Public Act 90-0118 of the 90th General Assembly

State of Illinois
Public Acts
90th General Assembly

[ Home ] [ Public Acts ] [ ILCS ] [ Search ] [ Bottom ]


Public Act 90-0118

HB1613 Enrolled                                LRB9003936SMdv

    AN ACT in relation to domestic violence.

    Be it enacted by the People of  the  State  of  Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:

    Section  2.  The  Criminal  Code  of  1961  is amended by
adding Section 12-6.3 as follows:

    (720 ILCS 5/12-6.3 new)
    Sec. 12-6.3.  Interfering with the reporting of  domestic
violence.
    (a)  A person commits the offense of interfering with the
reporting of domestic violence when, after  having  committed
an  act  of domestic violence, he or she prevents or attempts
to prevent the victim of or a witness to the act of  domestic
violence  from  calling  a  9-1-1 emergency telephone system,
obtaining medical assistance, or making a report to  any  law
enforcement official.
    (b)  For  the  purposes  of  this  Section, the following
terms shall have the indicated meanings:
         (1)  "Domestic  violence"  shall  have  the  meaning
    ascribed to it in Section 112A-3 of the Code of  Criminal
    Procedure of 1963.
         (2)  "Family  or  household  members" shall have the
    meaning ascribed to it in Section 112A-3 of the  Code  of
    Criminal Procedure of 1963.
    (c)  Sentence.    Interfering   with   the  reporting  of
domestic violence is a Class A misdemeanor.

    Section 5.  The Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 is
amended by changing Section 214 as follows:

