinary approach should
assure that the impacts of DOT projects on the agricultural community are
adequately and accurately assessed.
Although the DOT's mitigation
measures will not necessarily eliminate the conversion of farmland to
non-agricultural purposes, impact analysis and coordination will assure that a
given conversion is consistent with our programmatic responsibilities,
Executive Order 80-4, and the Farmland Preservation Act.
Illinois
Department of Transportation – Illinois Department
of
Agriculture Cooperative Working Agreement
Pursuant to Section 4 of the
Farmland Preservation Act, the Illinois Department of Transportation
("DOT") and the Illinois Department of Agriculture ("DOA")
hereby mutually agree to the following:
1. This Cooperative Working Agreement ("AGREEMENT")
sets the guidelines for the implementation of the DOT's Agricultural Land
Preservation Policy.
2. This AGREEMENT shall apply to those projects which the DOT
authorizes, or in which it participates, except the following:
a) Those non-linear (spot) projects acquiring 10 acres or less of
land;
b) Those linear projects acquiring 3 acres or less of land per
project mile;
c) Those projects located within the boundary of an incorporated
municipality;
d) Those projects located within the official one and one-half
mile planning area of the comprehensive plan, if one exists, of an incorporated
municipality;
e) Current projects as described by Section 7 of the Farmland
Preservation Act.
3. The DOT agrees to notify, in writing, the DOA of projects that
will have an impact on farmland in Illinois. The notice from the DOT should
always be sent to the DOA within the location and environmental study phase and
prior to the holding of any public hearings related to the project. This
notice may be accomplished by the transmission of documents such as, but not
limited to, the following:
a) proposed airport layout plans,
b) draft and final environmental analyses,
c) Illinois Rail Plan,
d) FY Highway Improvement Plan,
e) Water Resources Planning Reports, and
f) documents containing project descriptions.
4. The DOA shall determine, within 10 days, whether a Study of
Agricultural Impacts is needed or not. When DOA finds that such study is
necessary, the study shall be conducted as provided in paragraph 8 below.
5. The DOT will update its notices of farmland impacts as plans
are changed and new information becomes available.
6. The DOT will cooperate in DOA's preparation of its annual
report to the Governor and to the General Assembly on the amount of farmland
converted to non-agricultural uses as a result of State action. The DOA will
attempt to advise the DOT of the type of information needed a year in advance
of the request for that information.
7. The DOT will mitigate the agricultural impacts of its projects
covered by this AGREEMENT as provided in the Illinois Department of
Transportation Agricultural Land Preservation Policy and its subsequent
amendments. Minimum median widths and compressed diamond interchanges are
representative of the mitigative measures that reduce the adverse impacts of
highway construction on agricultural resources. The DOT will place a high
priority on selecting lands which are not Prime farmlands for wetland
mitigation purposes in devising wetland compensation plans. Consideration will
also be given to mitigating wetland impacts on publicly owned lands (State or
federal lands). In accordance with Sections 2 and 3 of this AGREEMENT, wetland
compensation plans will be furnished to the DOA for review to determine
compliance with the Farmland Preservation Act.
8. The DOA further agrees to the following:
a) To follow its project review process contained in its
"Agricultural Land Preservation Policy" as amended, or other
procedures upon which the parties have agreed, in carrying out its reviews
under this AGREEMENT;
b) To complete its review of DOT projects within 30 days after
notice with all required project information from the DOT;
c) To provide information and assistance to the DOT and its
consultants upon request; and
d) To provide its comments in accordance to the procedures
specified in the relevant documents or as otherwise agreed between it and the
DOT.
9. The Illinois Departments of Agriculture and Transportation
further agree that this AGREEMENT shall bind each only to the other and creates
no rights in third parties.
10. All changes to this AGREEMENT shall be made after consultation
with, and concurrence by, both parties.
11. This AGREEMENT shall become effective upon its signature by the
Secretary of Transportation and the Director of Agriculture and shall remain in
effect until 30 June 1996.
(Source: Amended at 17 Ill. Reg. 19469, effective October 29, 1993)
 | TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUBCHAPTER q: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
PART 700
FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACT
SECTION 700.APPENDIX J ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION'S AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION POLICY STATEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT
Section 700.APPENDIX J Illinois
Commerce Commission's Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Statement and
Cooperative Working Agreement
PREFACE
On August 19,
1982, Governor James R. Thompson signed into law the Farmland Preservation Act
(Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 5, par. 1301 et seq.), which required the Illinois
Commerce Commission to develop an Agricultural Land Preservation Policy
Statement and Cooperative Working Agreement. The following Policy Statement and
Working Agreement are submitted in accordance with the Act.
POLICY
Recognizing
that the objectives of the Illinois Commerce Commission must be in accord with
the overall goals of the state and of the requirements of The Public Utilities
Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 111⅔, par. 8-406 and 8-509) and the
Illinois Commercial Transportation Law (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 95½, par.
