Illinois General Assembly

Mobile Top Bar

Public Act 104-0587

Public Act 0587 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

 


 
Public Act 104-0587
 
HB3175 EnrolledLRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b

    AN ACT concerning transportation.
 
    Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
 
    Section 5. The Illinois Vehicle Code is amended by
changing Section 11-208.9 as follows:
 
    (625 ILCS 5/11-208.9)
    Sec. 11-208.9. Automated traffic law enforcement system;
approaching, overtaking, and passing a school bus.
    (a) As used in this Section, "automated traffic law
enforcement system" means a device with one or more motor
vehicle sensors working in conjunction with the visual signals
on a school bus, as specified in Sections 12-803 and 12-805 of
this Code, to produce recorded images of motor vehicles that
fail to stop before meeting or overtaking, from either
direction, any school bus stopped at any location for the
purpose of receiving or discharging pupils in violation of
Section 11-1414 of this Code or a similar provision of a local
ordinance.
    An automated traffic law enforcement system is a system,
in a municipality or county operated by a governmental agency,
that produces a recorded image of a motor vehicle's violation
of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance and is
designed to obtain a clear recorded image of the vehicle and
the vehicle's license plate. The recorded image must also
display the time, date, and location of the violation.
    (b) As used in this Section, "recorded images" means
images recorded by an automated traffic law enforcement system
on:
        (1) 2 or more photographs;
        (2) 2 or more microphotographs;
        (3) 2 or more electronic images; or
        (4) a video recording showing the motor vehicle and,
    on at least one image or portion of the recording, clearly
    identifying the registration plate or digital registration
    plate number of the motor vehicle.
    (c) A municipality or county that produces a recorded
image of a motor vehicle's violation of a provision of this
Code or a local ordinance must make the recorded images of a
violation accessible to the alleged violator by providing the
alleged violator with a website address, accessible through
the Internet.
    (d) For each violation of a provision of this Code or a
local ordinance recorded by an automated traffic law
enforcement system, the county or municipality having
jurisdiction shall issue a written notice of the violation to
the registered owner of the vehicle, who shall be liable for
the violation unless otherwise provided in this Section as the
alleged violator. The notice shall be delivered to the
registered owner of the vehicle, by mail, within 30 days after
the Secretary of State notifies the municipality or county
confirms of the identity of the owner of the vehicle, but in no
event later than 90 days after the violation.
    (e) The notice required under subsection (d) shall
include:
        (1) the name and address of the registered owner of
    the vehicle;
        (2) the registration number of the motor vehicle
    involved in the violation;
        (3) the violation charged;
        (4) the location where the violation occurred;
        (5) the date and time of the violation;
        (6) a copy of the recorded images;
        (7) the amount of the civil penalty imposed and the
    date by which the civil penalty should be paid;
        (8) a statement that recorded images are evidence of a
    violation of overtaking or passing a school bus stopped
    for the purpose of receiving or discharging pupils;
        (9) a warning that failure to pay the civil penalty or
    to contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of
    liability;
        (10) a statement that the person may elect to proceed
    by:
            (A) paying the fine; or
            (B) challenging the charge in court, by mail, or
        by administrative hearing; and
        (11) a website address, accessible through the
    Internet, where the person may view the recorded images of
    the violation.
    (e-5) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a
school bus was stopped for the purpose of receiving or
discharging pupils and that the visual signals as specified in
Sections 12-803 and 12-805 were in operation on the school bus
when recorded images produced by an automated traffic law
enforcement system show:
        (1) an activated stop signal arm; and
        (2) an electronic indicator indicating activation of
    school bus visual signals.
    (f) (Blank).
    (g) Based on inspection of recorded images produced by an
automated traffic law enforcement system, a notice alleging
that the violation occurred shall be evidence of the facts
contained in the notice and admissible in any proceeding
alleging a violation under this Section.
    (h) Recorded images made by an automated traffic law
enforcement system are confidential and shall be made
available only to the alleged violator and governmental and
law enforcement agencies for purposes of adjudicating a
violation of this Section, for statistical purposes, or for
other governmental purposes. Any recorded image evidencing a
violation of this Section, however, may be admissible in any
proceeding resulting from the issuance of the citation.
    (i) The court or hearing officer may consider in defense
of a violation:
        (1) that the motor vehicle or registration plates or
    digital registration plates of the motor vehicle were
    stolen before the violation occurred and not under the
    control of or in the possession of the owner or lessee at
    the time of the violation;
        (1.5) that the motor vehicle was hijacked before the
    violation occurred and not under the control of or in the
    possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the
    violation;
        (2) that the driver of the motor vehicle received a
    Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer for a
    violation of Section 11-1414 of this Code within
    one-eighth of a mile and 15 minutes of the violation that
    was recorded by the system;
        (3) that the visual signals required by Sections
    12-803 and 12-805 of this Code were damaged, not
    activated, not present in violation of Sections 12-803 and
    12-805, or inoperable; and
        (4) any other evidence or issues provided by municipal
    or county ordinance.
    (j) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle was hijacked or
the motor vehicle or registration plates or digital
registration plates were stolen before the violation occurred
and were not under the control or possession of the owner or
lessee at the time of the violation, the owner or lessee must
submit proof that a report concerning the motor vehicle or
registration plates was filed with a law enforcement agency in
a timely manner.
    (k) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle received a
Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer at the time of
the violation, the motor vehicle owner is subject to a
mandatory civil penalty of $300 not exceeding $150 for a first
time violation or $1,000 $500 for a second or subsequent
violation, plus an additional penalty of not more than $100
for failure to pay the original penalty in a timely manner, if
the motor vehicle is recorded by an automated traffic law
enforcement system. A violation for which a civil penalty is
imposed under this Section is not a violation of a traffic
regulation governing the movement of vehicles and may not be
recorded on the driving record of the owner of the vehicle, but
may be recorded by the municipality or county for the purpose