    (750 ILCS 60/214) (from Ch. 40, par. 2312-14)
    Sec. 214.  Order of protection; remedies.
    (a)  Issuance  of  order.   If  the  court   finds   that
petitioner has been abused by a family or household member or
that  petitioner  is  a  high-risk adult who has been abused,
neglected, or exploited, as defined in this Act, an order  of
protection  prohibiting  the  abuse, neglect, or exploitation
shall issue; provided that petitioner must also  satisfy  the
requirements   of   one   of   the   following  Sections,  as
appropriate: Section 217 on emergency orders, Section 218  on
interim orders, or Section 219 on plenary orders.  Petitioner
shall not be denied an order of protection because petitioner
or respondent is a minor. The court, when determining whether
or  not  to  issue  an order of protection, shall not require
physical manifestations of abuse on the person of the victim.
Modification and extension  of  prior  orders  of  protection
shall be in accordance with this Act.
    (b)  Remedies and standards.  The remedies to be included
in  an  order of protection shall be determined in accordance
with this Section and  one  of  the  following  Sections,  as
appropriate:  Section 217 on emergency orders, Section 218 on
interim orders, and  Section  219  on  plenary  orders.   The
remedies  listed  in  this subsection shall be in addition to
other civil or criminal remedies available to petitioner.
         (1)  Prohibition of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
    Prohibit  respondent's  harassment,   interference   with
    personal  liberty,  intimidation of a dependent, physical
    abuse, or willful deprivation, neglect  or  exploitation,
    as defined in this Act, or stalking of the petitioner, as
    defined  in  Section 12-7.3 of the Criminal Code of 1961,
    if such abuse, neglect,  exploitation,  or  stalking  has
    occurred  or  otherwise  appears  likely  to occur if not
    prohibited.
         (2)  Grant of  exclusive  possession  of  residence.
    Prohibit  respondent  from  entering  or remaining in any
    residence or household of the petitioner,  including  one
    owned  or leased by respondent, if petitioner has a right
    to occupancy thereof. The grant of  exclusive  possession
    of the residence shall not affect title to real property,
    nor  shall the court be limited by the standard set forth
    in Section 701 of the Illinois Marriage  and  Dissolution
    of Marriage Act.
              (A)  Right  to  occupancy.  A party has a right
         to occupancy of a residence or household  if  it  is
         solely  or  jointly  owned  or leased by that party,
         that party's spouse, a person with a legal  duty  to
         support  that party or a minor child in that party's
         care, or by any person  or  entity  other  than  the
         opposing   party   that   authorizes   that  party's
         occupancy  (e.g.,  a  domestic  violence   shelter).
         Standards  set  forth  in subparagraph (B) shall not
         preclude equitable relief.
              (B)  Presumption of hardships.   If  petitioner
         and  respondent each has the right to occupancy of a
         residence or household, the court shall balance  (i)
         the  hardships  to respondent and any minor child or
         dependent adult in respondent's care resulting  from
         entry  of  this  remedy  with  (ii) the hardships to
         petitioner and any minor child or dependent adult in
         petitioner's care resulting from continued  exposure
         to  the  risk  of abuse (should petitioner remain at
         the  residence  or  household)  or  from   loss   of
         possession  of  the  residence  or household (should
         petitioner leave to avoid the risk of abuse).   When
         determining  the  balance  of  hardships,  the court
         shall also take into account  the  accessibility  of
         the  residence  or  household. Hardships need not be
         balanced if respondent does  not  have  a  right  to
         occupancy.
              The  balance  of hardships is presumed to favor
         possession by petitioner unless the  presumption  is
         rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence, showing
         that   the  hardships  to  respondent  substantially
         outweigh the hardships to petitioner and  any  minor
         child  or dependent adult in petitioner's care.  The
         court, on the request of petitioner or  on  its  own
         motion,  may  order  respondent to provide suitable,
         accessible, alternate housing for petitioner instead
         of excluding respondent from a mutual  residence  or
         household.
         (3)  Stay  away  order  and additional prohibitions.
    Order respondent to stay  away  from  petitioner  or  any
    other  person  protected  by  the order of protection, or
    prohibit respondent from entering or remaining present at
    petitioner's  school,  place  of  employment,  or   other
    specified  places at times when petitioner is present, or
    both, if reasonable,  given  the  balance  of  hardships.
    Hardships  need  not be balanced for the court to enter a
    stay away order or prohibit entry if  respondent  has  no
    right to enter the premises.
         If   an   order   of  protection  grants  petitioner
    exclusive  possession  of  the  residence,  or  prohibits
    respondent  from  entering  the  residence,   or   orders
    respondent   to   stay  away  from  petitioner  or  other
    protected persons, then the court  may  allow  respondent
    access  to  the residence to remove items of clothing and
    personal  adornment  used  exclusively   by   respondent,
    medications,  and  other  items as the court directs. The
    right to access shall be exercised on only  one  occasion
    as   the   court  directs  and  in  the  presence  of  an
    agreed-upon adult third party or law enforcement officer.
         (4)  Counseling.    Require   or    recommend    the
    respondent to undergo counseling for a specified duration
    with    a    social    worker,   psychologist,   clinical
    psychologist,  psychiatrist,   family   service   agency,
    alcohol  or substance abuse program, mental health center
    guidance counselor, agency providing services to  elders,