18c-8201 and 18c-8401), it is the policy of the Illinois Commerce Commission,
in carrying out its regulatory responsibilities, to preserve Illinois farmlands
to the extent practicable and feasible, giving appropriate consideration to the
state's social, economic, conservation, aesthetic, environmental and energy goals,
all subject to court review for compliance with the Act.
BACKGROUND
AND PERSPECTIVE
Under Section
8-406 of The Public Utilities Act or Section 18c-8201 of the Illinois
Commercial Transportation Law, no utility or common carrier by pipeline may
begin construction of any new plant, equipment or facility, which is not in
substitution of and/or addition to or extension of existing facilities, without
first obtaining a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the
Commission. Under Section 8-509 of The Public Utilities Act or Section
18c-8401 of the Illinois Commercial Transportation Law, a utility or common
carrier by pipeline may take or damage private property in a manner provided by
the law of eminent domain when directed by the Commission to construct
facilities requiring the use of private property. The Illinois Commerce
Commission does not acquire any land on its own behalf for capital
improvements.
IMPACT
MITIGATION
Pursuant to the
provisions of The Public Utilities Act and the Illinois Commercial
Transportation Law, the Illinois Commerce Commission has established rules
under which utilities and common carriers by pipeline may seek Certificates of
Public Convenience and Necessity. Included within these rules are notice
requirements to interested parties. The Commission also conditions
certificates granted for cross-country electric transmission lines so as to
limit the impact upon farming operations to a minimum level.
Notice of all
certificate applications filed by fixed utilities and common carriers by
pipeline will be provided to the Illinois Department of Agriculture by mailing
a copy of the Daily Filing Reports to the Department. Upon request by the
Department to the Chief Clerk's Office, the Chief Clerk's Office will mail notice
of hearings and other activities with respect to any filed certificate
application proceeding pending before the Commission. The Department of
Agriculture may, at its option, seek to be a party to any certificate
proceeding.
If a project is
to be located outside the corporate boundaries of a municipality and will
require the purchase of an easement or land by fee simple acquisition, evidence
to be presented by the utility or common carrier by pipeline in a certificate
application shall include the following information, provided a site-specific
project (e.g., power generating plant) will require more than 1 acre of land,
or a linear-type project (e.g., electric transmission line) will require 3
acres or more of land per project mile:
A) For linear-type projects:
1) What length will be placed entirely on public right-of-way?
2) What length will be placed in whole or in part upon privately
owned land?
3) What is the easement width needed?
B) On privately owned land in which easements will be purchased:
1) What is the location of easements which must be purchased, as
indicated on a general county highway map(s)?
2) What is the current land use listed by acreage of crop land,
pasture land, wooded or brushy land, or other land?
C) On privately owned land to be purchased via fee simple
acquisition:
1) What is the location of the land which must be purchased via
fee simple acquisition as indicated on a general county highway map(s)?
2) What is the current land use listed by acreage of crop land,
pasture land, wooded or brushy land, or other land?
3) What is the proposed use of the land by the utility?
D) From how many private land owners must land be purchased:
1) Via easements?
2) Via fee simple acquisition?
E) For underground facilities:
1) How many inches of top cover will be placed above the top of
the buried facility?
2) To what extent will the utility seek to discover field title
damaged by construction operations anywhere within the construction easement
and additional working rights area?
3) What method will be employed in repairing damaged field tile?
F) For electric transmission/distribution projects utilizing
above-ground structures:
1) What type of support structures are proposed?
2) How many support structures will be placed on each of the
following land uses?
a) Crop land.
b) Pasture land.
c) Wooded or brushy land.
d) Existing utilization lines (field borders, farm roads, grassed
waterways, etc.).
e) Public right-of-way.
f) Other lands.
3) If the electric line parallels public right-of-way, but is to
be placed on private land, how far from the edge of the right-of-way will the
center line of the support structure be placed?
4) To what extent will the utility seek to discover field tile
damaged by construction operations anywhere within the construction easement
and working rights area, and how will damaged tile be repaired?
G) On lands disturbed by construction, what methods will the
utility employ to:
1) Restore soil productivity, including the alleviation of soil
compaction, on crop land, pasture land, or wooded or brushy land once
construction has been completed?
2) Restore surface drainage and repair damaged conservation
practices once construction has been completed?
3) Control excessive erosion during and after construction?
4) Ensure that all construction debris is removed once
construction has been completed?
H) What is the responsibility of the utility to correct or
compensate landowners for damages to private property or crops caused by
construction and future maintenance or repair?
IMPACT STATEMENT
Pursuant to
Section 8-406(b) of The Public Utilities Act, "no public utility shall
begin the construction of any new plant, equipment, property or facility which
is not in substitution of any existing plant, equipment, property or facility
or extension thereof or in addition thereto, unless and until it shall have
obtained from the Commission a certificate that public convenience and
necessity require such construction."
Pursuant to
Section 18c-8201(1)(a) of the Illinois Commercial Transportation Law, no person
shall begin or continue construction of any pipeline or other facilities, other
than the repair or replacement of existing pipelines or facilities, for use in
operation as a common carrier by pipeline unless the person possesses a
certificate in good standing.
