Updating the database of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) is an ongoing process.
Recent laws may not yet be included in the ILCS database, but they are found on this site as Public
soon after they become law. For information concerning the relationship between statutes and Public Acts, refer to the
Because the statute database is maintained primarily for legislative drafting purposes,
statutory changes are sometimes included in the statute database before they take effect.
If the source note at the end of a Section of the statutes includes a Public Act that has
not yet taken effect, the version of the law that is currently in effect may have already
been removed from the database and you should refer to that Public Act to see the changes
made to the current law.
(720 ILCS 5/6-2)
(from Ch. 38, par. 6-2)
(a) A person is not criminally responsible for conduct
if at the time of
such conduct, as a result of mental disease or mental defect, he lacks
substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct.
(b) The terms "mental disease or mental defect" do not include an
abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial
(c) A person who, at the time of the commission of a criminal offense,
was not insane but was suffering from a mental illness, is not relieved
of criminal responsibility for his conduct and may be found guilty but mentally
(d) For purposes of this Section, "mental illness" or "mentally ill"
means a substantial disorder of thought, mood, or behavior which afflicted
a person at the time of the commission of the offense and which impaired
that person's judgment, but not to the extent that he is unable to appreciate
the wrongfulness of his behavior.
(e) When the defense of insanity has been presented during the trial,
the burden of proof is on the defendant to prove by clear and convincing
evidence that the defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity. However,
the burden of proof remains on the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the elements of each of the offenses charged, and, in a jury trial
where the insanity defense has been presented, the jury must be instructed
that it may not consider whether the defendant has met his burden of proving
that he is not guilty by reason of insanity until and unless it has first
determined that the State has proven the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt of the offense with which he is charged.
(Source: P.A. 89-404, eff. 8-20-95; 90-593, eff. 6-19-98.)