    program  designed  for  domestic  violence abusers or any
    other guidance service the court deems appropriate.
         (5)  Physical  care  and  possession  of  the  minor
    child.  In order to protect the minor child  from  abuse,
    neglect,  or  unwarranted  separation from the person who
    has been the  minor  child's  primary  caretaker,  or  to
    otherwise  protect the well-being of the minor child, the
    court may do either or both of the following:  (i)  grant
    petitioner  physical  care  or  possession  of  the minor
    child, or both, or (ii)  order  respondent  to  return  a
    minor  child  to,  or  not remove a minor child from, the
    physical care of a parent or person in loco parentis.
         If a court finds, after a hearing,  that  respondent
    has  committed  abuse  (as  defined  in Section 103) of a
    minor child, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that
    awarding physical care to respondent would not be in  the
    minor child's best interest.
         (6)  Temporary  legal custody. Award temporary legal
    custody to petitioner in accordance  with  this  Section,
    the  Illinois  Marriage  and Dissolution of Marriage Act,
    the Illinois Parentage Act  of  1984,  and  this  State's
    Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act.
         If  a  court finds, after a hearing, that respondent
    has committed abuse (as defined  in  Section  103)  of  a
    minor child, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that
    awarding  temporary legal custody to respondent would not
    be in the child's best interest.
         (7)  Visitation.  Determine the  visitation  rights,
    if  any,  of  respondent  in  any case in which the court
    awards physical care or  temporary  legal  custody  of  a
    minor  child  to petitioner.  The court shall restrict or
    deny respondent's visitation with a minor  child  if  the
    court  finds  that respondent has done or is likely to do
    any of the following: (i) abuse  or  endanger  the  minor
    child  during  visitation;  (ii) use the visitation as an
    opportunity to abuse or harass petitioner or petitioner's
    family or household members; (iii) improperly conceal  or
    detain the minor child; or (iv) otherwise act in a manner
    that  is  not  in  the best interests of the minor child.
    The court shall not be limited by the standards set forth
    in Section 607.1 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution
    of Marriage Act.  If the  court  grants  visitation,  the
    order shall specify dates and times for the visitation to
    take  place  or  other  specific parameters or conditions
    that are appropriate.   No  order  for  visitation  shall
    refer merely to the term "reasonable visitation".
         Petitioner  may  deny respondent access to the minor
    child  if,  when  respondent  arrives   for   visitation,
    respondent is under the influence of drugs or alcohol and
    constitutes  a  threat  to  the  safety and well-being of
    petitioner or petitioner's minor children or is  behaving
    in a violent or abusive manner.
         If  necessary  to protect any member of petitioner's
    family or household from future abuse,  respondent  shall
    be  prohibited  from  coming to petitioner's residence to
    meet the minor child  for  visitation,  and  the  parties
    shall  submit  to  the  court  their  recommendations for
    reasonable alternative arrangements  for  visitation.   A
    person may be approved to supervise visitation only after
    filing  an  affidavit  accepting  that responsibility and
    acknowledging accountability to the court.
         (8)  Removal or concealment of minor child. Prohibit
    respondent from removing a minor child from the State  or
    concealing the child within the State.
         (9)  Order  to  appear.   Order  the  respondent  to
    appear  in court, alone or with a minor child, to prevent
    abuse, neglect, removal or concealment of the  child,  to
    return the child to the custody or care of the petitioner
    or  to  permit any court-ordered interview or examination
    of the child or the respondent.
         (10)  Possession  of   personal   property.    Grant
    petitioner exclusive possession of personal property and,
    if   respondent   has   possession   or  control,  direct
    respondent to promptly make it available  to  petitioner,
    if:
              (i)  petitioner,  but  not respondent, owns the
         property; or
              (ii)  the parties  own  the  property  jointly;
         sharing   it  would  risk  abuse  of  petitioner  by
         respondent or is impracticable; and the  balance  of
         hardships favors temporary possession by petitioner.
         If  petitioner's  sole  claim  to  ownership  of the
    property is that it is marital property,  the  court  may
    award  petitioner  temporary possession thereof under the
    standards of subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph only  if
    a  proper  proceeding  has  been filed under the Illinois
    Marriage and Dissolution  of  Marriage  Act,  as  now  or
    hereafter amended.
         No  order under this provision shall affect title to
    property.
         (11)  Protection of property.  Forbid the respondent
    from  taking,  transferring,   encumbering,   concealing,
    damaging  or  otherwise disposing of any real or personal
    property, except as explicitly authorized by  the  court,
    if:
              (i)  petitioner,  but  not respondent, owns the
         property; or
              (ii)  the parties own the property jointly, and
         the  balance  of  hardships  favors  granting   this
         remedy.
         If  petitioner's  sole  claim  to  ownership  of the
    property is that it is marital property,  the  court  may
    grant  petitioner  relief under subparagraph (ii) of this
    paragraph only if a  proper  proceeding  has  been  filed
    under  the  Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage
    Act, as now or hereafter amended.
         The  court  may  further  prohibit  respondent  from
    improperly using the financial or other resources  of  an
    aged  member of the family or household for the profit or
    advantage of respondent or of any other person.