of determining if a person is subject to the higher fine for a
second or subsequent offense.
    (l) A school bus equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system must be posted with a sign indicating that
the school bus is being monitored by an automated traffic law
enforcement system.
    (m) A municipality or county that has one or more school
buses equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement
system must provide notice to drivers by posting a list of
school districts using school buses equipped with an automated
traffic law enforcement system on the municipality or county
website. School districts that have one or more school buses
equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement system must
provide notice to drivers by posting that information on their
websites.
    (n) A municipality or county operating an automated
traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical
analysis to assess the safety impact in each school district
using school buses equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system following installation of the system and
every 2 years thereafter. A municipality or county operating
an automated speed enforcement system before the effective
date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly
shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety
impact of the system by no later than one year after the
effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General
Assembly and every 2 years thereafter. Each statistical
analysis shall be based upon the best available crash,
traffic, and other data, and shall cover a period of time
before and after installation of the system sufficient to
provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact.
Each statistical analysis shall be consistent with
professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. Each
statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data
required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions
and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following
the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement
system. Each statistical analysis required by this subsection
shall be made available to the public and shall be published on
the website of the municipality or county. If a statistical
analysis indicates that there has been an increase in the rate
of crashes at the approach to school buses monitored by the
system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional
studies to determine the cause and severity of the crashes,
and may take any action that it determines is necessary or
appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the crashes
involving school buses equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system.
    (o) The compensation paid for an automated traffic law
enforcement system must be based on the value of the equipment
or the services provided and may not be based on the number of
traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by the
system.
    (o-1) No member of the General Assembly and no officer or
employee of a municipality or county shall knowingly accept
employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a
vendor that provides automated traffic law enforcement system
equipment or services to municipalities or counties. No former
member of the General Assembly shall, within a period of 2
years immediately after the termination of service as a member
of the General Assembly, knowingly accept employment or
receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that
provides automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or
services to municipalities or counties. No former officer or
employee of a municipality or county shall, within a period of
2 years immediately after the termination of municipal or
county employment, knowingly accept employment or receive
compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides
automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or services
to municipalities or counties.
    (p) No person who is the lessor of a motor vehicle pursuant
to a written lease agreement shall be liable for an automated
speed or traffic law enforcement system violation involving
such motor vehicle during the period of the lease; provided
that upon the request of the appropriate authority received
within 120 days after the violation occurred, the lessor
provides within 60 days after such receipt the name and
address of the lessee.
    Upon the provision of information by the lessor pursuant
to this subsection, the county or municipality may issue the
violation to the lessee of the vehicle in the same manner as it
would issue a violation to a registered owner of a vehicle
pursuant to this Section, and the lessee may be held liable for
the violation.
    (q) (Blank).
    (r) After a municipality or county enacts an ordinance
providing for automated traffic law enforcement systems under
this Section, each school district within that municipality or
county's jurisdiction may implement an automated traffic law
enforcement system under this Section. The elected school
board for that district must approve the implementation of an
automated traffic law enforcement system. The school district
shall be responsible for entering into a contract, approved by
the elected school board of that district, with vendors for
the installation, maintenance, and operation of the automated
traffic law enforcement system. The school district must enter
into an intergovernmental agreement, approved by the elected
school board of that district, with the municipality or county
with jurisdiction over that school district for the
administration of the automated traffic law enforcement
system. The proceeds from a school district's automated
traffic law enforcement system's fines shall be divided
equally between the school district and the municipality or
county administering the automated traffic law enforcement
system.
    (s) If a county or municipality changes the vendor it uses
for its automated traffic law enforcement system and must, as
a consequence, apply for a permit, approval, or other
authorization from the Department for reinstallation of one or
more malfunctioning components of that system and if, at the
time of the application, the new vendor operates an automated
traffic law enforcement system for any other county or
municipality in the State, then the Department shall approve
or deny the county or municipality's application for that
permit, approval, or other authorization within 90 days after
its receipt.
    (t) The Department may revoke any permit, approval, or
other authorization granted to a county or municipality for
the placement, installation, or operation of an automated
traffic law enforcement system if any official or employee who
serves that county or municipality is charged with bribery,
official misconduct, or a similar crime related to the
placement, installation, or operation of the automated traffic
law enforcement system in the county or municipality.
    The Department shall adopt any rules necessary to
implement and administer this subsection. The rules adopted by
the Department shall describe the revocation process, shall
ensure that notice of the revocation is provided, and shall
provide an opportunity to appeal the revocation. Any county or
municipality that has a permit, approval, or other
authorization revoked under this subsection may not reapply
for such a permit, approval, or other authorization for a
period of 1 year after the revocation.
(Source: P.A. 102-905, eff. 1-1-23; 102-982, eff. 7-1-23;
103-154, eff. 6-30-23; 103-364, eff. 7-28-23.)
Effective Date: 1/1/2027