Many
construction projects are in substitution of existing facilities or extensions
to existing facilities or additions to existing facilities. For this reason,
most construction projects do not require approval by the Commission.
The Commission
has no knowledge of the amount of farmland conversion that occurred under these
exceptions to the Act. Land conversions reported under this impact statement
are, therefore, limited to conversion associated with certificate applications
filed with the Commission during the years 1978 through 1986.
Electric
(certificates
applied for)
|
Year
|
Number
of Applications
|
Estimated
Acres of Land Conversion
|
Estimated
Miles of Rights-of-Way With Partial Land Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
12
|
N/A
|
82
Est.
|
|
1979
|
8
|
N/A
|
32
Est.
|
|
1980
|
7
|
N/A
|
38
Est.
|
|
1981
|
3
|
N/A
|
24
Est.
|
|
1982
|
2
|
N/A
|
40
Est.
|
|
1983
|
5
|
N/A
|
45
Est.
|
|
1984
|
None
|
|
|
|
1985
|
8
|
.300
Est.
|
30
Est.
|
|
1986
|
4
|
40
Est.
|
62
Est.
|
N/A – Not readily available but the acres converted were negligible.
Est. – Estimated.
Electric co-operatives and
municipal utilities are not subject to the Illinois Commerce Commission's
jurisdiction and do not need certificates from the Commission.
Gas
(certificates
applied for)
|
Year
|
Number
of Applications
|
Estimated
Acres of Land Conversion
|
Estimated
Miles of Rights-of-Way With Partial Land Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
1979
|
3
|
0
|
26
|
|
1980
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
|
1981
|
None
|
|
|
|
1982
|
None
|
|
|
|
1983
|
1
|
N/A
|
|
|
1984
|
None
|
|
|
|
1985
|
1
|
N/A
|
5
Est.
|
|
1986
|
3
|
3.0
Est.
|
10
Est.
|
Telephone
(certificates
applied for)
|
Year
|
Number
of Applications
|
Estimated
Acres of Land Conversion
|
Estimated
Miles of Rights-of-Way With Partial Land Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
Certificate applications to
provide telephone service to new land areas are nonexistent inasmuch as the
total land area of Illinois is assigned the present operating telephone
companies.
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
and Sewer
(certificates
authorized)
|
Year
|
Number
of Applications
|
Estimated
Acres of Land Conversion
|
Estimated
Miles of Rights-of-Way With Partial Land Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
19
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1979
|
22
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1980
|
4
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1981
|
4
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1982
|
3
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1983
|
5
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1984
|
2
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1985
|
5
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1986
|
6
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A – Not readily available.
Water utilities obtain
certificates to serve areas. Nearly all new subdivisions are adjacent to
existing built-up areas. The lands to be served are already platted for
subdivisions. Acres are not readily available. Of the 9 certificate
applications containing references to acres, we found that 624 acres were
covered by the applications to serve 1,587 residential and commercial units.
Another application covered 6,700 acres by a development company but didn't
list the units to be served in the heading of the case.
Common
Carrier by Pipeline
|
Year
|
Number
of Applications
|
Estimated
Acres of Land Conversion
|
Estimated
Miles of Rights-of-Way With Partial Land Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1986
|
1
|
1.20
|
110
Est.
|
|
ILLINOIS
COMMERCE COMMISSION
COOPERATIVE
WORKING AGREEMENT
Pursuant to
Section 4 of the Farmland Preservation Act, the Illinois Commerce Commission
(ICC) and the Illinois Department of Agriculture (DOA) hereby agree to the following:
1. A copy of the Daily Filing Reports, which identify all
certificate applications submitted to the ICC by the fixed utilities and common
carriers by pipeline, will be provided to the DOA for the duration of this
agreement.
2. The DOA will review the reports to determine if the certificate
applications qualify for the DOA's Study of Agricultural Impacts (8 Ill. Adm.
Code 700.Appendix A: Exhibit B).
3. Detailed project impact information relative to certificate
applications is not available from the ICC. Therefore, the DOA will submit a
request to the respective utility or common carrier by pipeline to obtain the
needed data for the required Study of Agricultural Impacts.
4. The DOA may exercise its option to seek to intervene in
certificate application proceedings. If a utility or common carrier by
pipeline is unwilling to provide project impact information that is required
for the Study of Agricultural Impacts, the DOA will petition the ICC to direct
the utility or common carrier by pipeline to submit said information.
5. Pursuant to its role as Intervenor, the DOA will submit written
and oral testimony to the ICC which reflects the results of the Study of
Agricultural Impacts.
6. The ICC will consider the results of the DOA's study in
determining whether a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity will be
issued and/or modified for the project proposal.
7. All changes to this cooperative agreement shall be made after
consultation with and concurrence by both parties.
(Source: Amended at 11 Ill. Reg. 19011, effective November 10, 1987)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|