         (12)  Order   for   payment   of   support.    Order
    respondent to pay temporary support for the petitioner or
    any child in the petitioner's care or custody,  when  the
    respondent has a legal obligation to support that person,
    in  accordance with the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution
    of Marriage Act, which shall govern, among other matters,
    the amount of support,  payment  through  the  clerk  and
    withholding  of  income  to secure payment.  An order for
    child support may be granted to a petitioner with  lawful
    physical  care  or  custody  of  a  child, or an order or
    agreement for physical care or custody, prior to entry of
    an order for legal custody.  Such a support  order  shall
    expire upon entry of a valid order granting legal custody
    to  another,  unless  otherwise  provided  in the custody
    order.
         (13)  Order for payment of losses. Order  respondent
    to  pay petitioner for losses suffered as a direct result
    of the abuse, neglect,  or  exploitation.    Such  losses
    shall  include,  but not be limited to, medical expenses,
    lost earnings or other support, repair or replacement  of
    property  damaged  or  taken, reasonable attorney's fees,
    court  costs  and  moving  or  other   travel   expenses,
    including  additional  reasonable  expenses for temporary
    shelter and restaurant meals.
              (i)  Losses affecting family needs.  If a party
         is entitled to seek maintenance,  child  support  or
         property distribution from the other party under the
         Illinois  Marriage  and Dissolution of Marriage Act,
         as now or hereafter amended,  the  court  may  order
         respondent  to reimburse petitioner's actual losses,
         to the  extent  that  such  reimbursement  would  be
         "appropriate  temporary  relief",  as  authorized by
         subsection (a)(3) of Section 501 of that Act.
              (ii)  Recovery of expenses.  In the case of  an
         improper  concealment  or  removal of a minor child,
         the court may order respondent to pay the reasonable
         expenses incurred or to be incurred  in  the  search
         for  and  recovery of the minor child, including but
         not limited to  legal  fees,  court  costs,  private
         investigator fees, and travel costs.
         (14)  Prohibition of entry.  Prohibit the respondent
    from  entering or remaining in the residence or household
    while the respondent is under the influence of alcohol or
    drugs  and  constitutes  a  threat  to  the  safety   and
    well-being   of   the   petitioner  or  the  petitioner's
    children.
         (14.5)  Prohibition of firearm possession.  (a) When
    a complaint is made under  a  request  for  an  order  of
    protection,  that  the  respondent  has  threatened or is
    likely to use firearms illegally against the  petitioner,
    and  the respondent is present in court, or has failed to
    appear after receiving actual  notice,  the  court  shall
    examine on oath the petitioner, and any witnesses who may
    be produced.  If the court is satisfied that there is any
    danger  of the illegal use of firearms, it shall issue an
    order  that  any  firearms  in  the  possession  of   the
    respondent,  except  as  provided  in  subsection (b), be
    turned over to  the  local  law  enforcement  agency  for
    safekeeping.  If the respondent has failed to appear, the
    court shall issue a warrant for seizure of any firearm in
    the   possession   of   the  respondent.  The  period  of
    safekeeping shall be for a stated period of time  not  to
    exceed  2  years.   The  firearm  or  firearms  shall  be
    returned  to  the  respondent  at  the  end of the stated
    period or at  expiration  of  the  order  of  protection,
    whichever  is  sooner.      (b)  If  the  respondent is a
    peace officer as defined in Section 2-13 of the  Criminal
    Code  of  1961,  the  court shall order that any firearms
    used by the respondent in the performance of his  or  her
    duties as a peace officer be surrendered to the chief law
    enforcement   executive   of  the  agency  in  which  the
    respondent is employed, who shall retain the firearms for
    safekeeping for the stated period not to exceed  2  years
    as set forth in the court order.
         (15)  Prohibition of access to records.  If an order
    of  protection  prohibits  respondent from having contact
    with the minor  child,  or  if  petitioner's  address  is
    omitted  under  subsection  (b)  of  Section  203,  or if
    necessary  to  prevent  abuse  or  wrongful  removal   or
    concealment  of  a  minor  child,  the  order  shall deny
    respondent  access  to,  and  prohibit  respondent   from
    inspecting,   obtaining,  or  attempting  to  inspect  or
    obtain, school or any other records of  the  minor  child
    who is in the care of petitioner.
         (16)  Order  for payment of shelter services.  Order
    respondent to reimburse  a  shelter  providing  temporary
    housing and counseling services to the petitioner for the
    cost  of  the  services,  as certified by the shelter and
    deemed reasonable by the court.
         (17)  Order for injunctive relief.  Enter injunctive
    relief necessary or appropriate to prevent further  abuse
    of  a  family  or  household  member  or  further  abuse,
    neglect,  or  exploitation  of  a  high-risk  adult  with
    disabilities   or   to  effectuate  one  of  the  granted
    remedies, if supported by the balance of  hardships.   If
    the  harm  to  be prevented by the injunction is abuse or
    any other  harm  that  one  of  the  remedies  listed  in
    paragraphs   (1)  through  (16)  of  this  subsection  is
    designed to prevent, no  further  evidence  is  necessary
    that the harm is an irreparable injury.
    (c)  Relevant factors; findings.
         (1)  In  determining  whether  to  grant  a specific
    remedy, other than payment of support,  the  court  shall
    consider  relevant  factors, including but not limited to
    the following:
              (i)  the nature, frequency,  severity,  pattern
         and  consequences  of  the  respondent's past abuse,
         neglect or exploitation of  the  petitioner  or  any
         family    or   household   member,   including   the
         concealment of his or her location in order to evade
         service of process or notice, and the likelihood  of
         danger  of future abuse, neglect, or exploitation to
         petitioner  or  any  member   of   petitioner's   or
         respondent's family or household; and
              (ii)  the  danger  that any minor child will be
         abused or neglected or improperly removed  from  the
         jurisdiction,  improperly concealed within the State
         or improperly separated  from  the  child's  primary
         caretaker.
         (2)  In  comparing  relative  hardships resulting to
    the parties from loss of possession of the  family  home,
    the  court shall consider relevant factors, including but
    not limited to the following:
              (i)  availability, accessibility, cost, safety,
         adequacy,  location  and  other  characteristics  of
         alternate housing for each party and any minor child
         or dependent adult in the party's care;
              (ii)  the effect on the party's employment; and
              (iii)  the effect on the  relationship  of  the
         party, and any minor child or dependent adult in the
         party's   care,   to   family,  school,  church  and
         community.
         (3)  Subject  to  the  exceptions   set   forth   in
    paragraph  (4)  of  this subsection, the court shall make
    its findings in an official record  or  in  writing,  and
    shall at a minimum set forth the following:
              (i)  That   the   court   has   considered  the
         applicable relevant factors described in  paragraphs
         (1) and (2) of this subsection.
              (ii)  Whether   the   conduct   or  actions  of
         respondent, unless  prohibited,  will  likely  cause
         irreparable harm or continued abuse.
              (iii)  Whether  it  is  necessary  to grant the
         requested relief in order to protect  petitioner  or
         other alleged abused persons.
         (4)  For  purposes  of issuing an ex parte emergency
    order of protection, the court, as an alternative  to  or
    as  a  supplement  to  making  the  findings described in
    paragraphs  (c)(3)(i)   through   (c)(3)(iii)   of   this
    subsection, may use the following procedure:
         When  a  verified petition for an emergency order of
    protection  in  accordance  with  the   requirements   of
    Sections 203 and 217 is presented to the court, the court
    shall  examine  petitioner  on  oath  or affirmation.  An
    emergency order of protection  shall  be  issued  by  the
    court if it appears from the contents of the petition and
    the  examination  of  petitioner  that  the averments are
    sufficient to indicate abuse by respondent and to support
    the  granting  of  relief  under  the  issuance  of   the
    emergency order of protection.
         (5)  Never    married   parties.    No   rights   or
    responsibilities  for  a  minor  child  born  outside  of
    marriage attach to a putative father until a  father  and
    child   relationship   has  been  established  under  the
    Illinois Parentage Act of 1984, the Illinois  Public  Aid
    Code,  Section  12 of the Vital Records Act, the Juvenile
    Court Act of 1987, the Probate Act of 1985,  the  Revised
    Uniform   Reciprocal  Enforcement  of  Support  Act,  the
    Uniform Interstate  Family  Support  Act,  the  Expedited
    Child  Support Act of 1990, any judicial, administrative,
    or other act of another state  or  territory,  any  other
    Illinois  statute,  or by any foreign nation establishing
    the father and child relationship, any  other  proceeding
    substantially    in    conformity   with   the   Personal
    Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of
    1996 (Pub. L. 104-193), or where both parties appeared in
    open court or at an administrative hearing  acknowledging
    under   oath or admitting by affirmation the existence of
    a  father  and  child  relationship.   Absent   such   an
    adjudication,  finding,  or  acknowledgement, no putative
    father shall be granted temporary custody  of  the  minor
    child,  visitation with the minor child, or physical care
    and possession of the minor child, nor shall an order  of
    payment for support of the minor child be entered.
    (d)  Balance  of hardships; findings.  If the court finds
that the balance of hardships does not support  the  granting
of  a  remedy  governed by paragraph (2), (3), (10), (11), or
(16) of subsection (b) of this  Section,  which  may  require
such  balancing,  the  court's findings shall so indicate and
shall include a finding as to  whether  granting  the  remedy
will   result   in   hardship   to   respondent   that  would
substantially outweigh the hardship to petitioner from denial
of the remedy. The findings shall be an official record or in
writing.
    (e)  Denial of remedies.  Denial of any remedy shall  not
be based, in whole or in part, on evidence that:
         (1)  Respondent  has  cause  for  any  use of force,
    unless that cause satisfies the standards for justifiable
    use of force provided by Article VII of the Criminal Code
    of 1961;
         (2)  Respondent was voluntarily intoxicated;
         (3)  Petitioner acted in self-defense or defense  of
    another,  provided  that,  if  petitioner utilized force,
    such force was  justifiable  under  Article  VII  of  the
    Criminal Code of 1961;
         (4)  Petitioner  did  not  act  in  self-defense  or
    defense of another;
         (5)  Petitioner  left  the residence or household to
    avoid  further  abuse,  neglect,   or   exploitation   by
    respondent;
         (6)  Petitioner  did  not  leave  the  residence  or
    household   to   avoid   further   abuse,   neglect,   or
    exploitation by respondent;
         (7)  Conduct  by  any  family  or  household  member
    excused   the   abuse,   neglect,   or   exploitation  by
    respondent, unless that same conduct would  have  excused
    such  abuse,  neglect, or exploitation if the parties had
    not been family or household members.
(Source: P.A. 88-45; 89-367, eff. 1-1-96.)

[ Top ]